Assert - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: assert Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 4,522 results (0.067 seconds)44 Liquormart, Inc. Vs. Rhode Island
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1996
..... 1 the speech at issue concerns lawful activity and is not misleading 2 the asserted governmental interest is substantial and 3 the regulation directly advances the governmental interest rhode ..... inquiries yield positive answers we must determine whether the regulation directly advances the governmental interest asserted and whether it is not more extensive than is necessary to serve that interest .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDenver Area Ed. Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. Vs. Fcc
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-1996
..... 3 it is not intuitively obvious that the first amendment protects the interests petitioners assert and neither petitioners nor the plurality have adequately explained the source or justification of ..... without a compelling reason for doing so petitioners view that the constitutional presumption favors their asserted right to speak on access channels is directly contrary to turner and our established .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShaw Vs. Hunt
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-13-1996
..... i acknowledge that when north carolina sought preclearance it asserted nondiscriminatory reasons for deciding not to draw a second majority ..... 1345 1355 1357 cas 1995 21 the majority s assertion that de grandy only requires a plaintiff to show that ..... legislative apportionment scheme constitutes an invidious discrimination violative of rights asserted under the equal protection clause is that the rights .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBehrens Vs. Pelletier
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-1996
..... complaint seeks injunctive relief for which no clearly established right need be alleged second respondent asserts that appeal of denial of the summary judgment motion is not available because the denial ..... important if the possibility remains of a second pretrial appeal or because the interest asserted in a second pretrial appeal is insufficiently important if there has already been a first .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-17-1996
..... available unmodified to women alterations to accommodate women would necessarily be radical so drastic virginia asserts as to transform indeed destroy vmi s program see brief for cross petitioners 34 ..... may decide to change the one tradition like the other through democratic processes but the assertion that either tradition has been unconstitutional through the centuries is not law but politics .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.P. Shukla and ors. Vs. Central Officer Commanding-in-chief, Lucknow ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-1996
Reported in: AIR1996MP233
..... the respondents that the petitioners were falsely implicated and it was asserted that the petitioners were given full opportunity of hearing before ..... not working under the respondent no 3 it was also asserted that the petitioners could have engaged any civil counsel for ..... sohi advised the petitioners to plead guilty it was also asserted that the punishment given to the petitioners was proper and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrintz Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-03-1996
..... 514 u s at 583 concurring opinion in response to this dissent the majority asserts that the difference between a federal command addressed to individuals and one addressed to the ..... enacted legislation requiring state courts to serve functionally like contemporary regula 9 the majority asserts that these statutes relating to the administration of the federal naturalization scheme are not proper .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArizonans for Official English Vs. Arizona
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-04-1996
..... proffered to save case from mootness years after litigation began where defendants could have asserted qualified immunity had plaintiffs complaint specifically requested monetary relief on such inspection the ..... remaining between the parties reply brief for petitioners 18 19 tellingly none of the asserted controversies involved yniguez sole plaintiff and prevailing party in the district court see .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentury Textiles and Industries Ltd., Bombay and Another Vs. Maharasht ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-10-1996
Reported in: AIR1997Bom192; 1997(3)BomCR282
..... into any agreements as contemplated so far 6 the affidavit further asserts that the board has framed its conditions of supply known ..... and energy charges as already adverted to above it is asserted that the maximum demands of different consumers are not registered ..... cannot be held to be arbitrary or unreasonable it is asserted that these tariff are determined after taking out consideration the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Cipla Limited and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-08-1996
Reported in: (1996)98BOMLR727
..... employed through respondent no 2 the moment such persons complete eleven months the complainant has asserted that it is the company who interviews and selects the persons they are medically examined ..... registered under the contract labour court since 1982 he has produced the licence he has asserted that according to the contract m s deluxe estate services proprietor hasmukh rathod submits his .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial