Arbitral - Judgment Search Results

In Re: Arbitral Award Dated 25th June, 2007 Passed by the Sole Arbitra ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(6)BomCR775

retirement of this Opponent is not referred to the present Arbitral Tribunal. In view thereof this opponent does not desire to

C. Kaliappan Vs. 1.The Arbitrator and

Court: Chennai

MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD).No.5552 of 2013 C. KALIAPPAN :Petitioner -Vs- 1.THE ARBITRATOR AND DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, KARUR DISTRICT.

Vimal Madhukar Wasnik (Dr.) Vs. Sole Arbitrator, the Honourable Shri J ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(1)ALLMR254; 2006(1)ARBLR255(Bom); 2006(1)BomCR419

the Advocate. Accordingly on 28th February, 1998 he attended the arbitral proceedings along with Shri S.P. Dharmadhikari Advocate and represented the

G.V. Revanna and anr. Vs. the Arbitrator (Co-operative Development Off ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2006(2)KarLJ227

Authority, in turn has referred the matter to the Departmental Arbitrator-first respondent herein and the first respondent hereinafter conducting enquiry and

Fishermen Co-operative Society Vs. Arbitrator/Assistant Director of Fi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(5)ALD450; 2007(6)ALT174

2345 of 1995, directed that the same be resolved through arbitration, under Section 61 of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act (for

Navodaya Mass Entertainments Ltd. Rep. by Its Chairman Vs. M. Vaidyana ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006]129CompCas697(Mad); (2005)3MLJ131

for a writ of Certiorari against the order of the Arbitrator dated 27.10.2003. By that order, the preliminary objection of the

The Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director Vs. t ...

Court: Allahabad

to give rise to a dispute for initiating the present arbitral proceedings though the same to my mind is only a

Stephen Koenig Vs. Arbitrator, National Internet

Court: Delhi

25th November 2006 to the .IN Registry enquiring about the arbitral Award. By a letter dated 5th December 2006, received in

P.M.Muhammadali Vs. the Arbitrator (National Highways Act 1956)

Court: Kerala

TALUK, KODUNGALLUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS : ---------------------------------------------------- 1. THE ARBITRATOR (NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT, 1956), AND DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL LINES, COLLECTORATE,

Subaida P.a Vs. the Arbitrator and Co-operativce Inspector

Court: Kerala

KOTAPARAMBU, KODUNGALLUR. BY ADVS.SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE ARBITRATOR & CO-OPERATIVCE INSPECTOR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(G) OFFICE KODUNGALLUR-680