Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 section 155 limitation of powers of confirming authority Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 24 results (0.252 seconds)

A. Srinivasa Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD134; 2003(2)ALT347

ordere. dharma rao, j.1. against the proposed action of the respondents to corporatize the special protection force constituted under the andhra pradesh special protection force act, 1991 (act 25 of 1991), this writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of mandamus declaring that the first respondent has no legal and ..... in the backdrop of the these facts, sri rama mohan rao, n., the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that immediately after the creation of the force as per act 25 of 1991, the first respondent through his letter no. 28240/ po.d91-4 dated 7-3-1992 requested the secretary, ministry of home affairs, government ..... rights enumerated for search, under the code of criminal procedure, shall also apply to the members of the force. thus under the act, when the members of the force enjoy such powers and functions, corporatizing the entity created under act 25 of 1991 amounts to its abrogation and it is wholly unconstitutional. 12. he further contended that without .....

Juthge Chandra Prasad Vs. State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : II(1999)DMC554

..... a metropolitan magistrate and he had been exercising the powers of a metropolitan magistrate on or before 1.4.1974 when the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (act ii of 1974) had come into force.12. in the case of gandhi pudapunaidu and ors. v. state of a.p. and anr., 1961 (1) crl. lj 461, sri d. subba rao, the then ..... powers of a metropolitan magistrate under the said code or under any other law for the time being in force.notification no. iiiin exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of section 17 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act ii of 1974), the high court of andhra pradesh hereby appoints with effect from 1.4.1974 the ..... powers of a metropolitan magistrate under the said code and under any other law for the time being in force.notification no. iiin exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 16 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act ii of 1974), the high court of andhra pradesh hereby appoints with effect from 1.4.1974 the .....

Juthge Chandra Prasad Vs. the State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(1)ALT(Cri)25; 1999CriLJ32

..... a metropolitan magistrate and he had been exercising the powers of a metropolitan magistrate on or before 1-4-1974 when the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (act 11 of 1974) had come into force.12. in the case of gandi pudapunaidu v. state of a.p. 1961 (1) cri lj 461 sri d. subba rao, the then additional sessions judge- ..... powers of a metropolitan magistrate under the said code or under any other law for the time being in force.notification no. iiiin exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of section 17 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act ii of 1974), the high court of andhra pradesh hereby appoints with effect from 1-4-1974 the ..... of a metropolitan magistrate under the said code and under any other law for the time being in force.notification no. iiin exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 16 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act ii of 1974) the high court of andhra pradesh hereby appoints with effect from 1-4-1974 the .....

Chaliki Seethayamma Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and Spl. Tahsildar (L ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(3)ALT105

..... can be rectified under section 152 c.p.c. in the instant case, though the petitioner is entitled for enhanced rate of interest and solatium under the amended act, which was in force by then, the learned subordinate judge granted interest and solatium as per the old law. it is purely an accidental slip or omission on the part of the ..... c. is not maintainable. 7. the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner are well founded. it is not disputed that the amended act 68 of 1984 was already in force by the date of passing of the award in this case. therefore, the learned sub-judge while passing the award should award the statutory benefits like ..... court.'5. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of passing the award in o.p. no. 93 of 1981 the amended act 68 of 1984 had come into force, therefore the learned subordinate judge while passing the award on 20-11-1984 ought to have granted the statutory benefits under the provisions of the amended .....

Akinipalli Shankaraiah Vs. Akinipalli Lingaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD94; 2002(3)ALT308

..... 1993 is rejected. no costs.' 12. from the above it can be seen that the disputed transaction was of the year 1978 i.e., long prior to coming into force of the act and the suit is also of the year 1984 though the learned judge did not record a clear finding whether the defence of benami transaction was taken by the ..... deed dated 11.1.1978 and jala rama murlhy executed estoppel kharamama dated 16.1.1978. both these transactions took place quite anterior to the date on which the act came into force. if that is so as held by the apex court in the aforementioned two decisions - r. rajagopal reddy v. p. chandrasekharan and nand kishore v. sushita the prohibition contained ..... revision was preferred to this court. from the reported judgment, it appears, it was a suit filed in the year 1984 i.e., long prior to coming into force of section 4 of the act. 11. while allowing the revision the learned judge has held as follows insofar as the issue involved in the case on hand. 'i do not find any .....

G. Yadagiri Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represent ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(3)ALT69

..... -section which requires that before issuing any such notification the government shall publish in the a.p. gazette a notice of their intention to bring into force the act in any municipality or municipal corporation in the state, and fix a period which shall not be less than two months from the date of publication ..... counsel for the 5th respondent adopts the contention of the learned standing counsel that the ordinance was never brought into force and therefore the repeal in section 67 never took effect and the act remained in force and as such the proceedings cannot be challenged as being without authority of law. having regard to the notification under ..... the learned standing counsel for the corporation, submits that though the ordinance was promulgated, it was never brought into force, so the repealing provision in section 67 has not taken effect; consequently the act remained in force.18. it would be appropriate to read here section 1 of the ordinance which is in the following terms'.'(1 .....

State Bank OfIndia, Suryapet Branch,nal Vs. 1.The Deputycommercial Tax ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... irrespective of the fact that section 33-c was inserted w.e.f.19.01.1976, since section 33-c operated in respect of all charges that were then in force and gave sales tax dues precedence over them. in state bank of bikaner & jaipur v. national iron & steel rolling corporation3 also the apex court considered a similar provision ..... any, payable by a dealer or any other person under this act, shall be the firs.charge on the property of dealer, or such person. a plain reading of the ..... providing for an absolute precedence to the arrears of tax under the apgst act. for ready reference, section 16-c may be reproduced hereunder: 16-c. liability under this act to be the firs.charge:- notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law for the time being in force, any amount of tax, penalty, interest and any other sum, if .....

Nallajerla Murali Krishna @ Mura Vs. the State of Telangana, Through P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... 320 cr.p.c. in fact, after the state amendments (supra), there is the central legislation (referred supra) covered by criminal law (amendment) act 2013 (act 13 of 2013), which came into force with effect from 03.02.2013, with punishment not less than one year but which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to pay ..... fact the severe punishment is provided in the state legislation that is applicable for the offences committed prior to the central legislation covered by the amended act of 2013, which came into force with effect from 03.02.2013. however, the expressions of the apex court say article 20 of the constitution of india is a protection to ..... justice b. siva sankara rao criminal petition no.9567 of 2014 order : this matter involves to decide whether section 354 ipc (after criminal law amendment act, 13 of 2013 which came into force) with effect from 03.02.2013 with consequential amendment in the schedule-i cr.p.c. is still a non-compoundable offence and triable by court .....

immidisetti Ramakrishnaiah Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1962]13STC914(AP)

..... , had, therefore, not become final by 18th march, 1957, and that state of affairs continued till 18th february, 1959, when the andhra pradesh general sales tax act came into force on 15th june, 1957, providing for a period of four years. it would be seen that the assessment proceedings were stayed for a period of one year and eleven ..... court, the assessment could have been made within time even according to the previous law; in such cases, the period during which the order of stay was in force should be excluded in computing the period of limitation. the observations of the learned chief justice of the madras high court in kandaswami pillai v. kannappa chetty (1951) ..... earlier decisions of the madras high court in muhamad hussain nachiar v. commissioner of income-tax, madras (1956) 2 m.l.j. 139 and ramanathan chettiar v. kandappa gounden (1950) 2 m.l.j. 624.19. a bench of this court followed that decision (syed mohammed ravoother v. deputy commercial tax officer, tirukoilur [1958] 9 s.t.c. .....

Jalumuru Krushnam Raju Vs. Commissioner of Tribal Welfare Dept., A.P., ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD389; 2001(6)ALT152

..... community certificate passed in october 1994 and served on the petitioner on 6-4-2001 suffers from infirmity.10. it is not denied that before coming into force of the act and the rules the subject of issue and cancellation of community certificates for sc, st and bcs was governed by various executive instructions issued by the ..... 1993 directed the commissioner to conduct enquiry into the validity of the community certificate produced by the petitioner. therefore, insofar as conduct of enquiry before coming into force of the act on 16-5-1997, it cannot be held to be without jurisdiction. however, the difficulty arises in this case is as to whether an order which ..... not competent to cancel the community certificates. the order communicated on 6-4-2001 must be held to have been passed and communicated only after coming into force of the act and therefore the same is illegal as the same without jurisdiction.15. the order which is not communicated to the aggrieved party or to the person .....