Appropriate Authority and anr. Vs. Vijay Kumar Sharma

Appropriate Authority and anr. vs Vijay Kumar Sharma

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Nov 16, 2000

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/666619

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/666619
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: S.P. Bharucha,; D.P. Mohapatra and; S.N. Phukan, JJ.
Decided On: Nov 16, 2000
Subject: Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890.Sections 366-A & 376(2): [Dr.Arijit Pasayat & A.K.Ganguly,JJ] Abduction and rape of minor - Appreciation of evidence - Failure to appreciate evidence properly - Effect of, on trial and conviction In the present case, prosecutrix in her examination-in-chief not recognising the appellant as s...

Key legal issue: Direct Taxation
Acts & sections: Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD and 269UD(1A)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appropriate Authority and anr.

Advocate S.W.A. Quadri,; S.K. Dwivedi and; Sushma Suri, Advs

Respondent

Vijay Kumar Sharma

Advocate M.L. Verma, Sr. Adv., ; Kavin Gulati, ; A.K. Verma, ;

Legal References

Acts: Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD and 269UD(1A)
Cases Referred: Vijay Kumar Sharma v. Appropriate Authority
Reported In: (2001)168CTR(SC)611; [2001]249ITR554(SC)

Excerpt

- indian penal code, 1890.sections 366-a & 376(2): [dr.arijit pasayat & a.k.ganguly,jj] abduction and rape of minor - appreciation of evidence - failure to appreciate evidence properly - effect of, on trial and conviction in the present case, prosecutrix in her examination-in-chief not recognising the appellant as she had never seen him - held, trial court and high court ignored the statement of the victim. hence, conviction of appellant was set aside.order under section 269udreasonable opportunity of hearing not given to partiescatch note:there was so gross a breach of principles of natural justice that high court was right in setting aside order and not remitting matter back to appropriate authority.case law analysis:decision of the allahabad high court in vijay kumar sharma v. appropriate authority (1996) 220 itr 509 (all) affirmed.application:also to current assessment year.decision:in favour of respondents.income tax act 1961 s.269ud

Full Judgment

ORDER

UNDER SECTION 269UDReasonable opportunity of hearing not given to parties

Catch Note:

There was so gross a breach of principles of natural justice that High Court was right in setting aside order and not remitting matter back to appropriate authority.

Case Law Analysis:

Decision of the Allahabad High Court in Vijay Kumar Sharma v. Appropriate Authority (1996) 220 ITR 509 (All) affirmed.

Application:

Also to current assessment year.

Decision:

In favour of respondents.

Income Tax Act 1961 s.269UD

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2000 Same Parties Appropriate Authority and anr. vs Vijay Kumar Sharma Same Subject Direct Taxation Same Judge S.P. Bharucha,; D.P. Mohapatra and; S.N. Phukan, JJ. Acts & Sections Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD and 269UD(1A)

Direct Taxation