Assert - Judgment Search Results

Pankaj Mohan Rai and ors. Vs. BipIn Behari Chakladar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1924Cal118

..... that the chakladars were holding the lands wrongfully under the assertion of chak right simultaneously with that suit ten other suits ..... co owner but subsequently became a proprietor and continued to assert hostile title and exercise possession to the exclusion of the ..... the subordinate interest the chakladars were in possession with an assertion of title to the entire land in suit within defined .....

Narayanan Chetty Alias Ranganathan Chetty and ors. Vs. Elayaperumal Al ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1924Mad400

..... the rights of hukdarship in all the branches which was expressly asserted and yet the members of the second branch did not care ..... of the documentary evidence showing that each party was trying to assert his rights ever since 1871 when the quarrel began and we ..... numerous documents where the rights of first and third branches were asserted the quarrels were once settled by ex xii each branch recognising .....

Oklahoma Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... united states was disputing the claims of both states and asserting full proprietorship of the southerly half and an interest because ..... of oklahoma called for a like purpose that these conflicting assertions of jurisdiction and the measures taken to sustain them were ..... showing that the rights in the riverbed which they are asserting were mediately or immediately derived from the united states whether .....

Narayanan Chetty Alias Renganathan Chetti and ors. Vs. Elayaperumal Al ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 73Ind.Cas.381

..... of the documentary evidence showing that each party was trying to assert its rights ever since 1871 when the quarrel began and we ..... numerous documents where the rights of 1 and 3 branches were asserted the quarrels were once settled by exhibit xii each branch recognising ..... and built the temple in the written statement though it is asserted that sevugan ii bought the land and built the temple the .....

Annadana Jadaya Gounder Vs. Konammal and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1923Mad402; 71Ind.Cas.533

..... was neither hostile possession nor a recovery when kuppi naidu again asserted his claim the palayam was in the possession of a widow ..... was extinct krishnappa and his descendants had no occasion to re assert their claims and when that event occurred a claim was immediately ..... plaintiff were separate until the plaint in this case 3 contrary assertions in the litigation of 1875 and in exhibit g that the .....

Vencatachella Pillai Vs. Arunthavathatchi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 72Ind.Cas.548

..... of all these adverse decisions vencatachella the defendant went on asserting that he was the adopted son of ramachandra pillai in ..... pillai ever intended to divide from vencatachella pillai who was asserting that he was the adopted son of ramachandra pillai there ..... by the way in which vencatachella pillai himself behaved by asserting that he was the adopted son of ramachandra pillai we .....

Atchafalaya Land Co., Ltd. Vs. Williams Cypress Co., Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... could recognize as it did recognize that there might be claims derived from it asserted or to be asserted rightfully or wrongfully involving conflicts which should be decided and quieted in the public ..... such statutes are valid if they allow a reasonable time after their enactment for the assertion of an existing right or the enforcement of an existing obligation and certainly the condition .....

United States Vs. Oregon Lumber Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... thus we are brought to the conclusion that since the two remedies asserted by the petitioner were alternative remedies and since the order made ..... in force but to leave out the reservation of title but the assertion of a lien by one who has title so long as ..... bogert suit however was a suit on behalf of the minority stockholders asserting no corporate right of the railway company but only the right of .....

Heisler Vs. Thomas Colliery Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dependency upon pennsylvania is represented as impossible of evasion or relief anthracite coal is the assertion has become a prime necessity of those states particularly for domestic purposes and even municipal ..... all cases be precisely defined and the uncertainty attracts disputes and is availed of to assert or suppose collisions which in fact do not exist there is illustration in the cases .....

Oliyath Vazhayil Abuvakkar and ors. Vs. Oliyath Kunhikuttiyali and ors ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 74Ind.Cas.27

..... lesser title than he is entitled to his contention is that kunhamad and koyamutti by asserting that the properties in their possession were puthravagasam properties though they were karnavans at ..... acquire such title but there is no evidence to show that kunhamad and koyamutti ever asserted that the plaint properties were prthravagasam properties belonging only to their thavazhi whenever occasion .....