Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 section 155 limitation of powers of confirming authority Page 4 of about 837 results (1.401 seconds)

Aug 14 1964 (HC)

Mehramansinhji Alias Mahammmed Masood JalulluddIn Thakore Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1965)6GLR655

..... exact connotation of this expression on which we have been addressed at length. section 3 provides that with effect from the date on which the act comes into force e.g. 15 august 1950 the taluqdari tenure shall be deemed to have been abolished and all the incidents of the said tenure attaching to any land comprised in a ..... and panchmahals as constituted immediately before the 1st day of august 1949. under a notification of the state government issued under section 1 clause (3) the act has come into force on 15th august 1950. section 2 clause (1) defines code as meaning the bombay land revenue code 1879 and section 2 clause (2) defines taluqdars ..... legislation to abolish mewasi tenure viz. the panch mahals mewasi tenure abolition act. 1949 which would have been wholly unnecessary on this wider interpretation. the act under our consideration and this act were assented to on the same day viz. 21-1-1950. there would have been some force in this argument but for the fact that the mewasi tenure in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2005 (HC)

Hemant Sudhakar Madane and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR841; 2006(2)BomCR307

..... appointment, notification, notice, tax, order, scheme, licence, permission, rule, bylaw or form made, issued, imposed or granted under the maharashtra municipalities act, 1965 or any other law in force in any local area constituted to be a city immediately before the appointed day shall, in so far as it is not inconsistent with the provisions ..... and whether the notifications issued by the state government fixing prices of scrap iron were in force even after applicability of the provisions of indian scrap control order, 1943, to the state and particularly, after 12th september, 1950, the day on which the said indian scrap control order was made applicable to the state ..... , and after considering the provisions of section 24 of the general clauses act, quoted the following passage from craise on statute law, 6th edition, page .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1985 (HC)

Mineral Miner's Union Vs. Kudremukh Iron Ore Co. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR915]; ILR1985KAR2833; (1986)ILLJ204Kant

..... the workmen of a public utility service under s. 22, reaches the conciliation officer, the conciliation proceedings stand automatically commenced. further by the force of s. 22(1)(d) of the act, the workmen who have given such notice are prohibited from going on strike not during the pendency of conciliation proceedings, but also during seven ..... kudermukh iron ore company ltd., (the company for short), the following questions of law arise for consideration. (i) whether s. 22(1) of the industrial disputes act ('the act' for short) requires the workmen employed in a public utility service to issue a fresh notice of strike, though they had issued earlier, a notice of strike ..... rules regulating or restricting the deduction permitted under the proviso to s. 9, the respondent was entitled to deduct 8 days' wages as more than ten workmen acting in concert absented themselves. in any event, as regards the deduction of salary for 8 days, the petitioner had an alternative remedy by way of raising an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1999 (SC)

Smt. Naresh Kumari (Dead) by Lrs. and anr. Vs. Sh. Shakshi Lal (Dead) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC928; JT1999(1)SC285; (1999)3MLJ1(SC); 1999(1)SCALE285; (1999)2SCC656; [1999]1SCR438; 1999(1)LC319(SC)

..... against the reversioners interest. aggrieved by this, smt. nirmal kumari appealed before the first appellate court. during its pendency, on 17th june, 1956 the aforesaid hindu succession act came into force and on 22nd may, 1957 smt. kesri died. finally, on 11th june, 1958, the appeal was also dismissed. after conclusion of the first leg of litigation, ..... defendants, the appellants before us, have contested the suit on the ground that on the date smt. kesri died, namely, 22nd may 1957, since hindu succession act came into force, smt. kesri became full owner of the said property and hence she being transferee from her and being in possession of this property became full owner. for ..... right in the property, if transfer by smt. kesri would have have been after she had become full owner under section 14(1), after coming into force of that act. it is only in cases of valid transfers the question of examining whether such deed or document of transfer confers the transferee a restrictive right or not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2015 (HC)

Ajit Kumar Barnwal and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... this connection, reference may be made to the case of vishnu kumar vs. state of bihar (now jharkhand) (supra) wherein while considering section 20 of the railway protection force act, 1957 and section 197 of cr.p.c., it was held as follows:- "9. as stated above, petitioners nos. 3 to 6, being the members of the railway ..... a vindictive attitude had lodged the present case. he has submitted while referring to section 20 of the railways protection force act, 1957 that the members of the railways protection force are protected from any suit or proceeding for an act done in the discharge of his duty. in this context he has referred to a judgment in the case of ..... petition that the only grievance against them as made by the complainant is that on being informed by the complainant regarding the acts of high-handedness and violence indulged by the members of the railway protection force and other officers, the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 did not offer any help nor took any action on the complaint .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 1936 (PC)

Baryar Singh Vs. Ram Dularay

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1937All96

..... to give them relief both during the suit and also after the decree, and legislation of this nature should be construed liberally to give the intention of the act as much force as possible. for these reasons, i consider that the application of the judgment-debtor is one which should be granted under section 30, sub-section (2) ..... that the legislature intended to grant relief to agricultural tenants, and there is no reason why it should refuse relief to persons whose decrees were passed after the act came into force. if this had been the intention of the legislature it would have been natural that the legislature should have statedin sub-section (2) : 'if a decree ..... (1), the amount decreed on account of interest.2. the court below interprets the words 'has already been passed' as meaning a decree passed before the act came into force. it appears to me that this interpretation of the sub-section is not correct. according to the laws of grammar and interpretation 'has already been passed' should .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1961 (HC)

B.P. Krishnamurthy Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1965CriLJ568; (1964)1MysLJ340; [1962]13STC436(Kar)

..... mentioned in column (2) of the second schedule is the first or the earliest of the successive dealers in the state after the mysore sales tax act, 1957, came into force. before that act came into force, sales of those goods were exempt from the payment of sales tax and there could have been no dealer during that period who was liable to ..... 1957. the fact that there were other dealers who dealt in those goods before that date and the fact that the first and earliest of the dealers after the act came into force had purchased before 1st october, 1957, the goods from any one of those dealers, are quite immaterial considerations. the incidence of liability is on the first or the ..... beer were exempt from the payment of sales tax. 11. it is contended by mr. srinivasan that, on 1st october, 1957, when the new mysore sales tax act came into force, the petitioner was not the first or the earliest of the successive dealers in the state, since by then, he had already purchased the goods sold by him from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1989 (SC)

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

..... by sending any reply. he was therefore, dismissed from service by the commandant by order dated january 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of border security force act, 1968 and the rules framed thereunder.6. the munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the commandant dismissed him from service. the suit was, ..... contained in chapters vii to xi of the rules framed under section 141 of the border security force act. the border security force act has been enacted with a view to provide for the constitution and regulation of an armed force of the union for ensuring the security of the borders of india and for matters connected therewith, ..... in accordance with the powers conferred on the commandant, bsf under the provisions of section 11(2) and (4) of border security force act, 1968 read with rule 177 of border security force rules, 1969. it was also held that this was an independent power conferred upon the commandant apart from the power conferred upon the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1962 (SC)

Baljeet Singh and ors. Vs. Risal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1962]Supp3SCR217

..... , 12-a, 12-b, 12-c and 12-d have been substituted by new section which apply to proceedings taken in consolidation operations subsequent to the coming into force of the amending act xxxviii of 1858. sub-s. (1) of s. 12 makes it clear that the matters mentioned in that sub-section cannot be raised subsequent to the date of ..... the various amending acts are : act xxvi of 1954 which came into force on december 13, 1954; act xiii of 1955 which came into force on june 10, 1955; act xx of 1955 which came into force on october 21, 1955; act xxiv of 1956 which came into force on july 3, 1956; act xvi of 1957 which came into force on may 25, 1957 and act xxxviii of 1958 which ..... s. (1) final and conclusive. we are not concerned with its effect in these appeals. 19. section 49 of the act bars the jurisdiction of civil courts. this section, before its amendment by act xiii of 1955, which came into force on june 10, 1955, did not bar the institution of a suit or proceedings in the revenue court. it did so .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1959 (HC)

Sufi Mohd. Akbar and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1960CriLJ223

..... that they are aggrieved by that order. they say that by virtue of sub-section (3) of section 31 of the jammu and kashmir constitution act 1996, act xlii of 1956 came into force on the date it was published in the gazette after having received the assent of tile sadar-i-riyasat. the proceedings taken by the committing ..... under:-a bill which is assented to under the last preceding sub-section shall be published in the gazette in urdu and english and shall become an act and have the force of law as soon as it is published in ether of the aforesaid languages.the case of the petitioners is based entirely on the interpretation of ..... and kashmir security rules and the said rule 32. some of the accused persons raised a contention before the committing magistrate that the criminal procedure code amendment act), 1956, (act no. xlii of 1956) was in force in the state and that the inquiry should, therefore, be held in accordance with. its provisions.the committing magistrate by his order dated 7 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //