Any Liability - Judgment Search Results
Aseva Limited Liability Corporation vs.superficial Health and Spa Priv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 10.2017 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 208/2017 & I.A.No.7157/2017 ASEVA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through Mr.D.N.Ray, Mr.Lokesh Kumar Choudhary and Mr.Dillip Kumar Nayak, Advs. versus SUPERFICIAL HEALTH AND SPA
Foodcrest Limited Liability Partnership vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-14-2024
THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 6894 OF 2024 PETITIONER: FOODCREST LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ALAPPUZHA, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO, JIMMY JOSE, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O TG VARGHESE, THERETH HOUSE, VAIKOM
“that the Liability to Pay the Amount I.E. Vs. Shri M.P.Singh and An ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
the same is taken on record. Para Nos.1 to 3 of the aforesaid affidavit reads thus:- “That the liability to pay the amount i.e.gratuity, leave encashment, etc.to the petitioner, is admitted and the same will be paid
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“that the Liability to Pay the Amount I.E. Vs. Shri M.P.Singh and An ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
the same is taken on record. Para Nos.1 to 3 of the aforesaid affidavit reads thus:- “That the liability to pay the amount i.e.gratuity, leave encashment, etc.to the petitioner, is admitted and the same will be paid
Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd. Vs. Cook
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-14-1930
Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd. v. Cook - 281 U.S. 233 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd.
Employers' Liability Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-06-1908
Employers' Liability Cases - 207 U.S. 463 (1908) U.S. Supreme Court Employers' Liability Cases, 207 U.S. 463 (1908) The Employers'
Second Employers' Liability Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-15-1912
whatsoever the purpose or intent of which shall be to enable any common carrier to exempt itself from any liability created by this act shall to that extent be void: Provided, That in any action brought against any
Arizona Employers' Liability Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-09-1919
and the grounds upon which we sustained those statutes are wholly lacking. The employer is not exempted from any liability formerly imposed; he is given no quid pro quo for his new burdens; the common law rules have … the purpose or intent of which shall be to enable any employer to exempt himself or itself from any liability created by this act shall to that extent be void: Provided that, in any action brought against any
Google LLC (a Limited Liability Co.) vs Dr. Krishna Mohan
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-30-2023
109 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.12.2022 IN WP(C)NO.7642/2020 ---- REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.8: GOOGLE LLC (A LIMITED LIABILITY CO.) 1600, AMPHIETHEATRE, PARKWAY, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA, 94043, USA. BY ADV. C.M.ANDREWS RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENT NOS.1-7:1 DR. KRISHNA
Google LLC (a Limited Liability Co.) vs Dr. Nikhil S Rajan,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-30-2023
109 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.12.2022 IN WP(C)NO.7642/2020 ---- REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.8: GOOGLE LLC (A LIMITED LIABILITY CO.) 1600, AMPHIETHEATRE, PARKWAY, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA, 94043, USA. BY ADV. C.M.ANDREWS RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENT NOS.1-7:1 DR. KRISHNA
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free