Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Court: kerala Page 1 of about 306 results (0.137 seconds)

Akhil G Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Kerala

..... whether the proper forum for adjudicating the grievances of the petitioner is not the armed forces tribunal under the armed forces tribunals act, 2007. 2. the central government counsel appearing would submit that there is still some doubt regarding the same since in respect of appointment and enrolment, the tribunal takes a view that the tribunal does not have jurisdiction in so far as going by the definition of ..... service matters in section 3(o), only over persons subject to the army act, 1950, the tribunal .....

Soudamini Vs. Kunhathi

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2012(3)KLT96

..... p4 order on the aforesaid application. that orders reads thus: heard. the civil court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition as per s.33, 34, 35 of armed force tribunal act, 2007. no interim relief is (sic) such relief can be granted. the suit is also dismissed. hence no such direction can be granted. hence interlocutory application dismissed. ..... subject to the army act, 1950, navy act, 1957 and air force act, 1950 sub-s. (2) of ..... whose services are governed by the provisions of the india army act. 7. suit was laid much before the coming into force of the armed forces tribunals act, which received the assent of the president on 20.12.2007, and came into force on 15.6.2008. s.2 of the act covers the ambit and also its applicability to all persons, .....

C.S.Dinesh Babu Vs. the Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... vinod chandran wednesday, the 23rd day of january 2013 3rd magha 193 op(aft).no. 307 of 2013 (z) --------------------------- against the order/judgment in oa.62/2010 of armed forces tribunal,regional bench,kochi dated petitioner(s)/applicant in oa: --------------------------------- c.s.dinesh babu, aged 6 years ex-hav.no.6633559,residing at prasanna hut puthenchantha,varkala,varkala.p.o ..... quarters,dho p.o.,new delhi-1.4. the chief record officer, asc records & supply,bangalore-560 007. r by sri.p.parameswaran nair,asg of india this op (armed forces tribunal - art.227) having come up for admission on 23-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: op(aft).no. 307 of 2013 (z) ..... a6 dated 18-01-1999. annexure a6 order found the petitioner dis-entitled for pension for reason of his having been dismissed under section 20(3) of the army act for reason of being a deserter, on 15-10-1980. that order was challenged earlier before this court in o.p.no.34267/2000, which was rejected by .....

Smt. Nanda Josh Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the army act, 1950, the navy act, 1957 and the air fore act, 1950. sub-section (2) of section 2 of the armed forces tribunal act specifies that "the act shall also apply to retired personnel subject to the army act, 1950 or the navy act, 1957 or the air force act, 1950 including their dependants, heirs and successors, in so far as ..... not for constituting a family court, but only for deployment of staff, etc. therefore, the finding rendered by the tribunal on that score cannot be assailed. it is also submitted that in the light of the provisions of the armed forces tribunals act, 2007, the tribunal is having ample power to go into the respective rights of the family members of army personnel. reliance is placed .....

A. Shihabudeen Vs. the Md, Army Group Insurance Fund and Others

Court : Kerala

..... is multiplicity of litigation for getting retirement benefit to an army person released on disability. the very object of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the act for short) under which the aft is constituted as revealed from its preamble is to provide a forum for settlement of disputes on all service ..... was declined war injury pension and disability benefit under the agif. therefore, the petitioner filed writ petition before this court for relief against the armed forces as well as against the agif. on formation of the armed forces tribunal (aft), the wp(c) was transferred to the aft, kochi bench which vide ext.p3 order allowed the claim of the petitioner on ..... c.n. ramachandran nair, j. 1. order under challenge is one issued by the armed forces tribunal, kochi bench holding that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to settle claims made by army personnel against the army group insurance fund (agif). the petitioner after serving army as a junior commissioned .....

B.M.Ajith Kumar Vs. The Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporatio ...

Court : Kerala

..... became a full fledged army personnel. since the appellant was not a member of armed forces and continued to work as a civilian on deputation to the army postal service, his case was covered under s.14 (1)(a) of the administrative tribunals act. in that view of the matter, the high court was right in rejecting the ..... the petitioner in support of his submission contended that the corporation, i.e. the 1st respondent has not been notified under section 14(2) of the administrative tribunal act, 1985. hence the petitioner who is an employee of the corporation has, however, jurisdiction to approach this court in exercise of writ jurisdiction. it is further ..... writ petition filed by the appellant, whereas the central administrative tribunal erroneously accepted the claim of the appellant that he is an army personnel. we, therefore .....

N. Parameswara Pillai and ors. Vs. Kunchali Lekshmi and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1987Ker282

..... of limitation, and provides for a period of six months from the commencement of the kerala land reforms (amendment) act 1969. there is a further extension of period provided for in the case of a member of armed forces and seaman and legal representatives even after the expiry of the said period up to the date notified under section ..... 22(1), the vesting date in relation to cases coming under that sub-section is postponed, till after the pendency of a resumption application before any court or tribunal or in appeal or revision. a similar benefit is conferred in limited contingencies under section 72(4)(b) also. 16. those small holders who would have bona ..... schedule property, namely 75 cents. he also issued a commission to ascertain the value of improvements and for division of property. aggrieved by the order of the land tribunal, respondents 1 to 6 filed a.a. no. 828 of 1978 before the appellate authority (land reforms) alleppey. before the appellate authority also it was contended by .....

Maria Zacharia Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... matter, the person who thus approached the high court, will also be precluded from filing an appeal under section 30 with leave to appeal under section 31 of the act against the order of the armed forces tribunal as he cannot challenge the order passed by the high court under article 226 of the constitution under section 30 read with section 31 of the ..... situation if the high court entertains a petition under article 226 of the constitution of india against order passed by armed forces tribunal under section 14 or section 15 of the act bypassing the machinery of statute i.e. sections 30 and 31 of the act, there is likelihood of anomalous situation for the aggrieved person in praying for relief from this court. grantedsection section .....

R.K.Kunjappan Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique friday,the1t day of august201410th sravana, 1936 op(aft).no. 18 of 2014 (z) --------------------------- oa.no.40/2014 of armed forces tribunal,regional bench,kochi -------------------------------- petitioner/applicant: ----------------------------------------- r.k.kunjappan, aged74years, s/o.kumaran, ex spr no.1340163, ramadiyil house, murukkumpadam, azheekal p.o., ..... petitioner(s)' exhibits ------------------------------------- exhibit-p1: true copy of o.a.no.40/2014 together with all annexure thereof filed by the petitioner before the armed forces tribunal regional bench, kochi. exhibit-p2: true copy of reply statement dated1305.2014. exhibit-p3: true copy of the service book of the petitioner dated ..... 1963 and while on service he was awarded with punishment under different sections of army act and with effect from 9.8.1972 he was dismissed for the offences under the army act. service rendered by the petitioner has been worked out as 09 years and 06 days .....

Managing Director, Kerala State Beverages Corporation Vs. P.B.Gopi

Court : Kerala

..... assailed by the respondents who were group captain (time scale) in petitions filed by them before the armed forces tribunal, principal bench, new delhi. the grievance made by them was that group captains in the air force constituted one class regardless whether they were promoted to that rank by time scale or on inter se ..... life insurance corporation of india and another etc. v. s.s.srivastava and others [air1987sc1527. in the above case, after enactment of life insurance corporation act, 1956, large number of employees working under different private insurers were taken over by the corporation. the corporation also made appointment of various employees after 01. ..... employees service rules, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'rules, 1986'). there is one more legislation relevant to be noted is the kerala abkari workers welfare fund board act, 1989. a scheme, namely "the kerala abkari workers wa nos.650 of 2015 and conn. cases -:3:- welfare fund board scheme, 1990" (hereinafter referred to .....