Court : Delhi
..... facility was enhanced from then rs. 650 lakhs to 1800 lakhs, in the context of certain supply orders to the tune of rs. 2170.90 lakhs statedly received from armed forces. the enhanced credit facility was availed by dsipl but with no adjustment, putting pnb to a loss of about rs. 29.75 crores. crl. appeal no.143/ ..... of pmla are to be borne in mind, the burden of proving facts contrary to the case of money-laundering being on the person claiming to have acted bonafide.151. the appellate tribunal, in the decision (dated 14.07.2017) earlier rendered (in kolkata case), and followed in the matters from which these appeals have arisen, has also ..... matter of the discourse in the impugned decisions of the appellate tribunal, on account of certain amendments, inter alia, to rdba and sarfaesi act, by the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016 (act no.44 of 2016), which came into force from 01.09.2016. as per the statement of objects .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... facility was enhanced from then rs. 650 lakhs to 1800 lakhs, in the context of certain supply orders to the tune of rs. 2170.90 lakhs statedly received from armed forces. the enhanced credit facility was availed by dsipl but with no adjustment, putting pnb to a loss of about rs. 29.75 crores. crl. appeal no.143/ ..... of pmla are to be borne in mind, the burden of proving facts contrary to the case of money-laundering being on the person claiming to have acted bonafide.151. the appellate tribunal, in the decision (dated 14.07.2017) earlier rendered (in kolkata case), and followed in the matters from which these appeals have arisen, has also ..... matter of the discourse in the impugned decisions of the appellate tribunal, on account of certain amendments, inter alia, to rdba and sarfaesi act, by the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016 (act no.44 of 2016), which came into force from 01.09.2016. as per the statement of objects .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (2004)(165)ELT69TriDel
..... said matter, the canteen stores department of india (csd) which sells the goods manufactured by m/s. lakme lever ltd., through its retail outlets to members of armed forces, requested the appellants to sort and pack the goods in the manner that would attract its customers. for example a carton of lipstick would be sold containing 12 ..... lipsticks of one colour. in the case of csd however, a carton contained 12 assorted colours of lipstick. in view of these facts, the tribunal held that "if the products were already marketable any amount of treatment to enhance its marketability would not amount to manufacture within the meaning of this note. ..... of the commissioner himself, the processing operations undertaken by them on the returned goods does not amount to manufacture in terms of section 2(f) of the act.3.2 he then contended that regarding applicability of note 11 to chapter 29, the commissioner has categorically held that the first two ingredients, dealing with labelling .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... petitioner has laid a challenged to the order dated april 30, 2012 passed by the armed forces tribunal, principal bench, new delhi dismissing ta no.243/2010 filed by the writ petitioner.2. the writ petitioner had prayed before the ..... refuses to grant leave to appeal, the matter could not be reagitated by the petitioner for infirmities in the trial. the tribunal held that the only issue which needed to be considered was whether the postal certificate obtained by the petitioner from the postal ..... and the punishment of being dismissed from service was inflicted upon him. petitioner filed a statutory complaint under section 164 of the army act on august 09, 1994 which was disposed of. he filed wp(c)no.804/1995 in this court in which directions were ..... allegation that the petitioner was tried at a summary court martial for having committed an offence punishable under section 63 of the army act. the charge against him was as under: at field, on 11 feb 94, while performing the duties of head clerk 15 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (2005)(190)ELT301TriDel
..... of power, or is ordinarily so carried on - but does not include a mine subject to the operation of [the mines act, 1952 (35 of 1952] (335 of 111952), or a mobile unit belonging to the armed forced of ht union, railways running shed or a hotel, restaurant or eating place. [explanation (i) - for computing the number ..... circumstances, to hold that molten and broken glass fall outside the scope of item 23a of the first schedule to the central excise & salt act, 1944. (g) the decision of this tribunal in appeal no. e/2386/88, was cited for the proposition that when multiple processes bring about a distinct product they would amount to ..... of tensile steel strippings known as "box strappings".ajit india pvt. ltd., madras v. collector of central excise, bombay/madras reported in 1985 (19) elt 541 (tribunal) was cited for the proposition that the aluminium sections subjected to several processes resulted in bringing into existence complete door frames or window frames or other items and that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... were not socially backward. they were also not educationally backward. it similarly rejected the claim of inadequate representation in public employment, finding them adequately represented in armed forces, government services and educational institutions.11. thereafter, the union cabinet in a meeting held on 02.03.2014 decided that the advice tendered by the ncbc ..... (supra) may be noticed :- "we are of the considered view that there ought to be a permanent body, in the nature of a commission or tribunal, to which complaints of wrong inclusion or non-inclusion of groups, classes and sections in the lists of other backward classes can be made. such body must ..... and to make recommendations as to the steps that should be taken to remove such difficulties and improve their conditions etc.15. the national commission of backward classes act, 1993 was enacted following the decision of this court in indra sawhney & ors. vs. union of india & ors.[1]. which visualised the necessity of establishment .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1957Bom252; (1957)59BOMLR616
..... armed forces. that section makes provision for certain exceptional cases and if the main provision contained in section 32 is not ultra vires, the provision made for exceptional cases cannot also be regarded as ultra vires.35. section 32g provides for publication of notice in the prescribed form in each village within its jurisdiction by the tribunal ..... ineffective and the land will be at the disposal of the collector under section 32p. power is given by sub-section (2) to the tribunal appointed under the act to condone default by the tenant in payment of any four instalments. mr. jahagirdar urged that under section 32k an ordinary tenant is required to ..... no. 18 in the ii list of theseventh schedule to the constitution. theirlordships held in that case that under entryno. 21 the punjab restitution of mortgagedlands act, 1938, which provided for the restitution of possession of lands mortgaged under theact to the mortgagors on less onerous terms andfor the extinguishment of the mortgages, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3575
..... before the registrar's nominee itself, in case the remedy under order 9, rule 13, was available or an appeal to the co-operative tribunal. the registrar has no authority under the act of 1960 to hear the appeals either from his own nominee or for that matter from the assistant registrar. concededly, the registrar had also no ..... walavalkar and smt. arundhati anant dessai. learned counsel further submits that against the award dated 26.8.1995 the respondent no. 3 ought to have approached the co-operative tribunal, or high court in extra ordinary jurisdiction. he further submits that no provision of law was ever mentioned under which, the appeal was filed, before the registrar. learned ..... parte award dated 26.8.1995. that award, since it was passed in terms of section 91 of the act of 1960 could have been challenged before the co-operative tribunal, panaji goa, in terms of section 97 of the act of 1960. the said award dated 26.8.1995 was allowed to attain finality.11. thereafter, the bank .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 1997ACJ1392; ILR1996KAR975; 1996(2)KarLJ191
..... the governor.(4) nothing in this article shall be deemed to confer on a high court powers of superintendence over any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the armed forces.'23. a plain reading of the extracted provisions shows that the power of superintendence conferred on the high court part-i of article ..... to do so, the court may even in such a case intervene and issue requisite directions in exercise of its power of superintendence, compelling the court or tribunal to act and discharge the duty enjoined upon it by the law under which it functions. the impugned circulars do not fit in or answer any one of these two ..... district & sessions judge. the compulsion created by the notification, it was contended was offensive to the statutory option given to the claimants by section 166 of the act, rendering the notification illegal. i find no substance in this argument either. section 166 no doubt gives to the claimants the option of instituting the claim petitions with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2006(5)KarLJ353
..... provides for a notice in the case of a soldier in service (at any time not later than one year) from the date on which he is released from the armed forces or is sent to the reserve.in the case of seaman, within one year from the date on which he ceases to be a seaman.in the event of the ..... 1959 itself. in view of the application alleged to have been filed by respondent no. 3 under section 15 of the act, the land tribunal referred the matter to the tahsildar for adjudication of the same under section 15 of the act. the tahsildar, thereafter has rejected the application of the 3rd respondent in terms of an order dated 13.3.2000. aggrieved ..... challenged by the 3rd respondent in w.p.no. 1553/1983. petition was allowed. matter was remanded. the 3rd respondent stated before the tribunal that he had filed an application under section 15 of the karnataka land reforms act, inter-alia, for resumption of the lands in question, as he is an ex-serviceman and has retired from the army on 31 .....
Tag this Judgment!