Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Page 91 of about 27,321 results (0.510 seconds)

B.K.Thankappan Vs. Velayudhan Nadar

Court : Kerala

Reported in : ILR2010(4)Ker408

..... decree for redemption of mortgage. 4. act 35 of 1969 came into force on 01-01-1970. this court vide judgment dated 06-02-1976 held that predecessor-in- interest of petitioners is a deemed tenant under sec.4a of the act. sec.17 of the act enables a small holder to apply to the land tribunal to apply for resumption. sec.18 of ..... in the case of a holding or part of a holding, the landowner or an intermediary is a minor or a person of unsound mind or a member of the armed forces of a seaman or a legal representative of any such member or seaman, or a small holder, the right, title and interest of the landowner and intermediaries, if any ..... the issue and pass consequential orders in the matter based on the decision of the civil court. pendancy of the suit before the civil court did not bar the land tribunal from entertaining (admitting for consideration) the application. viewed in that line, that the appeals were pending consideration of the first appellate court or this court in second appeals .....

Smt.Komal Rugwani. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

..... run by the cantonment board. 19. the cantonments act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier cantonments act, 1924. "cantonment" is defined under section 3 of new act as a place or places along with boundaries in which any part of armed forces is quartered, which the central government may, by ..... the services of a teacher working in a primary ashram school were terminated. that order was challenged before the school tribunal constituted under the meps act. the school tribunal set aside that order. the order of the school tribunal was challenged before this court. this court relying on the judgment of the full bench in the case of suryakant ..... private primary school recognised by a body or officer referred to in sub-section (2) of section 39 of the bombay primary education act, 1947 can approach the tribunal under section 9 of the meps act, 1977, if he/she is aggrieved by any action of the management as stipulated in the said provision? (ii) in other .....

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Appellant) Vs. M (Respondent ...

Court : House of Lords

..... fails to respect his or her private life, even if in practice the criminal law is not enforced (dudgeon; norris); so does intrusive interrogation and humiliating discharge from the armed forces (smith and grady; lustig-prean and beckett). banning a former kgb officer from all public sector posts, and from a wide range of responsible private-sector posts, is ..... a breach under both limbs (that is article 14 in conjunction with article 8 and in conjunction with article 1 fp). relying on section 6 of the interpretation act 1978 the tribunal felt able to read the definition of "unmarried couple" as "a man or a woman and a woman or a man who are not married to each ..... reasons i would allow the appeal, set aside the orders below and remit the matter to the tribunal for any necessary adjustments to be made to the maintenance assessment. baroness hale of richmond my lords, 99. the civil partnership act 2004 came into force on the day we began to hear this case. it grants to same sex couples the same .....

Ujjam Bai. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC1621; 1963(1)SCR778

..... with the words "notwithstanding any thing in this chapter". only one exemption has been made in favour of a court or tribunal constituted by or ordered under any law relating to the armed forces.there are other jurisdiction of the supreme court also, which may be described as advisory and original, arising in special circumstances ..... as infringing fundamental rights guaranteed therein, and that even if they are subject to the restrictions in part iii, an order of assessment made by a tribunal acting judicially under a statute which is intra vires such as the impugned order dated december 20 1958, does not infringe article 19(1)(g), and that, ..... (3) the consequence is the same where assessment is made by an authority which has no jurisdiction to impose the tax and (4) if an administrative tribunal acting quasi-judicially misconstrues a provision which it has jurisdiction to construe and therefore imposes a tax infringement according of article 19(1)(g) would result according to kailash .....

State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Manoharsinhji Pradyumansinhji JadejA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in crop share;explanation- i.-a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces shall be deemed to cultivate land personally, if such land is cultivated by her or his servants or hired labour;explanation ii.- in the case of a joint family ..... the appeal by an order dated 10.11.1983. the respondent preferred a revision under section 38 of the act of 1960 which was registered as ten.b.r.4/84 before the gujarat revenue tribunal. the gujarat revenue tribunal by its judgment dated 08.09.1989 partly allowed the revision and directed that randarda lands admeasuring 40 acres to ..... expression, namely, the definition of 'land' read along with the definition of 'agriculture' under the act of 1960 as has been so construed by the authorities constituted under the provisions of act of 1960 up to the level of gujarat revenue tribunal. on behalf of the appellant it was contended that the subsequent amendment brought out under the 1974 .....

Gnct of Delhi, Delhi Fire Service Vs. Bholla Dutt Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... review application. however, the respondents are permitted to challenge the orders dated 19.1.2005, for which an application under section 19 of the administrative tribunal act shall be filed within four weeks from today. if the application is filed within this period, the petitioner shall not take an objection regarding limitation. ..... delhi police act, 1978 is concerned, every person working in the delhi police including the persons working in the wireless section are required to perform functions of policing, maintenance of law and order etc. if the situation so requires. this is the reason why, even the ministerial staff in the armed forces which would ..... of decision-making.18. resultantly, for the foregoing reasons, impugned order is set aside. respondents are directed now to consider the findings recorded by the tribunal earlier on oa-2719/2001 (supra) regarding applicants being similarly circumstanced with those of their counterparts in communication wing of delhi police and in turn .....

Arun Kumar Shukla Vs. Secretary Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... arun kumar shukla versus union of india and others.the case of baldev singh (supra).the facts and the rules applicable were with regard to working in the armed forces. they were entirely different whereas in the case of ranchhodji chaturji thakore (supra) and jaipal singh (supra).the law laid down is only to deny arrears of ..... and as the benefit of continuity in service for the intervening period was also denied and orders were passed rejecting the same, petitioner approached the central administrative tribunal and the tribunal having rejected the claim by the impugned order-dated 1.3.2012 annexure p/6, this writ petition has been filed. 3- a perusal of the ..... be granted to the petitioner. 6- learned counsel for the respondents emphasized that the petitioner is responsible for his conviction in the criminal case and as the act of his termination is because of his involvement in the criminal case, which ultimately resulted in his conviction, the employer cannot be saddled with the liability of .....

Laxmi Chand Vs. Gnct of Delhi Through Commissioner of Police and Anoth ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... non-communication of entries in the annual confidential report of a public servant whether he is in civil, judicial, police or any other service (other than the armed forces), it has civil consequences because it may affect his chances of promotion or getting other benefits. hence, such non-communication would be arbitrary, and as such ..... the aforesaid reliefs submitted that while passing the impugned orders, the respondents failed to appreciate that the punishment awarded to the applicant was quashed by this tribunal as well as the high court with the directions that he is entitled to all consequential benefits. further, the respondents themselves have implemented the aforesaid ..... cive to fairness and transparency in public administration, and would result in fair-ness to public servants. the state must be a model employer, and must act fairly towards its employees. only then would good governance be possible. xxx xxx xxx 41. in our opinion, non-communication of entries in the annual .....

Present: Mr. R.S. Sihota Senior Advocate with Vs. Union of India and O ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... mr.karminder singh, advocate for respondents no.1 and 2. **** hemant gupta, j.(oral) the challenge in the present writ petition is to an order passed by armed forces tribunal, chandigarh regional bench at chandimandir (for short the tribunal ) on 09.05.2011 whereby a civil suit filed by the petitioner before the civil judge (junior division).rewari, transferred to the ..... as reservist is to be counted as service admissible for determining eligibility for pension. it is argued that in response to the information sought under the right to information act, 2005, it transpires that the local police authorities have made effort to know the whereabouts of the petitioner from 16.04.1973 to 18.04.1973. the superintendent ..... on 26.08.2009. such suit is clearly barred by limitation as the cause of action arose to the petitioner in the year 1973. the learned tribunal has rightly dismissed the petition as the same was being barred by limitation. we do not find any illegality in the order passed by the .....

Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate with Vs. Union of India and O ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... advocate for respondents no.1 to 3. **** hemant gupta, j.(oral) the challenge in the present writ petition is to an order passed by armed forces tribunal, chandigarh regional bench at chandimandir (for short the tribunal ) on 27.01.2014 whereby an original application filed by the petitioner, inter alia, for quashing para 9 of annexure a-9 of promotion ..... g) 0.5 (h) mention-in-despatches 0.3 the challenge to para 9 of promotion policy dated 04.1.2011 remained unsuccessful before the tribunal for the reason that the gallant acts of the petitioner were given weightage while considering him for promotion from the rank of major to lieutenant colonel and from lieutenant colonel to colonel. the ..... in indian army on 18.06.1983. the petitioner was awarded sena medal (gallantry) for act of exceptional devotion to duty and courage on 26.01.1986. the petitioner was awarded vir chakra for conduct during indian peace keeping force in sr.lanka on 26.01.1991. diwakar gulati 2014.07.26 11:23 i attest .....