Barrister - Judgment Search Results
Barrister Prasad Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-10-1996
Reported in: [1997(75)FLR343]; (1998)IIILLJ913Bom
Employer-Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., vide Writ Petition No. 3613 of 1991, and the other petition was filed by Barrister Prasad, the employee, vide Writ Petition No. 3669 of 1991.2. Both the above mentioned Writ Petitions came to
Thakorlal Chunilal Barrister Vs. Ishwarlal Uttamram and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-06-1973
Reported in: (1974)15GLR766
D.A. Desai, J.1. Petitioner Thakorlal Chunilal Barrister was the original defendant and opponents were the original plaintiffs. Plaintiffs filed Regular Civil Suit No. 1392 of
In Re: Barristers and Vakils
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-1909
Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.297
1. The Acting Chief Justice intimated that the majority of the Court were of opinion that the Vakils had no right of audience in the High Court in cases sent up for trial there under Act...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Barrister Prasad and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-29-1994
Reported in: (1995)IILLJ536Bom
Matched in: Parties Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Barrister Prasad and ors.
Jitendra Chandra Roy Chowdhury and anr. Vs. S.N. Banerjee, Barrister-a ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-05-1942
Reported in: AIR1943Cal181
Ballav, Jyotish Chandra, Rukmini Ballav and Manmatha. Their estate is now under the management of Mr. S.N. Banerji, Barrister-at-Law, who was appointed a receiver, by the original side of this Court in Extraordinary suit No. 4 of
In Re: Tasadduq Ahmad Khan Sherwani Barrister At-law
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-23-1922
Reported in: (1922)ILR44All352
Matched in: Parties In Re: Tasadduq Ahmad Khan Sherwani Barrister At-law
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free