Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bengal bihar and orissa and assam laws act 1912 section 4 repealed Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 3 results (0.056 seconds)

National Co-operative Consumer Federation of India Vs. the Market Comm ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)114PLR499

..... entire judgment of the apex court does not even remotely indicate , that there was any provision in the rules framed under the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941 that the dealer would not be liable to pay tax once over again. the present is ..... the execution of any contract.' this court held that the said mandatory provision was inconsistent withsection 5(2)(a)(ii) of the orissa sales tax act; and to avoid that conflict it reconciled both the provisions by holding that the rule was only directory and, ..... that makes all the difference, for it is the proviso that imposes the condition. but underrule 27(2) made under the orissa act 'a dealer shall produce a true declaration in writing by the purchasing dealer or by such responsible person as may be ..... manufacturing's case (supra), the hon'ble supreme court while interpreting section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941 and rule 27-a of the bengal sales tax rules, 1941 observed as under:-'(9) sub-rules (3) and (4) of r.27 .....

Sachdeva and Sons Rice Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab Through the Secr ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)108PLR88

..... gives a special remedy for enforcing it, the remedy provided by that statute only must be availed of.'12. in assistant collector of central excise, chandan nagar, west bengal v. dunlop india ltd.,8 a.i.r. 1985 s.c. 330, their lordships once again considered the same very question and observed:'art. 226 is not meant ..... of availability of alternative remedy under the act, the supreme court observed:' in the instant case against the order of assessment made by sales tax officer under the orissa sales-tax act the petitioners, assessees, can get adequate redress against the wrongful acts complained of. the petitioners have the right to prefer an appeal before the prescribed ..... of the high court is not allowed to be used for issue of a writ, order or direction.11. in titaghur paper mills co. ltd. v. state of orissa (supra) their lordships of the supreme court had considered justification of entertaining writ petition under article 226 or under article 32 of the constitution in a case arising under .....

Vijay Kumar Chopra and ors. Vs. Smt. Sudarshan Chopra and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2009]147CompCas267(P& H)

..... ), kanpur (urban), unnao, barawanki, gonda, basti, gorakhpur, deoria, faizabad, azamgarh, jaunpur, ballin, gazipur, sultanpur, mirzapur, varanasi, allahabad, partapgraph, rai bareli, fatehpur, banda, hamirpur, jalaun, jhansi and lalitpur).future territories.-bihar, west bengal, madhya pradesh, maharashtra, andhra pradesh and karnataka.note : certain machineries and other materials indicated in the proposal were to be adjusted between the two lots, as per the details indicated ..... no. 2item no. 1-territoties-delhi, haryana (only bhiwani, faridabad, gurgaon, mohindergarh and rewari districts), u. p. (except districts named in lot no. 1 above).future territories.-gujarat, tamil nadu, orissa, kerala, madhya pradesh and the entire country of nepal.11. in addition to above, clause (xx) of the proposals also provide for compensation in lieu of certain equipments, etc., in .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... to discharge this burden in the instant case. 39. each of the contention noticed above was given strength with the aid of following binding precedents:- (i) state of west bengal v. union of india (1964) 1 scr 371 acknowledges that articles 3 and 4 of the constitution invest the parliament with an authority to alter the boundaries of any ..... effective and useful." c. man singh v. state of haryana and ors., 2008(3) s.c.t. 364 : 2008(4) r.a.j. 170 : (2008) 12 scc 331 and bihar state electricity board v. pulak enterprises and ors., 2010(8) r.c.r.(civil) 219 : (2009) 5 scc 641, were cited to canvass that the impugned notification is discriminatory and ..... of which the executive government is made the judge." (emphasis applied) r. another full bench decision of patna high court in janardhan paswan and ors. v. state of bihar and ors., air 1988 patna 75 has been referred to, contending that the right to franchise flows from the equality clause of article 14 of the constitution and any discrimination .....

Parkash Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. Mani Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1955P& H197

..... above.. 86. in the calcutta high court at one time a large number of division benches took the view that the jurisdiction of the statutory authority under the bengal agricultural debtors act had exclusive ' authority to determine the applicability of the provisions of the act, but the opposite opinion later came into favour and beginning with -- ..... (protocol and convention) act of 1937 (section 3) there is no provision for application by a party for stay or for an intimation like under section 34, bengal agriculture debtors relief act. the stay it is submitted is imperative and automatic. therefore when information is conveyed, i should think, by an affidavit, the court must ..... 'air 1940 pg 105 (o), which is referred to in that judgment and which 1 have discussed above. the learned judge held that the amended section 20, bengal agricultural debtors' relief act, which runs as follows:'20. decision by board as to whether a person is a debtor. -- if any question arises in connection with .....

State of Punjab Vs. Om Parkash Dharwal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1972CriLJ1349

..... to place the matter of appointment of judicial officers beyond the executive power exercised by the state government. that history has been traced in detail in state of west bengal y. nripendra nath bagchi : (1968)illj270sc . after referring to the 1912 report of the islington commisison and the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 96b ..... by their absence. that too much should not be read into this judgment merely from the delineation of history etc. is evident from the subsequent observations in state of orissa v. sudhansu sekhar misra. : (1970)illj662sc ' wherein justice k. s. hegde struck a note of caution in these terms when referring to baechi's case:the ..... n n. bagchi. : (1968)illj270sc . chandra mohan v. state of u, p.. air 1966 sc 1987: the state of assam v. ranga muhammad : (1968)illj282sc . state of orissa v. sudhansu sekhar misra. : (1970)illj662sc : the state of assam v. kuseswar saikia. : [1970]2scr928 ; and chandramoulesbwar prasad v. patna high court. : [1970]2scr666 . not .....