Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: apprentices amendment act 2007 section 2 insertion of new section 3b Court: chennai Page 1 of about 28 results (0.100 seconds)

P. Arul and 237 ors. Vs. Tamil Nadu State Electricity Board and 22 ors ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)ILLJ376Mad

..... where they have undergone training. 3. in the light of the orders of government in the said government order and subsequent amendment issued in their letter fourth cited, the absorption of apprentices in the board after their successful completion of apprenticeship training in the tamil nadu electricity board has been re-examined and after ..... ltd), the division bench of the delhi high court had an occasion to consider the scope of section 22 of the act and it was held therein that the trained apprentices under the apprentices act have a legitimate expectation and interest to seek employment and recognise a legal remedy, against a public undertaking which is an ..... cannot lose sight of the fact that as a matter of policy to be adopted on an all india basis after the coming into force of the apprentices act, 1961, the government of india, ministry of labour and rehabilitation, has issued guidelines and the state government merely undertook follow up action by issuing directions to .....

N.Krishnamoorthy Vs. City Union Bank Rep. by Its General Manager

Court : Chennai

..... finding of the cgit was erroneous since the definition of the term 2(s) of the i.d.act had undergone change by an amendment made by central act 46 of 1982. the term 'workman' includes even an apprentice and therefore, it is unnecessary for him to prove that he was a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the i. ..... are as follows:-the workman claimed that he joined the services of the bank on 10.07.1981. he was kept as an unpaid apprentice clerk at their erode branch. he was not covered by the provisions of apprentices act, 1961. he claimed that he had rendered two years of continuous service. when fresh employment was notified during the year 1987, the ..... d.act as on the alleged date of termination, this amendment had already come into force. to that extent, the cgit was erroneous in non-suiting the workman. but .....

M. Ramani and Others Vs. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Chennai

..... open market, that is, if all things are equal, then and then alone, the trained apprentice is entitled for preference. 24. an argument was advanced stating that the apprentice act as amended vide amendment act, 2014 has crystallized the rights of the petitioners in a more definite manner. the amended section 22(1) of the act states that every employer shall formulate its own policy for recruiting any ..... considered in public service commission uttaranchal vs. jagdish chandra singh bora and anr., etc., in civil appeal nos.3034 and 3036 of 2007 and the hon'ble supreme court, while interpreting the condition other things be equal, a trained apprentice should be given preference over direct recruits held that the only natural meaning for the aforesaid phrase other things be equal is .....

Management of Secales Limited, Rep. by General Manager (Operations) Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR482]; (2004)IIILLJ160Mad; (2004)2MLJ631

..... workmen's right to approach the labour court even in respect of the orders of dismissal etc. passed prior to the amendment act. this legal position was also not seriously challenged by the management. therefore, the rejection of the claim of the apprentices for these reasons, namely, the retrospective operation of the section and laches cannot be sustained.8. next, we will have ..... dispute was not maintainable since section 2-a(ii) of industrial disputes act was not retrospective and could not be invoked in respect of a dispute which arose before the amendment came into force and (2) also that the claim should be rejected on the ground of laches. therefore, these apprentices would also be entitled to reinstatement.7. in k, rama rao v .....

Management of Kali Material Handling Systems Vs. Regional Provident Fu ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1418Mad

..... paragraph 2(f) of the employees' provident funds scheme, that only apprentices under the certified standing orders, were excluded from the provisions of the act when only even the amendment to section 2(f) of the act included 'apprentices other than apprentices under the apprentices act, 1961, or under the standing orders of the establishment' by the amendment act of 1988 which came into force from august, 1988. it is ..... also contended by the petitioners that the respondent failed to see that the model standing orders provide for engagement of apprentices with apprenticeship period extending .....

M.Kumar Vs. M.Mohankumar

Court : Chennai

..... to the date of filing of the original plaint, in view of the clear bar under article 54 of the limitation act. here in this case, the inclusion of the plea of specific performance by way of amendment virtually alters the character of the suit, and its pecuniary jurisdiction had gone up and the plaint had to be transferred ..... sum of rs.30 lakhs. according to the respondents, they never agreed to sell the property to the applicant. it is further case of the respondents that after december-2007, the applicant has not paid the rent, by taking advantage of the absence of the respondents in india. hence, the respondents 1 & 2 initiated rco.proceedings for ..... applicant's wife and the respondents. the respondents 1 & 2 are the non-resident indians and they are residing in canada. taking advantage of their absence, from december-2007 the tenant has not paid the rent. the respondents 1 & 2 never orally agreed to sell the suit property. the applicant is squatting over the suit property without paying .....

Videowala Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1987Mad52

..... filed under art. 226 of the constitution to seek the issue of a writ of declaration to declare certain provisions of the copyright (amendment) act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the amendment act) insofar as they relate to the petitioner - video library, as void and unconstitutional.3. having regard to the limited question for consideration ..... the interests and calculations of the film producers, distributors and exhibitors. even so, the challenge made by the writ petitioner to certain provisions of the amendment act is with reference to the constitutional validity of those provisions. it is not on the ground of hardship or equity the validity of the provisions are ..... as the public exchequer, that as such, the film producers, distributors and exhibitors are as much interested as the government in the validity of the amendment act being upheld, that since the federation has been formed to safeguard the interests of the film producers, distributors and exhibitors it has locus standi to get .....

State Lorry Owners' Federation, Tamil Nadu, 87, Salem Road, Namakkal-6 ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC671; (1999)IMLJ29

..... within which the national highways is situated, subject to such conditions if any, as may be specified in the notification. as per section 7 of the act, as amended by national highways amendment act, 1977, the central government may levy fees at such rates as may be laid down by the rules for services or benefits in relation to the ..... government was authorised to construct and maintain the high level bridge across the river thirumanimutharu near paramathi-velur. as per section 7 of the national highways amendment act, 1977 (act 30 of 1977), the central government may levy fees at such rates as may be laid down by the rules for services or benefits in relation ..... 11. as rightly contended by the learned special government pleader, the tamil nadu motor vehicles taxation act, 1974 is an act to consolidate and amend the law relating to levy of tax on motor vehicles in the state of tamil nadu. the said act deals with the tax on vehicles. however, the collection of fee under the national highways .....

State Lorry Owners' Federation Vs. the Superintending Engineer (NH)

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1999)1MLJ29

..... which the national highways is situated, subject to such conditions if any, as may be specified in the notification. as per section 7 of the act, as amended by national highways (amendment) act, 1977, the central government may levy fees at such rates as may be laid down by the rules for services or benefits in relation to the ..... government was authorised to construct and maintain the high level bridge across the river thirumanimutharu near paramathi velur. as per section 7 of the national highways (amendment) act, 1977 (act 30 of 1977), the central government may levy fees at such rates as may be laid down by the rules for services or benefits in relation to ..... 11. as rightly contended by the learned special government pleader, the tamil nadu motor vehicles taxation act, 1974 is an act to consolidate and amend the law relating to levy the tax on motor vehicles in the state of tamil nadu. the said act deals with the tax on vehicles. however, the collection of fee is made' under the national .....

Devivanai Ammal and 12 ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC483

..... it was served on the petitioners on 5.10,1986. according to the respondents, the award has been passed within two years from the date of commencement of the amendment act and hence, the statutory condition regarding the passing of the award has been fully complied with on the facts of the case. learned counsel for the petitioners placed ..... all cases. learned government advocate pointed out that the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984 came into effect on 24.9.1984 and the award passed on 23.9.1986 was well within the time. according to the learned government advocate the ..... no award was passed as regards survey no. 9/2, and since the award was not passed within two years from the date of commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984, (he entire acquisition proceedings would lapse).7. learned government advocate produced before me the file and contended that the award was passed on 23.9.1986 in .....