Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR742; 1987MhLJ63
..... may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and ..... learned judge observed that there did not appear to be any collusion between the parties and the policy of the law having undergone a change after the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, it is possible now to dissolve a marriage by agreement between the parties although none of the grounds, on which a marriage may be dissolved by a ..... compromise application for grant of decree for divorce by mutual consent, they must be deemed to have asked for an amendment of the application and when the court acted upon it, it must be deemed to have allowed the amendment. the second objection before the high court was about not making the motion as required by section 13-b and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2010(2)KLT459
..... marriage may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the indian divorce (amendment) act, 2001, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of two years or more, that they have not been able to live together and they have ..... divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live ..... . smt. jeejabai 1986 klj 833 (d.b.)2. k.k. anirudhan v. t. prasanna kumari 1989 (1) klt 42 : 1989 (1) hlr ker. 682 (single bench)3. rekharani v. prabhu 2007 (3) klt 917 (d.b.)18. this view that the period of waiting cannot be waived, we find, has been taken by other high courts also. we refer to three .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... presents the question whether the pre-emption provision of the employee retirement income security act of 1974 (erisa), 88 stat. 829, as amended, 29 u. s. c. 1001 et seq., supersedes california's prevailing wage law to the extent that the law prohibits payment of an apprentice wage to an apprentice trained in an unapproved program. we conclude that california's law does not ..... "relate to" employee benefit plans, and thus is not pre-empted. i a since 1931, the davis-bacon act, 46 stat. 1494, as amended, 40 u. s. c. 276a to 276a-5, has required that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1996)ILLJ376Mad
..... where they have undergone training. 3. in the light of the orders of government in the said government order and subsequent amendment issued in their letter fourth cited, the absorption of apprentices in the board after their successful completion of apprenticeship training in the tamil nadu electricity board has been re-examined and after ..... ltd), the division bench of the delhi high court had an occasion to consider the scope of section 22 of the act and it was held therein that the trained apprentices under the apprentices act have a legitimate expectation and interest to seek employment and recognise a legal remedy, against a public undertaking which is an ..... cannot lose sight of the fact that as a matter of policy to be adopted on an all india basis after the coming into force of the apprentices act, 1961, the government of india, ministry of labour and rehabilitation, has issued guidelines and the state government merely undertook follow up action by issuing directions to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... finding of the cgit was erroneous since the definition of the term 2(s) of the i.d.act had undergone change by an amendment made by central act 46 of 1982. the term 'workman' includes even an apprentice and therefore, it is unnecessary for him to prove that he was a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the i. ..... are as follows:-the workman claimed that he joined the services of the bank on 10.07.1981. he was kept as an unpaid apprentice clerk at their erode branch. he was not covered by the provisions of apprentices act, 1961. he claimed that he had rendered two years of continuous service. when fresh employment was notified during the year 1987, the ..... d.act as on the alleged date of termination, this amendment had already come into force. to that extent, the cgit was erroneous in non-suiting the workman. but .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : [1991(62)FLR265]; (1992)ILLJ639All; (1991)1UPLBEC203
..... officer or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.' section 2(s), central act (subsequent to amendment by central act no. 46 of 1982):'workman' means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, un-skilled, skilled, technical, operational, supervisory work for hire or ..... amplitude.(i) the word 'workman' as defined under the two enactments reads as under: -section 2(s), central act (prior to amendment by central act no. 46 of 1982):'workman' means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any skilled or unskilled manual, supervisory, technical or clerical work for hire or reward ..... work is skilled or unskilled manual, but after amendment, the category of manual work is separated and now it is 'manual, unskilled, skilled' and a new category of operational work was also added.section 2(z) of u.p. act:'workman' means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any skilled .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... bcci from permitting respondent no.2 - sri n. srinivasan to participate in the general body meeting but in the second application he sought 92injunction against the amendment introduced by pleading to put it under suspension.9. however, the main thrust of the argument of learned counsel for the plaintiff/appellant all through in the ..... the conclusion that the suits are not maintainable. therefore, the appellant is not entitled to any interim relief. the amendment impugned is not found to be contrary to the provisions of the tamil nadu societies registration act, 1975. similarly, the appellant has failed to establish that because of so called conflict of interest, the respondent no ..... invitation to india cements limited based at chennai and represented by its managing director mr. n. srinivasan, who is respondent no. 2 herein, on december 29, 2007, to participate in the auction conducted by ipl. it may be mentioned that at that time the respondent no. 2 was also the honorary treasurer of bcci .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... of 2007. the defendant no.9 filed r.f.a. crob no.2 of 2008. a division bench of this court, by judgment dated 16th april 2010 allowed the appeal and held that the plaintiffs are entitled to 1/7th share in all the properties in the light of section 6 of the hindu succession (amendment) act 39 ..... (2016)2 scc36and danamma @ suman surpur vs. amar, 23 (2018)3 scc343with regard to interpretation of section 6 of the hindu succession act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the act), as amended by hindu succession (amendment) act of 2005 and therefore, the matter has been referred for consideration by a larger bench. in response, learned counsel for the appellant submitted ..... that the propositus namely yashwant upadhye had expired on 18.02.1988 i.e., prior to commencement of the hindu succession (amendment) act, 2005 with effect from 09.09.2005 and, with reference to the averments made in the plaint, it was pointed out that the appellant has confined the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... of 2007. the defendant no.9 filed r.f.a. crob no.2 of 2008. a division bench of this court, by judgment dated 16th april 2010 allowed the appeal and held that the plaintiffs are entitled to 1/7th share in all the properties in the light of section 6 of the hindu succession (amendment) act 39 ..... (2016)2 scc36and danamma @ suman surpur vs. amar, 23 (2018)3 scc343with regard to interpretation of section 6 of the hindu succession act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the act), as amended by hindu succession (amendment) act of 2005 and therefore, the matter has been referred for consideration by a larger bench. in response, learned counsel for the appellant submitted ..... that the propositus namely yashwant upadhye had expired on 18.02.1988 i.e., prior to commencement of the hindu succession (amendment) act, 2005 with effect from 09.09.2005 and, with reference to the averments made in the plaint, it was pointed out that the appellant has confined the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... immovable property, it would come within the ambit of residuary clause (c) of article 5 of schedule 1 of ista, which is extended to union territory of delhi by delhi amendment act of 2001. the stamp duty as per residuary clause (c) of article 5 thereof is rs.50/-. the agreement to sell in question being on stamp paper of rs.10 ..... is the defendant s case that the agreement to sell was required to be stamped as per article 23a of schedule 1a of indian stamp (delhi amendment) act, 2001 and as per this provision stamp duty equivalent to 90 per cent of the duty as conveyance was payable, and further that in the absence of the same this ..... . opal metal engineering pvt. ltd. air2009delhi 1 and shri rakesh chandok vs. smt. harbans kaur (i.a. no.5540/2005 in cs(os) no.1281/2004, decided on 30.04.2007) and the decision of punjab and haryana high court in sukhwinder kaur vs. amarjit singhand others air2012p&h97 7. as is apparent from the written statement, all the pleas which .....
Tag this Judgment!