Assert - Judgment Search Results

Miller Vs. Albright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court has also accorded thirdparty standing in singleton we concluded that physicians could assert the rights of indigent women denied funding for abortion because imminent mootness prevented the ..... now deal more specifically with the justifications that justice stevens finds adequate justice stevens asserts that subsection a 4 serves two interests first ensuring reliable proof of a biological .....

Microland Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in: (1998)67ITD446(Bang.)

..... further letter in which the genuineness of the lease transactions was asserted on the ground that the purchase of the cylinders and ..... obtain ownership of the assets leased the assessee also once more asserted that it had information on reliable authority that the assets ..... an argument taken up by the assessee and not an assertion of fact itself regarding the arrangement for physical inspection of .....

WisconsIn Dept. of Corrections Vs. Schacht

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jurisdiction the presence of the nondiverse party automatically destroys original jurisdiction no party need assert the defect no party can waive the defect or consent to jurisdiction insurance corp ..... the case shall be remanded ibid respondent argues that at least after the state asserted its eleventh amendment defense the federal court lacked subject matter jurisdiction brief for respondent .....

Monterey Vs. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for del monte dunes unless the city s actions were roughly proportional to its asserted interests the rough proportionality discussion furthermore was unnecessary to sustain the jury s ..... building plans substantially advanced a legitimate public purpose the subquestion whether the government s asserted basis for its challenged action represents a legitimate state interest was properly removed from .....

California Vs. Deep Sea Research, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 496 that court s in rem admiralty jurisdiction california intervened asserting an interest in the brother jonathan based on the abandoned ..... operation following the district court s ruling the united states asserted a claim to any property on the brother jonathan belonging ..... the state the federal government or a foreign government has asserted ownership of the res the court s consistent interpretation of .....

New Jersey Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the law governing interstate boundary disputes takes account of the broad policy disfavoring the untimely assertion of rights that underlies the defense of laches and statutes of limitations it does ..... indeed even in 1955 and for several years thereafter when representatives of new jersey vociferously asserted jurisdiction over ellis island they claimed not just the filled portions but the entire .....

Seaways Shipping Ltd. Having Its Office at Ii Floor, Rahmat Manzil, 51 ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1998(3)CTC318

..... thelicensee s goods as contemplated in the definition given in the agreement the petitioner therefore asserts that the second respondent andor the third respondent cannot treat the vessels stevedored by ..... respondents the agreements themselves would militate against the spirit of article 14 the petitioner then asserts that since the second and third respondents have been given an unfair advantage of .....

Federal Election Comm'n Vs. Akins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... federal courts respondents have also satisfied the remaining two constitutional standing requirements the harm asserted is fairly traceable to the fec s decision about which respondents complain of ..... its important purposes richardson is indistinguishable from the present case the court s opinion asserts that our language disapproving generalized grievances invariably appears in cases where the harm .....

Allentown Mack Sales and Service, Inc. Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

..... was supported by evidence external to the employer s own subjective impressions justice breyer asserts instead that the word objective has been redefined through a series of board decisions ..... the union cannot be found to provide objective considerations because statement was a bare assertion was subjective and lacking in demonstrable foundation statement by another employee about the views of .....

Campbell Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the excluded jurors own right not to be discriminatorily denied grand jury service can be asserted by campbell because he satisfies the three preconditions for third party standing outlined in powers ..... interest in eradicating discrimination from the grand jury selection process and a vital interest in asserting their rights because his conviction may be overturned as a result see e g powers .....