Any Purpose - Judgment Search Results
Capital Multi-purpose Co-operative Society Bhopal and ors. Vs. the Sta ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-30-1967
Reported in: AIR1967SC1815; 1968(16)BLJR159; [1967]3SCR329
which would enable the appellants to formulate their objections to the proposed schemes in respect of the four-fold purposes mentioned in s. 68-C. The High Court rejected this contention holding that there was sufficient compliance with the
Priyadarshini Multi Purpose Co-Operative Society Ltd vs State of Keral ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-08-2024
OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.9724 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER: PRIYADARSHINI MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD AGED 68 YEARS PRIYADARSHINI MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 1340, CROWN PLAZA, VALIPARAMBU ROAD,
Priyadarshini Multi Purpose Co-Operative Society Ltd vs State of Keral ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-16-2023
16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 25TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 9119 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: RAJEEV GANDHI MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 1324 ANDIMADAM, AKATHETHARA, PALAKKAD - 678 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT T.P.OOMMEN, AGED 68
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Coimbatore Multi Purpose Service Society Vs. the Taluk Land Board
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
DAY OF JULY 2013 26TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 17828 of 2013 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS: ----------- 1. COIMBATORE MULTI PURPOSE SERVICE SOCIETY BISHOP HOUSE, PB-6, BIG BAZAR STREET COIMBATORE-641001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/TREASURER FR. JEGAN ANTONY.2. FR. ALBERT
for Community Purposes. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
existed prior to Section 4, is inhabited and is being used by the owner for his own residential purposes. b) Any factory or commercial establishment which existed prior to section 4 provided it was functional at the
Secretary, Multi-purpose Co-operative Society Vs. Presiding Officer, L ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-10-1978
Reported in: (1979)ILLJ29Mad
Matched in: Parties Secretary, Multi-purpose Co-operative Society Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.
Ajayan vs Thumboor Multi Purpose Co-Operative Society Ltd
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-27-2024
46 YEARS W/O. AJAYAN, THARAYIL HOUSE, THUMBOOR P O, KOTTANELLUR BY ADV C.K.RADHAKRISHNAN (CHALIL) RESPONDENTS: 1 THUMBOOR MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.R1204 THUMBOOR SCB, KOTTANELLUR P O, THRISSUR, KERALA, PIN - 680662 2 SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,
V.S. Sudheesh vs Mala Multi-Purpose Co-Operative Society Ltd., No. R 1 ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-19-2024
other proceedings in respect of such disputes. Section 69 (2) (d) of the Act provides that, for the purpose of sub-section (1) of Section 69, any dispute arising in connection with: 6 : employment of officers and
Gram Panchayat, Vidul of Vidul Vs. Multi Purpose Co-operative Society ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-09-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ407
ORDER1. This application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Darwha-Pusad, by which the amount of the fine of Rs. 50/- imposed by the petitioner on...
Kalutara Bodhi Trust, Galle Road Vs. Kalutara Multi Purpose Co-operati ...
Court: Sri Lanka Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
an interim injunction, G.S. Gupta (Law of Injunctions, 7th edition 2011, pg. 175) had stated that, " The purpose behind the grant of temporary injunction is to protect the legal rights and to avoid future injury during
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free