Stephen vs the Arbitrator

Stephen vs The Arbitrator

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 16, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1302657

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1302657
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.
Decided On: Feb 16, 2024
Case Number: WP(C)/26456/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Stephen

Respondent

The Arbitrator

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. friday, the 16th day of february 2024 / 27th magha, 1945 petitioner: stephen, aged 63 years, s/o. varappan, kooliyath house, methala village, kottappuram p.o., kodungallur. by adv sri.sunny mathew respondent: the arbitrator, (district collector), thrissur-680 001. sri.venugopal v, gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 16.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthis writ petition has been filed being aggrieved by the fact that no orders have been passed on an application filed by the petitioner before the respondent under the provisions of section 3g of the national highways act, 1956.2. when this matter is taken up for consideration today, itis the submission of the learned government pleader that the application filed by the petitioner before the respondent under section 3g of the national highways act, 1956 has been considered and disposed of and, therefore, nothing further survives for consideration in the writ petition. taking into consideration of the submission of the learned government pleader and considering the relief sought for in the writ petition, i am of the view that nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition. it is accordingly closed. sd/- gopinath p. judge dk appendix of wp(c) 26456/2014 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1: true copy of the objection submitted by the petitioner before the respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 27TH MAGHA, 1945 PETITIONER: STEPHEN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O. VARAPPAN, KOOLIYATH HOUSE, METHALA VILLAGE, KOTTAPPURAM P.O., KODUNGALLUR. BY ADV SRI.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENT: THE ARBITRATOR, (DISTRICT COLLECTOR), THRISSUR-680 001. SRI.VENUGOPAL V, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed being aggrieved by the fact that no orders have been passed on an application filed by the petitioner before the respondent under the provisions of Section 3G of the National Highways Act, 1956.

2. When this matter is taken up for consideration today, it

is the submission of the learned Government Pleader that the application filed by the petitioner before the respondent under Section 3G of the National Highways Act, 1956 has been considered and disposed of and, therefore, nothing further survives for consideration in the writ petition. Taking into consideration of the submission of the learned Government Pleader and considering the relief sought for in the writ petition, I am of the view that nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition. It is accordingly closed. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26456/2014 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2024 Same Parties Stephen vs The Arbitrator Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.