Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: apprentices amendment act 2007 section 2 insertion of new section 3b Court: delhi Page 1 of about 66 results (0.178 seconds)

Vinod Kumar and anr. Vs. Ajit Singh

Court : Delhi

..... immovable property, it would come within the ambit of residuary clause (c) of article 5 of schedule 1 of ista, which is extended to union territory of delhi by delhi amendment act of 2001. the stamp duty as per residuary clause (c) of article 5 thereof is rs.50/-. the agreement to sell in question being on stamp paper of rs.10 ..... is the defendant s case that the agreement to sell was required to be stamped as per article 23a of schedule 1a of indian stamp (delhi amendment) act, 2001 and as per this provision stamp duty equivalent to 90 per cent of the duty as conveyance was payable, and further that in the absence of the same this ..... . opal metal engineering pvt. ltd. air2009delhi 1 and shri rakesh chandok vs. smt. harbans kaur (i.a. no.5540/2005 in cs(os) no.1281/2004, decided on 30.04.2007) and the decision of punjab and haryana high court in sukhwinder kaur vs. amarjit singhand others air2012p&h97 7. as is apparent from the written statement, all the pleas which .....

Anil BhasIn Vs. Vijay Kumar BhasIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003(67)DRJ174

..... the existing list of immovable properties. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....'3. the objection of the defendant is that the averments sought to be included by amendment, are hit by the benami transactions (prohibition) act 1988, and as such cannot be allowed. reliance is placed upon the decision of the hon'ble himachal high court in the case reported as dr. ..... a benami transaction in the name of the defendant is clearly prohibited by the benami transaction (prohibition) act, 1988 (act no. 45 of 1988). may be that it is an additional approach for getting the same relief but no amendment can be allowed having the effect of allowing an additional plea to be raised which is prohibited by ..... the benefit of the person buying or providing the consideration as was the position prior to the amendment of 1988.16. at the same time, there exists the provisions of section 4(3)(b) of the benami transactions act 1988, being in the nature of a proviso excluding from the prohibition, the right to recover .....

Anil BhasIn Vs. Vijay Kumar BhasIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(2003)BC247

..... the existing list of immovable properties. ..... ..... .......... ..... .....' 3. the objection of the defendant is that the averments sought to be included by amendment, are hit by the benami transactions (prohibition) act 1988, and as such cannot be allowed. reliance is placed upon the decision of the hon'ble himachal high court in the case reported as dr. ..... a benami transaction in the name of the defendant is clearly prohibited by the benami transactions (prohibition) act, 1988 (act no. 45 of 1988). may be that it is an additional approach for getting the same relief but no amendment can be allowed having the effect of allowing an additional plea to be raised which is prohibited ..... for the benefit of the person buying or providing the consideration as was the position prior to the amendment of 1988. 16. at the same time, there exists the provisions of section 4(3)(b) of the benami transactions act, 1988, being in the nature of a proviso excluding from the prohibition, the right to recover .....

Hardwari Lal Sharma vs.pustak Mahal Publishers

Court : Delhi

..... , or air service of the crown. lpa6162012 page 5 of 11 14. the definition was amended by amending act 36 of 1956 which came into force from 29th august, 1956 to read as follows : (s) "workman" means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any skilled or unskilled manual, supervisory technical or clerical work ..... not exceed rs.500. lpa6162012 page 6 of 11 the definition of 'workman' was further amended by amending act 46 of 1982 which was brought into force w.e.f. 21.8.1984. it read as : (s) workman means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or ..... judge dated 6th august, 2012 passed in wp(c) no.1333/2008 titled as pustak mahal publishers vs. hardwari lal sharma whereby the award dated 10th july, 2007 passed by the learned presiding officer, labour court- ii directing reinstatement of appellant with continuity of service and 50% back wages and all other benefits was set .....

M/s. Symphony Ltd. Vs. M/s. Summer Cool Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Delhi

..... court in pirgonda hongonda patil v. kalgonda shidgonda patil air 1957 sc 363, while interpreting the said provision held that two conditions need to be satisfied to allow the amendment sought which are (a) not working injustice to the other side, and (b)of being necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties ..... reference to the said models, is with regard to the design referred to against the said model in para 12. that apart, it is his case, that if the amendments are allowed, that would be to the prejudice of the defendants and also, the right, which has accrued to the defendants for challenging the registration, obtained by the plaintiff ..... , the merit of the amendments sought would not be gone into. further, to say that the right of the defendant under section 19 and 22 of the design s act would be effected in not appealing. if at the end of the trial, the defendant still succeeds to establish its case, as being argued now, the right under .....

M/s. SICPA India Private Limited Vs. Kapil Kumar and Others

Court : Delhi

..... loan facility balances shall be secured by any or all of the following: securities mean securities as defined under section 2(h) of the securities contract regulation act, 1956 (as amended from time to time) and also includes debentures, bonds, rbi relief bonds deposits, collateralized debt obligations and securitised debt instruments units of mutual funds etc. ..... suit. (underlining by us) 12.37. in this regard, mr. vikas arora has placed the pronouncement reported at air 2007 allahabad 29, bhu deo v. district judge, etah and ors., wherein the amendment was rejected for the reasons that firstly, it was sought at a very late stage without giving any explanation whatsoever for not ..... on the limited judicial resources, which it is compelled to spend unnecessary time thereon. 24.26. this was also noted by this court in the judgments reported at 138 (2007) dct 62, goyal mg gases pvt. ltd. v. air liquid deutchland gambh and ors. and ilr (2012) iv del 110, punjab national bank v. virendra prakash .....

Dhanjit Vadra Vs. Smt. Beena Vadra

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1990Delhi146; 1990(18)DRJ199; 1990RLR167

..... may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, where such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that ..... bench of the punjab and haryana court allowed a miscellaneous application filed in an appeal and allowed the original divorce petition to be amended to treat the same as petition under section 13-b of the act and granted a decree for dissolution of the marriage by mutual consent on the basis of an agreement reached between the parties during ..... as one for grant of a decree of divorce by mutual consent 'they must be deemed to have asked for amendment of that application and when the court acted upon it, it must be deemed to have allowed the amendment'. since it was abundantly clear that the parties did not want to live together and were desirous of getting a .....

Chander Kanta Vs. Hans Kumar and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi73; 1988(14)DRJ337; 1988RLR297

..... a different matter because in such a case the court is empowered specifically to refuse to grant the decree. the legislature introduced section 13b in the act by marriage law (amendment) act 1976 to provide for a speedy dissolution of marriage when it is found that the marriage is irretrievable. the legislature provided for an interval of a ..... be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together ..... without evidence and thus by order dated 1st october 1986 fixed the case for evidence. the petitioner thereafter filed an application under section 115 of the evidence act read with section 114 of the code of civil procedure (hereinafter referred to as the code) for review of the order dated 1st october 1986 contending therein .....

Kirti Azad vs.narinder Batra & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... and, until so defined shall be those of that house and of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of section 15 of the constitution (forty fourth amendment) act 1978 (4) the provisions of clauses ( 1 ), ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) shall apply in relation to persons who by virtue of this constitution have the ..... to humiliation at social gatherings; questions about the plaintiff being raised as a result amongst members of the sports community. as per the plaint, these amongst other acts, have given rise to the cause of action for filing of the suit.19. before us, mr. tiwari, ld. senior counsel for the appellant does not ..... of publication of the allegedly defamatory statements; the averments in the plaint are wholly based on documents which have been obtained by the plaintiffs under the right to information (rti) act, 2005; and, (iv) that the plaintiffs in the plaint have loosely used the word libel or defamation , without substantiating the same. 9. upon consideration of .....

Vogel Media International Gmbh and anr. Vs. Jasu Shah and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 115(2004)DLT679; 2005(30)PTC51(Del)

..... transfer of the suit bearing no. cs(os) no.883/2001 to the district court was necessitated on account of provisions of section 2 of the delhi high court (amendment) act, 2003 (act no.35 of 2003) which was enforced w.e.f. 16.7.2003 vide a government of india notification of even date and the office order nos. 37/ ..... invoking the provisions of sub-section 5 of section 4 to the aid of the plaintiff held as under:'' sub-section 5 of this provision was inserted by civil procedure code (amendment) act, 1976 for the first time and its insertion was necessitated for the reason that some of the high courts in india were of the view that suit/appeal/ proceeding ..... was transferred to the district court on account of the change in the pecuniary jurisdiction of the high court and the district court consequent upon the delhi high court (amendment) act, 2003 and consequent upon the return of the plaint by the district court in terms of the order dated 30.4.2004 and on its representation before this court .....