Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 section 155 limitation of powers of confirming authority Page 2 of about 837 results (0.166 seconds)

Mar 22 2010 (HC)

Mrs. Savita Bhanot Vs. Lt. Col. V.D. Bhanot

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2010)158PLR1

..... return of the deposits or interest on the deposit. the petitioners before the high court were prosecuted for committing default in return of deposits taken prior to coming into force of the act. the prosecution was challenged on the ground that a penal law cannot be given retrospective effect and, therefore, the tamil nadu protection of interest of depositors in ..... the view that since the cause of action arose prior to coming into force the act the court need not adjudicate upon the merits of her case.3. the only question which comes up for determination by this court is as to whether a petition ..... order dated 18.9.2009. the learned additional sessions judge was of the view that since the petitioner had left the matrimonial home on 4.7.2005 and the act came into force on 26.10.2006, the claim of a woman living in domestic relationship or living together prior to 26.10.2006, was not maintainable. he was of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 1953 (HC)

Ajit Kumar Roy Vs. Surendra Nath Ghose

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1953Cal733,57CWN627

..... west bengal premises rent control (temporary provisions) act, 1950 came into force on 31-3-1950 and it repealed the act of 1948. the act of 1950 as it originally stood did not affect the suit. it was however amended on 30-11-1950 by act 62 of 1950. section 18 (5) of the act of 1950 as amended by the latter act, provides as follows:'in all applications made ..... by my lord the chief justice.das gupta, j.26. after the amendment by the amending act--act 62 of 1950--section 18(5) ofthe west bengal premises rent control (temporary provisions) act, 1950, runs in these words:'if at the date when this act comes into force, a suit for ejectment of a tenant is pending whether in trial court or in court ..... proviso, gives.23. this conclusion is in no way opposed to an observation made in the pull bench case of --'t.s.r. sarma v. nagendra bala debi', air 1953 cal 879 (p), where the majority judgment was delivered by myself. with reference to section 14(4), it was then stated that section 18(5) had not the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2014 (HC)

Tarabai W/O Mudgal Rao Kulkarni Vs. Venkatesh S/O Kishan Rao

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

..... holder was succeeded on his death by persons who were then his nearest heirs and the property vested in them could not be divested by the hindu succession act coming into force subsequently though this fact was not adverted to in the judgment. this court had therefore also no occasion to consider the effect of the earlier decisions on ..... singh and another vs. dile ram supra that in a decision where a hindu widow having a life interest, made a gift of the properties before coming into force of the act, such gift would be unaffected is not a preposition which is in dispute. in that decision, the further circumstance was; there being a compromise decree that the ..... hereinabove, the question whether the plaintiff can claim as reversioner of the suit properties by virtue of bhimbai having parted with possession prior to the coming into force of the hs act, would have to be answered in the negative in the light of the law as laid down by the supreme court hereinabove. consequently, the judgment 37 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 1996 (HC)

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ravichandran and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : I(1997)ACC330; 1998ACJ18; ILR1997KAR148

..... situation if one were to hold that merely because the insurance policy was issued prior to the date on which the act came into force, that it would be governed by the old law. section 157 of the new act has only engrafted a procedural change and to my mind therefore one would have to rationally construe it by holding that ..... present one where the policy in question was issued prior to the new act coming into force but was alive on the date when the new act came into force, and secondly in situations where the transfer has taken place on a date prior to the new act coming into force but where the incident resulting in the injuries has taken place after the ..... new act has come into force. one possible contention is that after 1.7.1989, once the new act has come into force, all incidents or accidents as they may be termed would be covered .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2010 (HC)

Dr.Zakir HussaIn Primary Teachers Education College, and ors. Dr.Zakir ...

Court : Patna

..... has to be held that the bar is in respect of courses or training conducted by an earlier recognized institution for the sessions beginning after the coming into force of the act. this provision need not to be read as retrospective or retroactive as it would cause undue hardship and injustice to the students of institutions having recognition prior to ..... the board has been filed.12. on merits the main issue is whether the college had been granted recognition/approval by the state government prior to coming into force of ncte act on 17.08.1995 or not. on behalf of the appellants reliance has been placed upon annexure-2 and annexure-3 to show that vide annexure-2 ..... upon several constitution bench judgment of the supreme court starting from 1. air 1952 sc 181 (dattatraya moreshwar v. the state of bombay & ors), 2. air 1952 sc 317 (state of bombay v. purushottam jog, 3. air 1955 sc 160 (p. joseph john v. state of travancore-cochin, and 4. air 1964 sc 1823 (chitralekha v. state of mysore).14. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1935 (PC)

Mrinalini Debi Vs. Harlal Roy

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1936Cal339

..... which i have indicated. the result is that there is nothing left in the section to suggest that it is to apply to suits instituted before the act comes into force. that being the case the ordinary rule of interpretation ought to apply and in the absence of any indication that the legislature intended it to be ..... appeal was preferred an interesting position was created, because during the pendency of the appeal before the matter reached this court, there came into force a local act known as the bengal money-lenders act of 1933, which was ordered to become operative on 1st july 1934, and it was then that the defendants realised that they had ..... was the intention of the legislature. the section really deals with two distinct matters; firstly, suits which are instituted before the act comes into force and secondly money which was lent before the act comes into force. such being the-case the legislature might deal with the matter in three ways. the section might have no retrospective effect at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2010 (HC)

Dr.Zakir HussaIn Primary Teach. Vs. State of Bihar, and ors.

Court : Patna

..... has to be held that the bar is in respect of courses or training conducted by an earlier recognized institution for the sessions beginning after the coming into force of the act. this provision need not to be read as retrospective or retroactive as it would cause undue hardship and injustice to the students of institutions having recognition prior to ..... the board has been filed.12. on merits the main issue is whether the college had been granted recognition/approval by the state government prior to coming into force of ncte act on 17.08.1995 or not. on behalf of the appellants reliance has been placed upon annexure-2 and annexure-3 to show that vide annexure-2 ..... upon several constitution bench judgment of the supreme court starting from 1. air 1952 sc 181 (dattatraya moreshwar v. the state of bombay & ors), 2. air 1952 sc 317 (state of bombay v. purushottam jog, 3. air 1955 sc 160 (p. joseph john v. state of travancore-cochin, and 4. air 1964 sc 1823 (chitralekha v. state of mysore).14. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 1991 (HC)

Dayashankar Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR665; (1992)94BOMLR30

..... in 1974, indian law reporters, 870 at page 873. this judgment has upheld the provisions of section 9 and rule 21 of the railway protection force act, 1957 and railway protection force rules, 1959. the court has observed in the course of its judgment that initially the first contention which has been raised before it was in connection ..... reported in 1982 lab & ind 89, the allahabad high court was required to consider a case where the plaintiffs were appointed as rakshaks under the railway protection force act, 1957 by an assistant security officer. the court said that it would be immaterial for the application of article 311 of the constitution whether the power to appoint ..... submitted that the appointment of the petitioners is therefore bad in law because it is not in accordance with the provisions of section 6 of the railway protection force act 1957. he further submitted that if this is so, the petitioners are not entitled to the protection of article 311 of the constitution. 10. mr. lokur .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1918 (PC)

In Re: Kandasami Pillai and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1918Mad418(2); (1918)35MLJ736

..... by any court constituted under this code by which such offence is shown in the 8th column, 2nd schedule to be triable. sections 3 to 11 of the special act not being in force in this presidency, there is no court mentioned in this behalf. the second schedule provides nuder the heading ' offences against other laws' for the trial of an ..... addition to the section which would have the effect of negativing the purpose of the section which is simply to provide power to make the rules although the act has not come into force, but to reserve their application. in addition to this there is direct authority of the house of lords against the contention. it is to be found in ..... at all events ...is to be read into the section, and have just the same effect as if it had been contained in the act itself; ' for these reasons we are satisfied that the rules came into force directly they were published in the gazette and therefore that the offence is created.4. the argument that such offence can only be tried .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1918 (PC)

In Re: Kandasamy Pillai and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 46Ind.Cas.161

..... any court constituted under this code by which such offence is shown in the 8th column, second schedule, to be triable. sections 3 to 11 of the special act not being in force in this presidency, there is no court mentioned in this behalf. the second schedule provides under the heading 'offences against other laws' for the trial of an offence ..... to the section which would have the effect of negativing the purpose of the section, which is simply to provide power to make -the rules although the act has not come into force, but to reserve their application in addition to this there is direct authority of the house of lords against the contention. it is to be found in ..... at all events...is to be read into the section, and have just the same effect as if it had been contained in the act itself.' for these reasons we are satisfied that the rules came into force' directly they were published in the gazette and, therefore, that the offence is created.4. the argument that such offence can only be .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //