Appropriation - Judgment Search Results

Appropriate Authority Vs. Mass Traders Private Ltd.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1993)111CTR(Kar)294; ILR1993KAR1018

an application in Form No. 37-1 was filed before the Appropriate Authority seeking permission for effecting the registration of sale. The

The Appropriate Authority and anr. Vs. Smt. Sudha Patil and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1998)150CTR(SC)405

the value of the property. The said order of the Appropriate Authority was assailed by respondent no. 1, the proposed transferee,

Appropriate Authority Vs. Rasiklal M. Dhariwal and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2005)193CTR(Guj)377; [2005]277ITR370(Guj)

there was no illegality either on the part of the Appropriate Authority while making the above submission in the affidavit-in- reply

Appropriate Authority Vs. Rasiklal M. Dhariwal and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2005]144TAXMAN704(Guj)

per the orders of this court and that, when the Appropriate Authority analysed the provisions of law, the Authority was of

Appropriate Authority, Government of India Vs. Naresh M. Mehta

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1992)101CTR(Mad)433; [1993]200ITR773(Mad); (1992)IMLJ572

19. We also find that in Mrs. Satwant Narang v. Appropriate Authority : [1991]188ITR656(Delhi) referred to above also, it was held

The Appropriate Authority, Government of India, Income-tax Department ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1992)1MLJ572

He also relied on the decisions in Mrs.Satwant Narang v. Appropriate Authority 188 L.T.R. 656, of Delhi High Court and Kelvin

District Appropriate Authority Under The Pndt Act And Chief District H ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

redundant.6. Being aggrieved by the order of Learned Single Judge, appropriate authority challenged the same by filing the Letters Patent Appeal

Appropriate Authority and Commissioner Income Tax Vs. Smt. Varshaben B ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1339; (2001)166CTR(SC)373; [2001]248ITR342(SC); JT2001(3)SC468; 2001(2)SCALE411; (2001)4SCC1; [2001]2SCR349

to contend that Section 269UD had no application and the appropriate authority had no Jurisdiction. 7. Section 269UA defines certain terms

Appropriate Authroity and anr. Vs. Kailash Suneja and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2821; (2001)169CTR(SC)401; [2001]251ITR1(SC); JT2001(6)SC252; 2001(5)SCALE99; (2001)6SCC563; [2001]118TAXMAN295(SC)

more than 15 percent of the fair market value, the Appropriate Authority had jurisdiction to interfere with the same.5. The High

Appropriate Authority of Income-tax and ors. Vs. Vysya Bank Ltd. and a ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2000]244ITR318(Cal)

: [1993]201ITR681(SC) , and the decision in the case of Appropriate Authority v. Smt. Sudha Patil : [1999]235ITR118(SC) .5. Learned counsel