Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: apprentices amendment act 2007 section 2 insertion of new section 3b Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 9 results (0.398 seconds)

Smt. Bimla Devi D/O Bakhtawar Singh Vs. Singh Raj S/O Dasondhi Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1977P& H167

..... on the ground of the continued matrimonial fault of the other party after the expiry of the prescribed period.22. in 1964, there was a radical departure. by an amending act, clauses (viii) and (ix) were omitted and instead, sub-section (ia) was introduced into section 13. instead of the non-defaulting party-decree-holder alone being ..... be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together ..... the age of eighteen years. explanation:-- this clause applies whether the marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976.(13a) in any proceeding under this act, on a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce, except in so far as the petition is founded on the grounds .....

Krishna Khetarpal Vs. Satish Lal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1987P& H191

..... divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that ..... ), m. r. sharma, j. granted divorce to the spouses on their joint statement at the appellate stage and the original petition for annulment of marriage was deemed to have been amended to one for divorce.11. in dharamvir v. dr. (mrs.) promila, fao no. 76 of 1978 decided on l8th oct. 1978, m. r. sharma, j. allowed divorce by ..... mutual consent at the appellate stage by a deeming amendment to the original petition from back date.12. in dr. surinder pal kaur v. mohinder partap dass, 1982 marr lj 187, m. r. sharma, j. at the appellate stage entertained .....

Gram Panchayat Village, Bathoi Kalan, Patiala Vs. Jagar Ram and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1991P& H159; (1991)99PLR260

..... was held by the division bench that the retrospective abrogation of jurisdiction of civil courts validly exercised by them from 1961 onwards, by section 4 of the act, haryana amendment act 2 of 1981 fictionally substituting section 13 with effect from may 4, 1961, and thereby giving rctrospectivity from that date clearly amounted to trenching upon the ..... property is situate, may, within a period of two years from the date of coming into force of the punjab village common l-ands (regulation) haryana amendment act, 1974 make an application for setting aside the decree to the assistant collector of the first grade having jurisdiction in the village wherein the land or other immovable ..... as the decrees therein have been passed by the civil courts in favour of the landowners comprising the land, in dispute, prior to the passing of the amending act no. 19 of 1976 whereas civil writ petition no. 1870 of 1986 is allowed and the orders of the joint director, panchayat, exercising the powers of .....

Om Parkash Vs. Uda Ram and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)134PLR56

..... a part thereof to the third party. it would, therefore, be clear that as on the date the plaintiff has no right to claim pre-emption under the act as amended under the amendment act, 1995 as he had claimed his pre-emption right on the basis of co-shareship which has ceased to exist in view of the above said ..... during the pendency of the appeal the right of pre-emption of a co-sharer has been taken away by the amendment introduced by the government of haryana vide haryana amendment act, 1995 to the parent act i.e. punjab pre-emption act, 1913, as applicable to the state of haryana, and, therefore, the plaintiff-appellant has lost is superior right of ..... appeal of the appellant by holding that he has no superior right of pre-emption which has been taken away through the amendment in the punjab pre-emption act, 1913 incorporated by the government of haryana vide amendment act published in the gazette notification dated 17.5.1995.2. the brief facts of the case are that plaintiff om parkash filed .....

Arya Mittar and anr. Vs. Dr. Ashok Kumar Goel

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2010)158PLR75

..... 2001, i.e., prior to coming into force of the amendment act and, therefore, the reasons given by the lower appellate court rejecting the amendment application cannot be sustained and the provisions of order 6 rule 17 cpc existing prior to the amendment act, which permits liberal amendment in the written statement are to be applied. learned counsel for ..... the appellants further argued that the plaintiff-respondent was estopped by his own act and conduct from filing the present suit as he had not come ..... of order 6 rule 17 cpc, which were applicable prior to the amendment act, 2002, are applicable in the present case, yet the lower appellate court was right in law while rejecting the aforesaid application for amendment as it is well settled that amendment in the written statement cannot be allowed to fill up the lacunae in .....

Present: Mr. I.P.S.Kohli Advocate Vs. Sagar Deswal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the conditions precedent to the presentation of the petition set out therein have to be satisfied strictly. further, section 14 of the act prior to amendment of the act by marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976 (for short '1976 act') had put a virendra singh adhikari 2014.06.11 14:36 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court ..... be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able ..... representing the petitioner craves an affirmative answer to the above-cited question and upsetting of the order dated 23.05.2014 on the strength of amarjit kaur vs. bhupinder singh, 2007(1) rcr(civil) 834, sonali and another vs. nil, 2009(5) rcr(civil) 529, anamika shrivastava vs. vivek shrivastava, 2009(5) rcr(civil) 862 and .....

Mamta Rani Vs. Bhupesh Verma

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2009P& H186

..... divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to ..... rehabilitation.10. the present case is also on no different footing. here also, as is apparent from the record, the marriage between the parties was solemnised on 29-7-2007 and as per statements made by both of them, they have been living separately since 11-1-2008 and they have not cohabited thereafter. according to averments in the ..... period of six months for the grant of decree of divorce under section 13-b of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (for short 'the act').2. it has been averred in the petition that marriage between the parties took place on 29-7-2007. their relations, however, ran into rough weather and when finally it appeared that there was no scope .....

Smt. Goman Wanti Vs. Darshan Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)143PLR356

..... the finding are on pure questions of facts. this appeal was admitted without framing any question of law on account of the fact that section 41 of the punjab courts act, 1918 was available, which did not require framing of question of law for admission of appeal. it, in fact, allows admission of appeal even on question of fact. ..... meaning of sub-rule (2) of the rule 9 of order 22 and of section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 deserves to be given weight, and once arrived at would not normally be interfered with by superior jurisdiction.7. the amendment dated 21.9.1992 in order xxii rule 3(2) made by this court would not save the appeal ..... the information that the plaintiff-appellant had expired on 9.10.1991. it is appropriate to mention that this court has amended the rules which came in operation with effect from 4.12.1992 and, therefore, the aforementioned amendment is not applicable to the present case as is admitted by the learned counsel for both the parties. further averment has .....

Udho Ram Vs. Swaran Kanta

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1992P& H39

..... teacher and remained posted out of ludhiana. she alleged that she was due to retire on may 31, 1990. she being a specified landlord as defined under the amended act, she produced a certificate with regard to the date of her retirement. she was residing in village nagar. after retirement she was to live in ludhiana in her ..... contest or that filing of an affidavit without containing such grounds which could be supplemented at a later stage, cannot be accepted. the very purpose of the amendment of the act made for summary eviction of the tenant at the instance of the specified landlord for personal requirement of the landlord would stand frustrated.7. it has been ..... revision against order of ejectment passed by the rent controller, ludhiana dated august 11, 1990 u/s. 13-a of the east punjab urban rent restriction act (as amended) hereinafter referred to as 'the act') while declining leave to the tenant to contest ejectment application.2. house no. b.ix-2 (old)/ b-x. 752 (new) situated at ludhiana .....

Uco Bank, Chandigarh Vs. Sumac Engineering Private Ltd. and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1994P& H26; [1997]89CompCas220(P& H); (1994)106PLR516

..... or such application has been made or is made before or after the order for the winding up of the company, or before or after the commencement of the companies (amendment) act, 1960.(3) to (4) xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx a plain reading of the aforesaid provisions makes it clear that when a winding up order ..... the company the creditor cannot avoid paying the court fee. the position of the liquidator when filling a claim petition is, of course, different. he, as already observed earlier, acts in the discharge of his statutory duty when he filed a claim petition to recover money from the debtor but a creditor's suit to recover money from the company ..... , has submitted that the suit against his clients is not maintainable in this court and that no leave is necessary to be obtained against themunder s. 446 of the act. learned counsel appearing on be half of the official liquidator has also objected to the maintainability of the suit against the company on the ground that the petitioner has not .....