All Courts - Judgment Search Results
Kerala High Court Non-Graduate Staff Vs. The High Court of Kerala and ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-25-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE25H DAY OF JUNE20154TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31253
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Through Registrar and anr. Vs. Brij ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-23-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC1459; 2003(2)ALT56(SC); [2003(96)FLR900]; JT2003(6)SC122; 2003(1)SCALE590; (2003)2SCC390; [2003]1SCR532; 2003(2)SLJ62(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1887
superannuation was less than 58 years.7. In terms of these directions, the Chief Justices of the respective High Courts were required to set up appropriate Committees of five Hon'ble Judges to look into the service records of
Rajasthan High Court Non-gazetted Ministerial Staff Association Throug ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-07-2010
Prakash Tatia, J.1. The petitioner Rajasthan High Court Non-Gazetted Ministerial Staff Association, Jodhpur has preferred this writ petition to challenge the order dated 8.9.2009 (Annex.7) of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Vs. Punjab and Haryana ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** LPA No.709 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:23. 07.2013 **** Sudesh
Raj. High Court Adv.Clerks Asso.Soci. and Vs. Registrar General, Raj. ...
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
Clerks (Lawyers' Clerks) are as under:-“460. Names of the clerks to be registered with the Presiding Officer of Courts.-- All -5- practicing lawyers who wish their clerks to do the above acts must register them with the
High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. Hon'ble High Court of Judica ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
2007 as the last date for furnishing details required for the registration of advocates practicing in the District Courts and before this Court at Allahabad and Lucknow. The order of the learned Single Judge reads as follows:
Delhi High Court Bar Association and Anr. Vs. Hon'ble Chief Justice Hi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-1993
Reported in: 50(1993)DLT532; 1993(26)DRJ99
Union Territory of Delhi, is under a legal obligation to immediately issue a notification to bifurcate the subordinate courts in Delhi, and further that order transferring to the subordinate courts certain class of suits/ proceedings as on
Shamsundar and Court Vs. Sha Sunnilal Vesaji and Court and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-1961
Reported in: AIR1962Kant12; AIR1962Mys12
their judgment-debtor and these movable were sold and the money realised by the sale was received by the court on March 17, 1959. By the time those assets were received by the court, both these decree-holders had
Court of Wards Dada Siba Estate and anr. Vs. Raja Dharan Dev Chand
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-23-1959
Reported in: AIR1961P& H143
If so, how much? The learned trial Court came to the conclusionthat the suit was cognizable by the Courts in KangraDistrict where the defendant resided and on issuesNos. 4 and 5 it was held that the contract
Shamsher Singh, Superintendent (Retd.), Punjab and Haryana High Court ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-17-2009
Reported in: (2010)157PLR528
K. Kannan, J.1. The petitioner, who was working as a Superintendent Grade-1 on the establishment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, was retired prematurely on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 05.10.2003. On a plea
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free