Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 section 155 limitation of powers of confirming authority Page 5 of about 837 results (0.127 seconds)

Sep 24 2003 (HC)

Bulu Das and anr. Vs. Moni Das and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... into account such a female person, who had married the male hindu person, during the subsistence of the latter's valid marriage before coming into force of the act of 1956. but after coming into force of the act, 1956, second marriage being void, the question of treating such a woman as a widow does not arise at all. hence, the marriage between the ..... said deceased and the respondent no. 1, being after coming into force of the act of 1955 and during the subsistence of the former's valid marriage with the appellant no. 1, cannot be treated valid nor can the respondent no. 1 be treated ..... deceased. i am also guided to adopt this view from the law laid down by the apex court in the case of rameshwari devi v. state of bihar, reported in air 2000 sc 735, wherein the apex court has held thus :'it cannot be disputed that the marriage between narain lal and yogmaya devi was in contravention of clause (i) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2009 (HC)

islamuddIn Vs. Sri Umesh Chandrara Tiwari and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3680

..... conclusion is, therefore, irresistible that in a case where an application for special leave to appeal from an order of acquittal is filed after the coming into force of the limitation act, 1963, section 5 would be available to the applicant.the above observations are self explanatory.69. in vijay gupta (supra) the objection filed before the competent ..... respect to judicial commissioner. this was pointed out by nagpur judicial commissioner's court in the case of mst. hira bai v. mangal chand air 1935 nag. 46. it was a short act containing only three sections.21. after independence in the constitution specific provisions were made with respect to powers of contempt of supreme court and ..... contempt. the calcutta high court in king emperor v. girindra mohan das and ors. 17 c.w.n. 1285; and legal remembrancer v. matilal ghose and ors. air 1914 cal. 69 took a contrary view. further it was also not clear as to whether the court of judicial commissioners of the central provinces, oudh and sind have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1957 (HC)

Raj Rajendra Sardar Maloji Narsing Rao Vs. Shankar Saran and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1958All775

..... allahabad, sub-article (3) of article 261 of the constitution had come into force. important changes had also been effected by the indian independence act, adaptation of central acts and ordinances order of 1947, adaptation of laws order 1950, adaptation of laws (amendment) order 1950, and the civil procedure code amendment act (ii of 1951). the decree could, therefore, be executed at allahabad in ..... learned judges expressly dissented from the bombay view. the mysore view commended itself to a division bench of rajasthan high court in the case of premchand v. danmal, air 1954 raj 4 (z14-15). the decision in this case being contrary to the earlier decision in the case of , a full bench of five judges was ..... third case of the bombay high court the question arose only in an indirect manner. that case is the case of vasant atma ram v. dattoba raja ram. air 1956 rom 49 (z2). in that case in a suit fought in the belgaum court between the parties it had been held that the plaintiff had been validly .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2007 (HC)

Vishnu Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2417

..... mandatory provisions of the section, holds substance.8. section 20 of the railway protection force act, 1987 reads as follows:20. protection of acts of members of the force. - (1) in any suit or proceeding against any [***] member of the force for any act done by him in the discharge of his duties, it shall be lawful for him ..... the aforesaid facts, the petitioner nos. 3, 4 and 5 being the members of the railway protection security force and public servants, they are protected under the provisions of the railway protection force act for their acts done in discharge of their official duties and they cannot be prosecuted for any offence without adopting the mandatory procedures ..... duties and since the petitioner nos. 3, 4 and 5 belong to the railway protection force, they are entitled to the benefit of the protection under the provisions of the railway protection force act in respect of any of their acts and deeds, done in discharge of their official duties and, therefore, they cannot be made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 1985 (SC)

Management of Goodyear India Limited Vs. K.G. Devessar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1985SC1758; [1985(51)FLR550]; (1986)ILLJ25SC; (1985)4SCC45; 1986(1)LC256(SC)

..... in section 2(e) is to hold that a person whose services are terminated for any of the reasons mentioned in section 4(1), after the coming into force of the act is entitled to the payment of gratuity, if he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years, for that period during which he satisfied the ..... gratuity, the termination of employment whether it be due to superannuation or retirement or resignation or death or disablement, has to be after the date of coming into force of the act. once that condition is satisfied, the further question would be regarding the amount of gratuity payable. gratuity will have to be paid to all those persons whose employment ..... figure rs 1600 but during the relevant period, it was rs 1000 only. the submission on behalf of the management was that both on the date when the act came into force and on the date when the respondent retired from the service, he was drawing wages exceeding rs 1000 and therefore, he was not entitled to payment of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1997 (HC)

N.K. Dalip Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998IIAD(Delhi)474; 71(1998)DLT40

..... on 27.2.1987. (3) the earlier order of dismissal from service was now changed to that of removal from service under section 11(1) of the central reserve police force act read with rule 27 of the crpf rules, 1955 and making it clear that punishment will not render the petitioner unsuitable for further service in any other department. (4) ..... were as follows : 'article-iv while functioning in f/60crpf the aforesaid naik dalip singh was guilty of misconduct in his capacity as a member of the force u/section 11(1) of crpf act, 1949 in that he leveled several allegations against his coy. commander shri herjinder singh, deputy sp. vide his aforesaid letter. article-v that the said naik ..... article-vi that during december, 81 while functioning as naik the said nk dalip singh was guilty of misconduct in his capacity as a member of the force u/section 11(1) of crpf act, 1949 in that he remained absent without leave or permission from competent authority for the period from 4.12.81 to 9.12.81 (an) and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 1997 (HC)

R. Unnikrishnan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1997(2)WLC464; 1997(1)WLN201

..... law that would be given to him.7. the provisions of section 48 of the border security force act in regard to the inflicting of punishments on b.s.f. personnel are para materia to section 71 of the army act, 1950, under which provisions the army officers were tried and punished in the cases which had come up ..... awarded any such punishment for forfeiture of service for the purpose of pension or any other prescribed purpose in terms of. section 48(g) of the border security force act.4. the facts as stated by the petitioner are not denied in the reply filed on behalf of the respondents. however, it is denied by the respondents that ..... and other benefits to which the petitioner would have been entitled to.5. section 48 of the border security force act enumerates the punishments to be inflicted in respect of the offences committed by the persons subject to the border security force act i.e.death, imprisonment, dismissal from service, forfeiture of service for the purpose of increased pay, pension .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1980 (HC)

United India Roller Flour Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT66(Mad)

..... have the force of law under the provisions of this act;(a) when it comes into operation as an enactment, with or without amendment, or (b) when the central government in pursuance of a motion passed by parliament ..... maida, the petitioners would be entitled to a refund of the duty already paid by them. section 4 of the provisional collection of taxes act reads as follows :-(1) a declared provision shall have the force of law immediately on the expiry of the day on which the bill containing it is introduced;(2) a declared provision shall cease to ..... under item 1-f of the central excise tariff in the finance bill. consequently, the declaration made under section 3 of the act ceased to have the force of law by the operation of section 2(a) of the act. further, sec 5(1) clearly states that where a declared provision comes into operation as an enactment in an amended form .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1995 (HC)

Abid Ali Khan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995(33)DRJ77; 1995LabIC371

..... for which he was tried by a petty security force court, found guilty and sentenced. three charges were under section 40 of the border security force act (for short the act) : ' an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force' and the 4th charge under section 46 of the act 'for having committed a civil offence being a ..... singh, alias sindhu of village daoke, p.s. gharinda, distt. amritsar, to cross-over the international border. third charge ; an act prejudicial to good order discipline of the force in that he, at bop daoke, on 31 may, 1990, at about 2130 hrs. improperly and without authority permitted shri salwinder singh alias ..... permitted shri salwinder singh alias sindhu of village daoke, p.s. gharinda, distt. amritsar, to cross over the international border. second charge; an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force - in that he, at bop daoke, on 24/25 may, 1990, at about 2130 hrs. improperly and without authority permitted shri salwinder .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2007 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Amar Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ62[SC]; 2007(3)SCALE454; 2007AIRSCW7628; ; 2008(1)KCCRSN24

..... single judge of the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh holding that the services of the respondent-herein are governed by the central reserve police force act, 1949 (in short 'the act') and rule 24 of the central civil services (pension) rules, 1972 does not govern the service conditions is without jurisdiction. 3. the factual position ..... india in the ministry of finance memorandum no. f.3(1)e(spl)/47, dated the 17th april, 1950 as may be amended from time to time.(b) pensions and gratuities to enrolled followers for service in the force shall be governed by provisions contained in the central (class iv) services (gratuity, pension and retirement) rule, ..... in the ministry of finance memorandum no.f3(1)e(spl)/47, dated the 17th april, 1950, as may be amended from time to time.the above referred provision makes it clear that even for the personnel/force in central reserve police force, civil service regulations or pension rules are applicable. in fact, except rule 42 clarifying that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //