Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bengal bihar and orissa and assam laws act 1912 section 4 repealed Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 1 results (0.039 seconds)

Basappa Vs. the State

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1959Kant1; AIR1959Mys1; ILR1958KAR288; (1958)36MysLJ580

..... bring about reorganization. under the states reorganization act the states of kerala, mysore, bombay, madhya pradesh, rajasthan and punjab were designated as new states. the andhra, assam, bihar, madras, orissa, uttar pradesh and west bengal states were retained and alterations were made in the territorial extent of some of these states by additions or subtractions. in respect of the new states of bombay .....

K.M. Ramakrishne Godwa Vs. Senior Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR3770

..... due meaning.34. a division bench of patna high court in sukhdeo narayan and ors. v. municipal corporation : air1956pat367 , also took a similar view, while interpreting the provisions of bihar and orissa municipal act, 1922. the relevant provisions required the support of two-thirds of the whole number of commissioners of the municipality to pass a non-confidence motion against the chairman ..... of the board.'33. in shyamapada ganguly v. abani mohan mukherjee : air1951cal420 , a learned single judge of the calcutta high court interpreted the words 'whole number of the commissioners' in bengal municipal act, 1932 in the same manner and held that these words refer to the total number of elected seats in a municipality and the fact that a seat is .....

D.L. Suresh Babu and Etc. Vs. Institute of Chartered Accountants of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1983Kant43

..... enactment, of which both the section and the explanation are two inseparable parts. 'they move in a body if they move at all' (vide bengal immunity co. ltd. v. state of bihar : [1955]2scr603 ). bearing in mind all these principles, i have to ascertain whether explanation-i to regulation no.67 (10) of the ..... laccadive mimicry and amindivi islands. eastern region 3. the states of assam, meghayala nagaland, orissa, west bengal manipur tripura and sikkim and the union territories of arunachal pradesh mizoram & nicobar islands 4 central region 4. the states of uttar pradesh bihar madhya pradesh and rajasthan 2 northern region 5. the states of harayana himachal pradesh jammu ..... the ruling of the supreme court in bihta co-operative development and cane marketing union limited v. bank of bihar : [1967]1scr848 .24. in construing an explanation added by an amendment to the bihar and orissa co-operative societies act, the supreme court in bihta co-operative development's case has expressed thus :'the .....

Sri. Kotresh. H Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... petitioner is facing criminal trial he has been honourably exonerated in the departmental proceedings, the court adopts the reasoning of the decisions in radheyshyam kejriwal v. state of west bengal (supra) and ashoo surendranath tewari v. deputy superintendent of police, eow, cbi (supra) and sets aside the impugned order dated 15th january 2009, passed by the ..... the appellant should have been exonerated. 21 all the aforesaid judgments are followed by this court in a.l.jayaramu (supra). after the aforesaid order, the high court of orissa in dr. minaketan pani4 (supra) has held as follows: 17. of the three judgments cited, two by mr. dhal for the petitioner and one by the learned ..... report of the central vigilance commission were brought to the notice of the high court, unfortunately, the high court took a view [prabhu saran rajya v. state of bihar, criminal miscellaneous no.5212 of 1992, order dated 3-8-1993 (pat)]. that the issues raised had to be gone into in the final proceedings and the .....

General Secretary, Linguistic Minorities Protection Committee and anr. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1989Kant226; ILR1989KAR457

..... all other states and union territories also there is a fair sprinkling of kannadigas 1.gujarat 7,1242.madhya pradesh 6,702 3.delhi 3,925s4.west bengal 1,7005. bihar 1,2986.rajasthan 952 7.orissa 8058.pondicherry 7079.arunachala pradesh 38410.assam 23911.andaman and nicobar islands 20112.punjab 23613.haryana 19414.himachal pradesh 19215.chandigrah 142as per die information given .....

Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : I(1992)DMC258; ILR1991KAR2877; 2009(3)KLJ380

..... disclosed in the true copy filed along with the petition) and addressed to the agricultural production commissioners of the states of andhra pradesh, assam, bihar, haryana, jammu and kashmir, karnataka, madhya pradesh, maharashtra, orissa, tripura, uttar pradesh, west bengal and manipur. it refers to the scheme of financing agricultural credit assistance by commercial banks introduced in 1970. it also refers to a study .....

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of list i. in this regard, our attention was drawn to the provisions of the mmdr act. per contra, learned advocate general referred to state of west bengal vs. kesoram industries limited [(2004) 10 scc201, to contend that the general power of regulation and control of mines and minerals does not include power of taxation. ..... . in view of the declaration made under section 2 of mmdr act, it was held that the orissa act was beyond the purview of the state legislature. in state of bihar vs. indian alluminium company, the validity of bihar forest restoration and improvement of degraded forest land taxation act, 1992 was struck down, as it was ..... -:212. :- this regard, reliance was placed on state of travancore, cochin vs. shanmugha vilas cashewnut factory, quilon [air1953sc333 (shanmugha vilas cashewnut factory) and state of orissa vs. minerals and metals trading corporation of india limited [1994 supp. (3) scc109 (mmtc of india ltd.). he contended that there is an express bar against the state .....

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of list i. in this regard, our attention was drawn to the provisions of the mmdr act. per contra, learned advocate general referred to state of west bengal vs. kesoram industries limited [(2004) 10 scc 201], to contend that the general power of regulation and control of mines and minerals does not include power of taxation ..... consideration. in view of the declaration made under section 2 of mmdr act, it was held that the orissa act was beyond the purview of the state legislature. in state of bihar vs. indian alluminium company, the validity of bihar forest restoration and improvement of degraded forest land taxation act, 1992 was struck down, as it was ..... this regard, reliance was placed on state of travancore, cochin vs. shanmugha vilas cashewnut factory, quilon [air 1953 sc 333] (shanmugha vilas cashewnut factory) and state of orissa vs. minerals and metals trading corporation of india limited [1994 supp. (3) scc 109] (mmtc of india ltd.). he contended that there is an express bar against .....

M.D. Narayan Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ572

..... by the courts were considered by the supreme court in shri prithvi cotton mills limited v broach borough municipality and others, mahal chand sethia v state of west bengal, state of madhya pradesh v ranojirao shinde, municipal corporation of the city of ahmedabad v the new shrock spinning and weaving company limited and in the matter ..... on judicial power if the legislation was within the competence of the legislature. further, relying upon m/s. utkal contractors and joinery (private) limited v stateof orissa, it has been urged that it could not be said that the state while legislating the act had encroached upon the judicial power and set aside the binding ..... military estate officer, government of andhra pradesh v hindustan machine tools limited, i.n. saksena v state of madhya pradesh, and misri lal jain v state of orissa . 15. in the instant case having regard to the then existing provisions of the act, this court declared that the act and notification issued thereunder in relation to .....

Shri T P Shankaraiah Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... if a decision has been given per incuriam the court can ignore it. it is also true that the decision of this court in the case of bengal immunity co. ltd. v. state of bihar [air1955sc661: (1955) 2 scr603 623]. was not regarding an order which had become conclusive inter parties. the court was examining in that case only the doctrine of ..... ]. . this is the practice followed by this court and now it is a crystallised rule of law. see in this connection, as mentioned hereinbefore, the observations of the state of orissa v. titaghur paper mills [1985 supp scc280: (1985) 3 scr26 and also union of india v. godfrey philips india ltd [(1985) 4 scc369 387 :1985. supp (3) scr123 145]..47 ..... the reasoning on which it is based, is found, on that account to be demonstrably wrong. see morelle v. wakeling [(1955) 1 all er708 718-f]. . also see state of orissa v. titaghur paper mills co. ltd. [1985 supp scc280: (1985) 3 scr26 we are of the opinion that in view of the clear provisions of section 7(2) of the .....