Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bengal bihar and orissa and assam laws act 1912 section 4 repealed Page 14 of about 154 results (0.101 seconds)

A.V. Fernandez Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC657; [1957]1SCR837; [1957]8STC561(SC)

..... the constitution. there were on the statute book various sales tax acts enacted by the provincial legislatures, viz., bihar sales tax act, 1947, bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, madhya pradesh sales tax act, 1947, madras sales tax act, 1939, mysore sales tax act, 1948, orissa sales tax act, 1947, east punjab general sales tax act, 1948, and the uttar pradesh sales tax ..... in support of this position on the observations of this court in messrs. chatturam horilram ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, bihar and orissa : [1955]27itr709(sc) : 'as has been pointed out by the federal court in chatturam v. c.i.t., bihar [1947] f.c.r. 116 (quoting from the judgment of lord dunedin in whitney v. commissioners of inland revenue [1926 .....

Smt. Seema Vs. Ashwani Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1158; 2006(2)ALD57(SC); 2006(2)AWC1599(SC); 2006(2)BomCR497; (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN191; 101(2006)CLT639(SC); 2006(1)CTC552; 127(2006)DLT282(SC); I(2006)DMC327SC; [200

..... , 2002. in five states provisions appear to have been made for voluntary registration of muslim marriages. these are assam, bihar, west bengal, orissa and meghalaya. the 'assam moslem marriages and divorce registration act, 1935,' the 'orissa muhammadan marriages and divorce registration act, 1949' and the 'bengal muhammadan marriages and divorce registration act, 1876' are the relevant statutes. in uttar pradesh also it appears that the ..... of registering marriages. in the state of haryana, the haryana hindu marriage registration rules, 2001 under section 8 of the hindu act have been notified. in the state of west bengal, hindu marriage registration rules, 1958 have been notified.11. from the affidavit filed on behalf of the state of tripura, it appears that the said state has introduced rules called .....

Raj Sahiban Shersingh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1954Raj65

..... was recoverable by land-holders from tenants, 63. coming to more modern days the author after showing that the crop-sharing system of cultivation existed on a vast scale in bengal, bihar, punjab, bombay, madras and c. p., records at page 24 that the main varieties of sharing are 1/3, 2/5, and 1/2, the assessment being payable by the ..... ) ex-proprietarytenant.1/5th of the gross produce of his holding. 1/6th of the gross produce of his holding. 1/8th of the gross produce of his holding.4. orissa (for occupancy tenants only)(i) districts ofpuri. cuttack & balasore.(ii) ganjam and kora-put districts,1/3rd of gross produce or value thereof..1/6th of gross produce or ..... gross produce of his holding.(ii) occupancy tenant1/6th of the gross produce of his holding(iii) ex-proprietary tenant.1/8th of the gross produce of his holding.4. orissa (for occupancy tenants only)(i) districts of puri, cuttack &bala-sore.;1/3rd of gross produce or value thereof.(ii) ganjam and kora-put districts.1/6th of gross .....

Sri. Kotresh. H Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... petitioner is facing criminal trial he has been honourably exonerated in the departmental proceedings, the court adopts the reasoning of the decisions in radheyshyam kejriwal v. state of west bengal (supra) and ashoo surendranath tewari v. deputy superintendent of police, eow, cbi (supra) and sets aside the impugned order dated 15th january 2009, passed by the ..... the appellant should have been exonerated. 21 all the aforesaid judgments are followed by this court in a.l.jayaramu (supra). after the aforesaid order, the high court of orissa in dr. minaketan pani4 (supra) has held as follows: 17. of the three judgments cited, two by mr. dhal for the petitioner and one by the learned ..... report of the central vigilance commission were brought to the notice of the high court, unfortunately, the high court took a view [prabhu saran rajya v. state of bihar, criminal miscellaneous no.5212 of 1992, order dated 3-8-1993 (pat)]. that the issues raised had to be gone into in the final proceedings and the .....

Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1990]76STC447(Orissa)

..... ii of section 2 of the amending act and that too on the grounds indicated in the preceding paragraphs.8. the supreme court in the case of bengal immunity co. ltd. v. state of bihar reported in [1955] 6 stc 446 j air 1955 sc 661, quoting from heydon's case (1584) 3 co rep 7a, observed that for ..... out in the decisions of this court and the supreme court holding that the central government, the state government and their employees are not dealers as defined in the orissa sales tax act. the state legislature in its wisdom considered it necessary to suitably amend the definition of 'dealer' to include the central government, the state government and ..... 1 to 3 respectively. opposite parties nos. 4 to 8 are sales tax officers of different circles in the districts of dhenkanal, cuttack, puri, phulbani and sambalpur. the orissa sales tax act which has been amended by the impugned statute shall, for convenience, be referred to as 'the principal act' hereafter.2. the petitioners challenge the vires of .....

The Gauhati High Court Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... . dixitulu, (1979) 2 scc 34 : (air 1979 sc 193), b. s yadav v. state of haryana, air 1981 sc 561 : (1981 lab 1c 104), ranjit prasad sinha v. state of bihar, air 1987 sc 1894: 1987 lab 1c 1633. 13. from the decisions of the supreme court referred to earlier, the following principles can be gathered :-- (a) control over the district ..... , air 1975 sc 613 : (1975 lab 1c 375), state of haryana y. inder prakash anand, air 1976 sc 184'l : (1976 lab 1c 1190), baradakanta mishra v. high court of orissa, air 1976 sc 1899 : (1976 lab 1c 1202), baldev raj guliani v. the p & h high court, air 1976 sc 2490 : (1976 lab 1c 1633), state of u.p. v ..... officers in the following decisions: 'the high court, calcutta v. amal kumar roy, air 1962 sc 1704, state of west bengal v. n.n. bagchi, air 1966 sc 447, the state of assam v. ranga muhammad, air 1967 sc 903, state of orissa v. sudhansu sekhar misra, air 1968 sc 647, g. s nagmoti v. state of mysore (1969) 3 scc 325 .....

Shri Mohan Lal Chokhany Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1971]28STC367(Cal)

..... (madras) rule 5(4). but here under section 11(1) a full scale assessment is contemplated in west bengal. the state of bihar introduces a penalty for such failure a sum not exceeding five rupees per day, whereas orissa introduces a penalty for the same ground but for which the penalty cannot exceed 1/10th per cent. of ..... exempt from arrest because of possible political repercussions if such influential persons are subjected to such treatment what is the rationale in providing different periods of detention for bengal and the punjab ?we must be in a position to postulate some reasonable basis for the differentiation and we cannot get away from this necessity by vague references ..... the tax due or rupees five for every day thereafter. we have already noticed that section 11(1) of the west bengal .....

Maharao Sahib Shri Bhim Singhji ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1981SC234; (1981)1SCC166

..... eleven sponsoring states under article 252(1) of the constitution. the state legislatures of andhra pradesh, gujarat, haryana, himachal pradesh, karnataka, maharashtra, orissa, punjab, tripura, uttar pradesh and west bengal considered it desirable to have an uniform legislation enacted by parliament for the imposition of ceiling on urban property for the country as a whole and ..... constitution. subsequently, the act was adopted, after passing resolutions under article 252(1) of the constitution by the state of assam on march 25, 1976, and those of bihar on april 1, 1976, madhya pradesh on september 9, 1976, manipur on march 12, 1976, meghalaya on april 7, 1976 and rajasthan on march 9, 1976. thus ..... of land in the hands of a few individuals and to do away with intermediaries was for a public purpose. but that case dealt with three statutes (the bihar land reforms act, 1950. the m.p. abolition of proprietary right act, 1950 and the u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950), the common .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC2328; (1977)GLR919; (1977)0GLR90; 1977LabIC1857; (1977)4SCC193; [1978]1SCR423

..... the government for an ex-cadre post (state of orissa v. sudhansn sekhar misra 1968 12 scr 1 54; considering their fitness for being retained in service and recommending their discharge from service (ram gopal v. state of ..... day-to-day work of the subordinate courts. thus, the 'control' envisaged by article 235 comprehends control over the conduct and discipline of district judges (state of west bengal v. nrindera nath bagchi : (1968)illj270sc ; their further promotions and confirmations (state of assam v. kuseswar : [1970]2scr928 and joginder nath v. union of ..... india air 1975 sc 514; disputes regarding their seniority (state of bihar v. madan mohan : (1976)illj288sc ; their transfers (state of assam v. ranga muhammad) : (1968)illj282sc ; the placing of their services at the disposal of .....

Madanlal Patodia and ors. Vs. Luxminarayan Cotton Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1978]48CompCas747(Cal)

..... the right of the owners in respect of the said company which was declared to be a sick undertaking and now vests in the national textile corporation of west bengal, assam and bihar ltd.6. mr. p. n. chatterjee appearing for the company and the custodian first referred to section 108 of the companies act and submitted that the company ..... for registration but the company declined to do so. consequently, an application under section 38 of the indian companies act, 1913, was made in the high court at orissa which was allowed by the high court and an appeal from the same was dismissed by the division bench of the high court and the company appealed to the ..... , moni mohan mukherjee v. jalpaiguri cinema ltd. [1975] 79 cwn 512, ramesh chandra mitter v. jogin mohan chatterjee ilr [1920] (cal) 901, indian chemical products ltd. v. state of orissa [1966] 36 comp cas 592 (sc), maneckji pestonji bharucha v. wadilal sarabhai and co. [1926] 53 i.a. 92; air 1926 pc 38, whereby the power of the court under .....