Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1970WLN778
..... have no bearing on the present case.15. mr. raj narain made an attempt to secure some support from maharaj kumar kamal singh v. the commissioner of income-tax, bihar add orissa air 1059 sc 257 and relied upon the observations appearing at page 260:it is clear that two conditions must be satisfied before the income tax officer can act under ..... . bombay city v. ramsukh motilal, 1955(27) i. t. r. 54: (s) a i. r. 1955 bombay 227 and r. k. das and co. v. commissioner of i. t. west bengal, 1958-30 i. t. r. 439: (a. i. r. 1956 gal, 161) and we think that view is fight.this authoritative pronouncement of the supreme court must govern the the ..... and that this could not have caused any prejudice to the assessee. he relied upon chhatturam and ors. v. commissioner of income-tax bihar air 1947 fd 32, maharaj kumar kamal singh v. the commissioner of income-tax bihar and orissa air 1059 sc 257, and pioneer motors (private) ltd. v. municipal council, nagercoil : [1961]3scr609 .12. on the other hand, it was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR2007Raj183
..... immovable, is transferred inter vivos and which is not otherwise specifically provided for by schedule i (or by schedule i-a as the case may be - andhra pradesh, west bengal, bihar, madhya pradesh, orissa, punjab and the union territory of goa, daman and diu - see the respective acts noticed at the head of schedule i-a)(schedule i-a or schedule i-b .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1982Raj48
..... section 5-a of the act. the other ten states namely, assam, bihar, gujarat, haryana, maharashtra, madhya pradesh. orissa, punjab, uttar pradesh and west bengal have not enacted any provision similar to section 5-a of the act, with the result that the jurisdiction of the local authorities like municipalities ..... grant of permission to construct a cinema building. a perusal of such enactments and rules pertaining to the states of andhra pradesh, assam, bihar, gujarat, haryana, kerala, karnataka, maharashtra, madhya pradesh, orissa, punjab, tamil nadu, uttar pradesh and west bengal would reveal that only four of them, namely, andhra pradesh, kerala, karnataka, and tamil nadu have enacted provisions similar to the provisions of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1954Raj65
..... was recoverable by land-holders from tenants, 63. coming to more modern days the author after showing that the crop-sharing system of cultivation existed on a vast scale in bengal, bihar, punjab, bombay, madras and c. p., records at page 24 that the main varieties of sharing are 1/3, 2/5, and 1/2, the assessment being payable by the ..... ) ex-proprietarytenant.1/5th of the gross produce of his holding. 1/6th of the gross produce of his holding. 1/8th of the gross produce of his holding.4. orissa (for occupancy tenants only)(i) districts ofpuri. cuttack & balasore.(ii) ganjam and kora-put districts,1/3rd of gross produce or value thereof..1/6th of gross produce or ..... gross produce of his holding.(ii) occupancy tenant1/6th of the gross produce of his holding(iii) ex-proprietary tenant.1/8th of the gross produce of his holding.4. orissa (for occupancy tenants only)(i) districts of puri, cuttack &bala-sore.;1/3rd of gross produce or value thereof.(ii) ganjam and kora-put districts.1/6th of gross .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2007(4)Raj3462
..... associated tanners vizianagram, a.p. v. c.t.o., vizianagram, andhra pradesh : [1986]1scr969 , weston electronics v. state of gujarat air 1988 sc 2038, west bengal hosiery assn. v. state of bihar : air1988sc1814 , state of u.p. v. renusagar power co. : air1988sc1737 , indian cement v. state of andhra pradesh : [1988]2scr574 and bharat general & textiles ..... in the state. while dealing with that issue, the supreme court considered plethora of its decisions namely kathi raning rawat v. state of saurashtra : 1952crilj805 , bengal immunity company limited v. state of bihar : [1955]2scr603 , kailash nath v. state of u.p. : air1957sc790 , atiabari tea co. ltd. v. state of assam : [1961]1scr809 ..... , a hajee abdul shakoor & co. v. state of madras air 1964 sc court 1729, state of madhya pradesh v. bhailal bhai : [1964]6scr261 , kalyani stores v. state of orissa : [1966]1scr865 , state of mysore v. h. sanjeeviah : [1967]2scr673 , andhra sugar ltd. v. state of a.p. : [1968]1scr705 , state of madras v. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1987(2)WLN500
..... of section 213. the learned counsel for the non-petitioner confronted with the above submitted that firstly in kanhai lal v. state of orissa and ors. : air1980ori27 a division bench in a case of hindu has held that in view of the supreme court judgment, the ..... or after the first day of september, 1870 with in the territories which at the said date were subject to lieutenant-governor of bengal or within the local limits of the ordinary civil jurisdiction of the high court of judicature at madras and bombay. clause (b) ..... section 213 read with section 57a & b are violative of article 14 of the constitution as whereas the hindu living in west bengal or madras and bombay is required to obtain probate before asserting his claim either as a plaintiff or defendant, to the property situated ..... a will there he would be treated differently from the other hindus who executes will in haryana or assam or bihar or other parts of the country. more over even if they are living in those parts of the country .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1968Raj233; 1968CriLJ1214
..... milk is as follows:-- 'a. 11. 01. 02. buffalo milk shall contain not less than 5.0 per cent of milk fat except in delhi, punjab, pepsu, uttar pradesh, bihar, west bengal, assam, bombay and saurashtra where it shall not be less than 6 per cent. the milk solids other than milk fat, shall be not less than 9 per cent.' then ..... instance, the standard prescribed for cow milk is as follows:-- 'a.11.01.01 cow milk shall contain not less than 3.5 per cent of milk fat, except in orissa, where it shall be not less than 8 per cent and in punjab and pepsu where it shall be not less than 4.0 per cent. the milk solids other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1990)ILLJ302Raj; 1988(2)WLN598
..... , held the provisions valid and dismissing the writ petition on the ground of alternative remedy directed the petitioner to prefer an appeal.16. in champalal binani v. cit, west bengal, (1971) 3 scc 20, the supreme court observed that when remedy is provided under the income tax act, a writ petition under article 226 is not maintainable. the ..... 's case. the division bench also considered the case of b.k. vyas v. state of rajasthan (supra), placed reliance on titagarh paper mills co. ltd. v. state of orissa (supra), mahavir insulations v. state of rajasthan, 1986 wln (uc) 305 and assistant collector of central excise v. dunlop india ltd., (air) 1985 sc 330, wherein it has ..... deposit the tax assessed. the learned judge referred to the following observations made by the supreme court in the case of titagarh paper mills co. ltd. v. state of orissa, (air) 1983 sc 603:'it is now well recognised that where a right or liability is created by a statute, which gives a special remedy for enforcing it, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : II(2001)DMC17; 2001(4)WLC684; 2001(4)WLN642
..... the facts and circumstances of this case. in hajuri's case (supra), the proceedings before the high court did arise out of sections 6 and 7 of the orissa estates abolition act, 1961 and the matter under section 8 was pending elsewhere. it was under these circumstances held by their lordships of the supreme court that high court ..... by the learned sessions judge was contrary to settled principles of judicial discipline and propriety.29. their lordships of the supreme court in bimla devi v. state of bihar, 1994 criminal lj 638, held that provisional bail granted by magistrate in spite of rejection of two earlier successive bail applications by the high court was against the ..... locus standi of the complainant in seeking cancellation of bail under sub-section (2) of section 439, cr.p.c placing reliance on thakur ram v. state of bihar, air 1966 sc 911, it was contended that only the state being aggrieved party could take all steps necessary and the complainant had no locus standi to file even .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1982CriLJ1001; 1981()WLN225
..... (6) are not routine orders and various factors have to be considered before an order for continuing the investigation is made.7. in matabar parida v. state of orissa : air1975sc1465 the question was regarding the interpretation of section 167(2) proviso (a) and it was held that the accused could net be kept in detention beyond ..... directly on the point but all the same some guidance is provided in deciding the question at issue before me:6. in superintendent & remembrance of legal affairs, west bengal v. nasima ranga rao, (1978 cri lj 1830)(cal) the question at issue was whether an order passed by the sessions judge on an application under section 167 ..... the magistrate that for special reasons and in the interest of justice the continuation of the investigation beyond the period of six months is necessary, the government of bihar will release the under-trial prisoners, unless the necessary orders of the magistrate are obtained within a period of one month from today, with would also request .....
Tag this Judgment!