Ashok Kumar V State - Judgment Search Results

K. Gopalakrishnan and Others Vs. The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative S ...

Court: Kerala

Sukumaran (2013 (3) KLT 253), Urukunnu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala (2012 (4) KLT 941), Ashok Kumar v. State of Kerala (2003 (3) KLT SN 86 (Case No.114)), Vallappuzha Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Joint Registrar (2009 … Sukumaran (2013 (3) KLT 253), Urukunnu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala (2012 (4) KLT 941), Ashok Kumar v. State of Kerala (2003 (3) KLT SN 86 (Case No.114)), Vallappuzha Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Joint Registrar (2009

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Appasaheb Balajee Parkhe and Others

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

should be inconsistent with his innocence. 24. In this connection the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashok Kumar V. State of M.P (AIR 1989 SC 1890): (1989 Cri.L.J.2124), PadalaVeera V. State of A.P (AIR 1990 SC.79), (1990 Cri. … Referred: Prithviraj V/s. State of Rajasthan reported in 2004 Cri. L.J., 2190, in paragraph Nos. 21 to 27 Ashok Kumar V. State of M.P (AIR 1989 SC 1890): (1989 Cri.L.J.2124), Padala Veera V. State of A.P (AIR 1990 SC.79), (1990

Ramkishan Digambar Jadhav and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

reasonable explanation in respect of the circumstances resulting in death of deceased Vimalbai. 33) In the case of Ashok Kumar V. State of Haryana, (2010) 12 SCC 350 the Apex Court observed in paragraphs 19 to 23 thus: “19. We … State of Maharashtra, (2007) 9 SCC 721, 6. Kans Raj Vs. State of Punjab, 2000 Cri.L.J. 2993, 7. Ashok Kumar V. State of Haryana, (2010) 12 SCC 350, 8. Tarsem Singh v. State of Punjab [AIR 2009 SC 1454], 9.

Vinayakrao S/O. Balawantrao Mane and Others Vs. the State of Maharasht ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

and to substantiate the same, he has relied upon judicial pronouncement of Apex Court in the case of Ashok Kumar v. State of Haryana, reported at AIR 2010 SC 2839, wherein Apex Court has observed thus: "From the definition it … after the marriage in connection with marriage of the said parties. The Apex Court in the case of Ashok Kumar v. State of Haryana (supra), cited by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, has enumerated the scope of term 'dowry' observing

State Vs. Regulagadda Anandarao and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1996(2)ALD(Cri)751; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)508; 1996CriLJ4503; II(1996)DMC460

A-1, it cannot be said that they have concocted a case against A-1. 19. In the case of Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1990, SC 2134 : (1990 Cri LJ 2276), it is held that : (Para 2) … A-1, it cannot be said that they have concocted a case against A-1. 19. In the case of Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1990, SC 2134 :(1990 Cri LJ 2276), it is held that :(Para 2) Law is

Ganesh Chandra Nayak Vs. State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 2003CriLJ3142

Rajasthan (1992) 3 CCR 2575 as well as the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ashok Kumar v. State of Bihar (2000) 8 JT (SC) 54 : (2001 AIR SCW 2314) in the interest of the parties, … Rajasthan (1992) 3 CCR 2575 as well as the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ashok Kumar v. State of Bihar (2000) 8 JT (SC) 54 :(2001 AIR SCW 2314) in the interest of the parties, while

Sunder Lal Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 40(1990)DLT478

which have been laid down By the Supreme Court in its various judgments. In its latest decision in Ashok Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh, : 1989CriLJ2124 , (1) the following tests have been reiterated(1)The circumstances from which an inference … should not only be consistent with the guilt of the accused but should be inconsistent with his innocence. (Ashok Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1989 SC 1990, relied on).;2. The decisions of this court are that non-production of

Air Cmde Naveen Jain Vs. Union of India .

Court: Supreme Court of India

Matched in: Advocate Sridhar Potaraju Mukesh Kumar Maroria

Krishna Murthy @ Gunodu Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Supreme Court of India

is just the same as if each of them has done it individually by himself. As observed in Ashok Kumar v. State of Punjab (AIR1977SC109, the existence of a common intention amongst the participants in a crime is the essential

Karan Singh Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

made to 8 (2012) 5 SCC7249 (2000) 8 SCC45710 (2001) 2 SCC20511 (2002) 5 SCC10012 (2003) 11 SCC36717 Ashok Kumar v. State of Haryana13 and Shivlal v. State of Chhattisgarh14.44. In Shyamlal Ghosh v. State of West Bengal15, this Court