Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
..... apex court of india. in this context, we would like to refer that central administrative tribunal cannot be compared with that of the armed forces tribunal constituted under armed forces tribunal act 2007 (act 55 of 2007). the preamble to the armed forces tribunal act 2007 reads as follows:- an act to provide for the adjudication or trial by armed forces tribunal of disputes and complaints with respect to commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in ..... respect of persons subject to the army act, 1950, the navy act, 1957 and the air force act, 1950 and also to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 16 may, 2006 chairman, 26 vaisakha, 1928 (saka)standing committee on defence."14. therefore, it is clear from the scheme of the act that jurisdiction of the tribunal constituted under the armed forces tribunal act is in substitution of the jurisdiction of civil court and the high court so far as it relates to suit relating to condition of service ..... the learned senior counsel for the respondent-army personnel.5. for the determination of the present issue it is necessary to refer the relevant provisions of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, the power of the high court under sections 226 and 227 of the constitution, and the power of supreme court under articles 32 and 136 ..... of the writ petition on the ground that against the orders impugned a remedy of appeal to the supreme court is provided under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007.3. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the union of india submitted that the high court cannot entertain writ petitions under article 226 of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
writ petition no.3906/2012 (s) 20.7.2012 counsel for the parties present. this petition, under article 226 of the constitution, is directed against the order dated 15.2.2012 passed by the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioner s original application no.246/2010. as the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the supreme court under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. the petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. the certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. certified copy as per rules. (ajit singh) (sanjay yadav) judge judge ps
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
w.p.no.8954/2013 21/6/2013: shri k.c.ghildayal, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri r.s.siddique, learned assistant solicitor general for the respondents on advance notice. in the light of orders already passed by a co-ordinate bench of this court under similar circumstances in w.p.no.7926/2010 (s) on 20.7.2012 holding that against an order passed by the armed forces tribunal, the remedy of appeal to the supreme court under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 is available, we see no reason to take a different view and entertain this petition. accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.to the remedy available under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, this petition is disposed of. (rajendra menon) (anil sharma) judge judge mrs.mishra
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
writ petition no.10186/2010 (s) 20.7.2012 counsel for the parties present. this petition, under articles 226/227 of the constitution, is directed against the order dated 24.5.2010 passed by the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioner s original application no.35/2010. as the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the supreme court under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. the petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. the certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. certified copy as per rules. (ajit singh) (sanjay yadav) judge judge ps
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
writ petition no.4553/2011 (s) 20.7.2012 counsel for the parties present. this petition, under articles 226/227 of the constitution, is directed against the order dated 10.1.2011 passed by the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioner s transferred application no.300/2010. as the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the supreme court under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. the petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. the certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. certified copy as per rules. (ajit singh) (sanjay yadav) judge judge ps
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
writ petition no.957/2012 20.7.2012 counsel for the parties present. this petition, under article 226 of the constitution, is directed against the order dated 21.10.2011 passed by the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioner s transferred application no.932/2010. as the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the supreme court under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. the petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. the certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. certified copy as per rules. (ajit singh) (sanjay yadav) judge judge ps
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
writ petition no.1776/2012 (s) 20.7.2012 counsel for the parties present. this petition, under article 226 of the constitution, is directed against the order dated 26.11.2010 passed by the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioner s transferred application no.438/2010. as the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the supreme court under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. the petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. the certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. certified copy as per rules. (ajit singh) (sanjay yadav) judge judge ps
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
writ petition no.6176/2011 (s) 20.7.2012 counsel for the parties present. this petition, under article 227 of the constitution, is directed against the order dated 8.3.2011 passed by the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioner s transferred application no.325/2010. as the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the supreme court under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. the petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. the certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. certified copy as per rules. (ajit singh) (sanjay yadav) judge judge ps
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
writ petition no.7296/2010 (s) 20.7.2012 counsel for the parties present. this petition, under articles 226/227 of the constitution, is directed against the order dated 24.5.2010 passed by the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioner s original application no.35/2010. as the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the supreme court under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. the petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. the certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. certified copy as per rules. (ajit singh) (sanjay yadav) judge judge ps
Tag this Judgment!