Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bengal bihar and orissa and assam laws act 1912 section 4 repealed Court: telecom disputes settlement and appellate tribunal tdsat

Jan 31 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Dishnet Wireless Ltd., and Others Vs. Union of India, Dot

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... in service areas of andhra pradesh, mumbai, maharashtra, karnataka, tamil nadu, madhya pradesh, u.p.(east), u.p.(west), punjab, haryana, gujarat, kolkata, kerala, bihar, orissa and rajasthan. according to its case, on the basis of the start-up spectrum of 4.4 mhz, it was able to satisfy the subscriber linked criteria fixed ..... areas of delhi, mumbai, kolkata, maharashtra, gujarat, andhra pradesh, karnataka, tamil nadu, punjab, haryana, up(west), up(east), rajasthan, madhya pradesh, west bengal, himachal pradesh, bihar and orissa. according to its case, on the basis of the start-up spectrum of 4.4 mhz, it was able to satisfy the subscriber linked criteria fixed under the ..... petitions no.360 of 2012 and 361 of 2012 respectively. dishnet seeks additional allocation of 1.8 mhz spectrum in the service areas of bihar, north-east, west bengal, j and k, kolkata, orissa, up (east) and three districts (sonitpur, nagaon and morigaon) of the assam service area. dishnet had taken out uas licences under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2012 (TRI)

Reliance Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

The Petitioner, a licensee under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, is before us questioning the guidelines issued by the First Respondent herein being dated 3.7.2012. 2. It has also prayed for a direction upon the said Respondent to allow the CDMA operators also to have access to two blocks of spectrum of 1.25 MHz in 800 MHz CDMA band which is said to have been allowed to the existing GSM operators in 1800 MHz band. 3. The question as to whether the aforementioned guidelines can be impugned before us at this stage fell for our consideration in Vodafone India Ltd. and Ors. vs. Union of India and Anr. , Petition No.461 of 2012 disposed of on 1.8.2012. The principal contention of the Petitioner is that by reason of the impugned guidelines whereas the GSM operators have been allowed to obtain additional spectrum depending upon the number of subscribers, the CDMA operators like the Petitioner have been deprived therefrom. The said question has arisen, inter alia, having regard to...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //