Assert - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: assert Year: 1987 Page 1 of about 2,418 results (0.062 seconds)California Vs. Cabazon Band of Indians
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-25-1987
..... of express congressional consent footnote 17 u nder certain circumstances a state may validly assert authority over the activities of nonmembers on a reservation and in exceptional circumstances a ..... from nonmembers purchasing cigarettes at tribal smokeshops the primary argument is economic it is asserted that smokeshop cigarette sales generate substantial revenues for the tribes which they expend for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTO'Lone Vs. Estate of Shabazz
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-09-1987
..... reasonable to preclude respondents from attending jumu ah petitioners have provided mere unsubstantiated assertions that the plausible alternatives proposed by respondents are infeasible ii in turner the ..... not established the reasonableness of their policy because they have provided only bare assertions that the proposals for accommodation offered by respondents are infeasible as discussed below .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGoodman Vs. Lukens Steel Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-19-1987
..... to challenge lukens discriminatory discharges of probationary employees in failing and refusing to assert instances of racial discrimination as grievances and in tolerating and tacitly encouraging racial ..... claims in grievances claiming other contract violations a union that intentionally fails to assert discrimination claims either to avoid antagonizing the employer and thus to improve chances .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTurner Vs. Safley
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1987
..... the regulation arbitrary or irrational b whether there are alternative means of exercising the asserted constitutional right that remain open to inmates which alternatives if they exist will ..... of prison administration maintaining safety and internal security as a result the correspondence rights asserted by respondents like the organizational activities at issue in jones v north carolina prisoners .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCal. Coastal Comm'n Vs. Granite Rock Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-24-1987
..... of state land use plans to unpatented mining claims in national forest lands the commission asserts that it will use permit conditions to impose environmental regulation not land use planning ..... demonstrates an intent to preempt any state regulation second granite rock and the united states assert that indications that state land use planning over unpatented mining claims in national forests is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWelch Vs. Texas Dept. of Highways
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1987
..... offer their unsupported view that the principle of sovereign immunity is pernicious because it assertedly protects states from the consequences of their illegal conduct and prevents congress from tak ing ..... in a constitutional convention ibid this concession hardly is consistent with the dissent s assertion that adoption of the gallatin amendment would have had no practical significance footnote 19 in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHodel Vs. Irving
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-18-1987
..... concerns of the prudential standing doctrine are also satisfied even though appellees do not assert that their own property rights have been taken unconstitutionally but rather that their decedents ..... under these circumstances appellees can appropriately serve as their decedents representatives for purposes of asserting the latters fifth amendment rights pp 481 u s 711 712 2 the original .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPilot Life Ins. Co. Vs. Dedeaux
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-06-1987
..... that they were intended to provide exclusive remedies for erisa plan participants and beneficiaries asserting improper processing of benefit claims erisa s detailed provisions set forth a comprehensive civil ..... of erisa makes clear its intention that all suits brought by beneficiaries or participants asserting improper processing of claims under erisa regulated plans be treated as federal questions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsahi Metal Indus. Vs. Superior Court
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1987
..... known stream of commerce case in which the illinois supreme court applied the theory to assert jurisdiction over a component parts manufacturer that sold no components directly in illinois but did ..... examination of minimum contacts is not always necessary to determine whether a state court s assertion of personal jurisdiction is constitutional see burger king corp v rudzewicz 471 u s 462 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKeystone Bituminous Vs. Debenedictis
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-09-1987
..... been unprofitable instead petitioners have sought to narrowly define certain segments of their property and assert that when so defined the subsidence act denies them economically viable use they advance two ..... of a contractual relationship id at 438 u s 244 and therefore proceed to the asserted justifications for the impairment footnote 31 the record indicates that since 1966 petitioners have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial