Application - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: application Sorted by: old Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 330 results (0.107 seconds)Fateh Singh Vs. Leela Sagwal and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... as prayed for c m no 14978 c of 2011 for reasons mentioned in the application which is accompanied by affidavit delay of 14 days in filing the appeal is condoned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAabida Begam Vs. Iqbal Ahmed
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
Reported in: 2012CrLJ1517
..... concerned jmfc for recovery of the maintenance amount the respondent filed an application under section 125 3 of cr p c with the pretext ..... therefore the provisions of section 125 of cr p c are not applicable in support of his contention he has placed his reliance on ..... passed in favour of the petitioner with the help of an interlocutory application now a days the law relating to talaq is changed it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Rep. by Central Bureau of Investig Vs. Smt.Y.Srilakshmi Wife of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... documentary evidence already on record and that can be considered this reasoning is not right application of law mere documents will not be sufficient unless the relevancy and the oral evidence ..... of the aggrieved applicants is recorded during investigation therefore the above ground for grant of bail fails 18 so .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlaparthi Chinna Vs. Kota Lakshmi Satyanarayana and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... contended that judicial custody of the accused is a condition precedent for entertaining a bail application by this court under section 439 cr p c under section 439 cr p c .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKm. Shashindra Singh Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... or mechanical or electronics instrumentation engineering and two years experience in power sector the applicant applied for the post and after due screening appeared in the interview for ..... given her educational qualifications but during the course of arguments learned counsel representing the applicant would not dispute that the candidates named above have higher educational qualifications than the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Sunita Arora and Others Vs. Delhi Development Authority Through I ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... conditions subsequently the aforesaid pay scale was granted to the applicants without insistence on fulfillment of the conditionalities in terms of ..... test stenography speed of 100 words per minute but the applicants did not comply with this direction and filed the aforementioned ..... validity of conditions imposed at the time of admitting the applicants to the grade of stenographers in dda in any case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGulzar Singh Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary Ministry of Home ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... stated that a lenient view has already been taken against the applicant by reducing the punishment of dismissal to stoppage of 4 ..... ordered his dismissal from service on the appeal filed by the applicant the appellate authority passed the following orders ldquo and whereas ..... at by the appellate authority the only charge for which the applicant had been charge sheeted was decidedly found to be not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaika Motors Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs Nagpu ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
ashok jindal the appellant are in appeal along with stay application 2 after hearing both sides we find that the issue involved is in a narrow ..... opportunity to the appellant 5 the appeal is allowed by way of remand the stay application is also disposed of in the above manner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVinod Kumar Vs. Dalip Singh and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... learned trial court vide impugned order annexure p 3 partly allowed the plaintiff s application and permitted completion of remaining cross examination of the plaintiff feeling aggrieved defendant ..... his remaining cross examination was deferred on request of counsel for defendants himself consequently application of plaintiff has been rightly allowed partly for completion of his remaining cross .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Deepa Bai and Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... written statement by the defendants is concerned in the absence of written statement unless the applicability of order 8 rule 10 of c p c is attracted and the court acts .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial