Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

“that the Liability to Pay the Amount I.E. Vs. Shri M.P.Singh and Another

“that the Liability to Pay the Amount I.E. vs Shri M.P.Singh and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Mar 19, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1055658

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

“that the Liability to Pay the Amount I.E.

Respondent

Shri M.P.Singh and Another

Excerpt

.....mr.ashok sehgal, advocate, for the petitioner. mr.t.p.s.tung, advocate, for the respondents. *** rakesh kumar garg, j (oral) respondents are present in the court. an affidavit of rupinder singh josh, president managing committee, shaheed kanshi ram, memorial college, bhago majra, tehsil kharar, distt. s.a.s.nagar, has been filed in the court and the same is taken on record. para nos.1 to 3 of the aforesaid affidavit reads thus:- “that the liability to pay the amount i.e.gratuity, leave encashment, etc.to the petitioner, is admitted and the same will be paid by the respondent college within a period of 3 months from today, in 3 equal installments. that the firs.installment of the 1/3rd amount, due to the petitioner, will be paid by the end of april, 2013, the second installment of 1/3rd of the amount due, will be paid to the petitioner by the end of may, 2013 and the third installment of 1/3rd of the amount due to the petitioner , will be paid by the end of june, 2013. in this way, the deponent undertakes to clear the due amount cocp no.3412 of 2012 -2- payable to the petitioner by the end of june, 2013, as mentioned above. that the deponent tenders unconditional apology for not paying the amount to the petitioner in time. the deponent has highest regard for this hon'ble court.” counsel for the petitioner agrees to the averments made in para no.2 of the aforesaid affidavit filed, wherein, it has been stated that respondents shall make the payment in question as per the time schedule given in para no.2 of the affidavit. thus, this court is not inclined to proceed further with this contempt petition. however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file revival application, if the aforesaid undertaking is not honoured. disposed of. march 19, 2013 (rakesh kumar garg) savita judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3412 of 2012.

Date of decision:19.03.2013 Prof.

Surjit Singh Sidhu ....Petitioner Versus Shri M.P.Singh and another ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Ashok Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr.T.P.S.Tung, Advocate, for the respondents.

*** RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) Respondents are present in the Court.

An affidavit of Rupinder Singh Josh, President Managing Committee, Shaheed Kanshi Ram, Memorial College, Bhago Majra, Tehsil Kharar, Distt.

S.A.S.Nagar, has been filed in the Court and the same is taken on record.

Para Nos.1 to 3 of the aforesaid affidavit reads thus:- “That the liability to pay the amount i.e.gratuity, leave encashment, etc.to the petitioner, is admitted and the same will be paid by the respondent college within a period of 3 months from today, in 3 equal installments.

That the fiRs.installment of the 1/3rd amount, due to the petitioner, will be paid by the end of April, 2013, the second installment of 1/3rd of the amount due, will be paid to the petitioner by the end of May, 2013 and the third installment of 1/3rd of the amount due to the petitioner , will be paid by the end of June, 2013.

In this way, the deponent undertakes to clear the due amount COCP No.3412 of 2012 -2- payable to the petitioner by the end of June, 2013, as mentioned above.

That the deponent tenders unconditional apology for not paying the amount to the petitioner in time.

The deponent has highest regard for this Hon'ble Court.”

Counsel for the petitioner agrees to the averments made in para No.2 of the aforesaid affidavit filed, wherein, it has been stated that respondents shall make the payment in question as per the time schedule given in para No.2 of the affidavit.

Thus, this Court is not inclined to proceed further with this contempt petition.

However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file revival application, if the aforesaid undertaking is not honoured.

Disposed of.

March 19, 2013 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial