Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Barristers and Vakils

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 13, 1909
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/876979

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Vakils - Right of audience--Case under Criminal Law Amendment Act XIV of 1908. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Barristers and Vakils

Legal References

Reported In
4Ind.Cas.297

Excerpt

vakils - right of audience--case under criminal law amendment act xiv of 1908. - 1. the acting chief justice intimated that the majority of the court were of opinion that the vakils had no right of audience in the high court in cases sent up for trial there under act xiv of 1908; the reasons for so holding, if necessary, would be given later.

Full Judgment

1. The Acting Chief Justice intimated that the majority of the Court were of opinion that the Vakils had no right of audience in the High Court in cases sent up for trial there under Act XIV of 1908; the reasons for so holding, if necessary, would be given later.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial