Assert - Judgment Search Results

Palazzolo Vs. Rhode Island

Court: US Supreme Court

..... public purpose subsequently petitioner filed an inverse condemnation action in rhode island superior court asserting that the state s wetlands regulations as applied by the council to his parcel ..... by respondent rhode island coastal resources management council council he sued in state court asserting the council s application of its wetlands regulations took the property without compensation in .....

Mckune Vs. Lile

Court: US Supreme Court

..... constituted compulsion because we held that since murphy revealed incriminating information instead of timely asserting his fifth amendment privilege his disclosures were not compelled incriminations 465 u s ..... questions that the government should reasonably expect to elicit incriminating evidence ordinarily must assert the privilege rather than answer if he desires not to incriminate himself but .....

Lorillard Tobacco Co. Vs. Reilly

Court: US Supreme Court

..... tobacco and cigars petitioners a group of tobacco manufacturers and retailers filed this suit asserting among other things the supremacy clause claim that the cigarette advertising regulations are pre ..... that interest it requires that the speech restriction directly and materially advanc e the asserted governmental interest this burden is not satisfied by mere speculation or conjecture rather a .....

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(1)BomCR419

..... sebi regulations he submitted that in the present case the plaintiffs assert that they have a right to get the register rectified in ..... members his common law right however remains intact and he can assert that right by filing a suit before a court of competent ..... the respondents are not seeking equitable relief against forfeiture they are asserting their legal right to the share on the ground that the .....

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. Vs. Army Corps of Engineers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... circuit petitioner renewed its attack on respondents use of the migratory bird rule to assert jurisdiction over the site petitioner argued that respondents had exceeded their statutory authority in ..... 26729 senate debate proponents of a more limited 404 jurisdiction contended that the corps assertion of jurisdiction over wetlands and other nonnavigable waters had far exceeded what congress had .....

Nevada Vs. Hicks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reservation within a state we expressed skepticism that the indian commerce clause could justify this assertion of authority in derogation of state jurisdiction but ultimately accepted the argument that the ..... immunity therefore invokes the immunity of the sovereign when a state or federal official asserts qualified immunity he claims that his actions were reasonable in light of clearly established .....

J. Kapur Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, Ministry of Civil A ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2001Bom193; 2001(2)BomCR304; (2001)2BOMLR327; 2001(3)MhLj688

..... petition apart from challenging the locus standi of the petitioner to file the petition it is asserted that no fundamental right of the petitioner much less any statutory right is violated the ..... issuance of the certificate repeated tests and inspections are taken at regular intervals it is asserted that the director general of civil aviation and directorate of airworthiness have been vested with .....

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Mahila Anita and Others

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2003ACJ397; 2001(3)MPHT443; 2001(3)MPLJ147

..... the appellant had contested the claim of the claimants on various ground asserting that the deceased himself was responsible for the accident as he ..... deceased used to run the chuna bhatti business in kolaras he asserted that he had purchased lime from the deceased he however could ..... at the time of his death is concerned the claimants had asserted that the deceased was 23 years old at that time the .....

Vipan Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2001)168CTR(P& H)153; [2001]249ITR728(P& H)

..... the very search is stated to be illegal it is also asserted that the director of investigation was under obligation to record the ..... act have been challenged 31 as has been noticed above the assertions of the petitioners that certain facts have not been correctly recorded ..... 5 in paragraph 17 of the writ petition it had been asserted that the petitioners had acquired the knowledge from the employees of .....

ins Vs. St. Cyr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... today is fully consistent with a recognition of congress power to act retrospectively we simply assert as we have consistently done in the past that in legislating retroactively congress must make ..... some constitutional minimum of habeas relief that minimum would assuredly not embrace the rarified right asserted here the right to judicial compulsion of the exercise of executive discretion which may be .....