Ashok Kumar V State - Law Dictionary Search Results
Recruitment
the content of all the rules including the fitment of candidate recruited to the service vis-'-vis each other, Ashok Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 795. Recruitment, is just the initial process which may eventually lead to … selection, promotion, deputation are all well-known methods of recruitment. Even appointment by transfer is not unknown, K. Narayanan v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1994 SC 55: (1994) Supp 1 SCC 44. The term 'recruitment' connotes and clearly signifies
Promissory estoppel
and such promise is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of promise, Black's Law Dictionary; Ashok Kumar Maheshwari v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1998) 2 SCC 502.
As soon as may be
As soon as may be, means 'as soon as practicable', Ashok Kumar v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1982 SC 1143. [National Security Act, (65 of 1980), ss. 3(2) and 8] --when the … with due promptitude or expedition and without avoidable delay in other words with reasonable dispatch, Durga Pada Ghosh v. State of West Bengal, (1972) 2 SCC 656: AIR 1972 SC 2420 (2426). [Constitution of India, Art. 22(5)] As
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Imprisonment for life
45, IPC. So read in it would ordinarily mean imprisonment for the full or complete span of life, Ashok Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1991 SC 1792 (1800): (1991) 3 SCC 498: (1991) 1 SCR 858. [Indian Penal … contained in Jail Manual (e.g. Para 516B of Punjab/Haryana Jail Manual) are irrele-vant in this context, Kartar Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 1982 SC 1439: (1982) 3 SCC 1: (1983) 1 SCR 445. The expression 'imprisonment for
Colourable legislation
when it knows it is not, it can be said that the legislation so enacted is colourable legislation, Ashok Kumar v. Union of India, (1991) 3 SCC 498 (509): AIR 1991 SC 1792, [Constitution of India, Arts. 245 and … veiled by what appears, on proper examination, to be a mere pretense or disguise, K.C. Gajapathi Narayan Deo v. State, (1954) SCR 1: AIR 1953 SC 375. See also Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport
Election
1951 to the declaration of the result under s. 66 of the Act, Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar, (2000) 8 SCC 216 (226). (Constitution of India, Art. 329) The word 'election' cannot be restricted only to … from amongst several persons, then in the broader sense he is elected to the office, Dinesh Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar, (1955) Supp 1 SCC 340. The term 'election' as occurring in Article 329 is to mean
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try the research workspace - 7 days free