Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 section 155 limitation of powers of confirming authority Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 11 results (0.117 seconds)

Sunder Singh Vs. Faqir Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1948P& H47

..... not necessary to recapitulate them here.2. the only question in this second appeal is whether section 10, punjab urban rent restriction act 10 [x] of 1941, was in force in jullundur cantonment.3. the act received the assent of his excellency the governor-general on 15-5-1941 and was published in the punjab gazette on 23-5- ..... -c-41/34914 saying that in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1. of the act the governor of the punjab was pleased to direct that the act should come into force in the areas specified in the schedule annexed to the notification and with effect from the date of the notification. jullundur cantonment ..... according to sub-section (3) of section 1 the provincial government has been expressly empowered to bring the act into force in any urban area, it is futile to urge that when the government issues a notification bringing the act into force in a cantonment, even those provisions of it which cannot possibly have any effect upon the regulation of .....

ita No.257 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. M/S R.J.Traders, Amritsar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... in accordance with law as and when and if any advers.order is passed against the assessee, under the 1961 act. in view of what has been stated hereinabove, the impugned orders are affirmed. the order passed by the itat is modified in the aforementioned terms.the appeals are ..... of evasion of tax etc.we, therefore, restore the matter to the assessing officer to proceed afresh and in accordance with law after considering orders passed under the 1961 act and if permissible, frame a fresh assessment against the assessee. as regards ita no.270 of 2012, the assessing officer would be free to consider framing an assessment ..... .we have heard counsel for the parties, perused the impugned order as well as affidavits filed in each case, in court today. the order passed under the 1961 act which was foundation of order passed by the assessing officer has admittedly been set aside. we, therefore, find no reason to hold that orders passed by the cit(a .....

Hakam Singh and ors. Vs. Baljit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)144PLR555

..... property. i would also like to mention here that there are some differences between succession in hindus and succession in jat sikhs. before coming into force of hindu succession act, jat sikhs were required to prove ancestral nature of the property and they were also required to trace part of common ancestor i.e. first ..... . it is duty of the party alleging coparcenary nature of property and they should prove that person holding property at the time of coming into force of hindu succession act got the same from his father by way of survivorship. especially this is must in jat sikhs, because mitakhshara law became applicable to them only ..... after coming into force of the hindu succession act. there is lot of difference between property received by survivorship and property received by way of testamentary succession. in case of survivorship, deceased is .....

J.R. Gupta Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1984CriLJ694

..... it is necessary to detain him. now. therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3(1)(a)(ii) read with section 3(a) of the preventive detention act. 1950. the state govem-ment do hereby direct that the said hadibandhu das be detained in the district jail at cuttack until further orders.on february 8. 1968. the detenu ..... statutory formalities puts its signatures thereto.54. proviso to sub-section (4) would only mean this that if in pursuance of the detention order when it was validly in force, that is, the period of 12 days had not expired, the detenu is taken into custody thereunder and the grounds of detention are communicated to him by the ..... not fall within the terms of section 13(2). their lordships, after explaining the iudicial precedents relied upon on behalf of the state government, namely, basanta chandra ghose v. emperor air 1945 fc 18: 1945-46 cri lj 559 naranjan singh nathawan v. state of punjab : 1952crilj656 and shibban lal v. state of u. p. : [1954]1scr418 repelled .....

Joginder Pal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... medical report it was verified that during duty consumed liquor which under section 11(1) of central reserve police force act, 1949 is an offence."p.p. paulycommandant-190 bn" the enquiry officer submitted his report dated 22.12.2011 (annexure p-2), wherein, the allegation leveled in ..... the clothes of his body and was roaming in the camp/line and was uttering abusive words in line which under section 11(1) of central reserve police force act, 1949 is an offence. information of this hc/gd shriniwason was conveyed to the higher officials after which employee was examined at civil hospital chatra and in the ..... had not been foretold about the proposed consideration of his past adverse record. 21. this court approved the view taken by the high court and observed: (manche gowda case, air pp. 509-10, para 7) "7. under article 311(2) of the constitution, as interpreted by this court, a government servant must have a reasonable opportunity not .....

Banwari Lal Parshotam Dass Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1980]45STC480(P& H)

..... to be and to have always been imposed, taken or done as validly and effectively as if the provisions of sub-section (1) had been in force when such penalties were imposed or proceedings or acts or things were taken or done and, accordingly, -- (a) no suit or other proceedings shall be maintained or continued in or before any court ..... thing which could have been validly taken, continued or done for the imposition of such penalty at any time before the commencement of this act if the provisions of sub-section (1) had then been in force but which had not been taken, continued or done, may after such commencement be taken, continued or done....6. the provisions of the ..... article 20 must be understood to convey the meaning given to it in section 3(38) of the general clauses act. this section defines an 'offence' to mean an act or omission made punishable by any law for the time being in force. for interpreting the provisions of article 20(1) of the constitution, the provisions of sub-article (2) of .....

Sanjay Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)142PLR528

..... . it is not a matter of dispute, that the petitioners were inducted into service under the haryana industrial security force act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the act). consequent upon the repealing of the act, all the posts were abolished, whereupon, the services of the petitioners were dispensed with. this action at the hands ..... the haryana state industrial security force act, 2003 (hereinafter called as '2003 act') was passed in the assembly in the year 2003. but the '2003 act' was never enforced by the government as required under section 1(3) of the said act. neither the haryana state industrial security force was constituted by the state ..... the director general, inspector general, deputy inspector general, commandant, deputy commandant, assistant commandant of the force as supervisor offices within the meaning of section 4(1) of the act. the members of the force were to be recruitment/enrolled by the director general or such supervisory officer as authorised by the government .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Santro Devi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : I(1997)ACC211; 1997ACJ111; (1996)114PLR667

..... to any property of a third party a limit of rupees six thousand :provided that any policy of insurance issued with any limited liability and in force, immediately before the commencement of this act, shall continue to be effective four a period of for months after such commencement or till the date of expiry of such policy whichever is ..... note relates has been registered or to such other authority as the state government may prescribe.(5) notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, an insurer issuing a policy of insurance under this section shall be liable to indemnify the person or classes of persons specified in the policy in respect of ..... martins and ors. , 1985 aci 397; padma srinivasan v. premier insurance company ltd., 1982 acj 191; lalappa lingappa v. laxmi vishnu textile mills, air 1981 s.c. 852 ; rudul sah v. state of bihar and anr., air 1983 s.c. 1086 and b.v. nagaraju v. oriental insurance co, ltd, divisional office, hassan, (1996-3)114 p.l.r. 87 .....

Ram Saran Dass Kapur Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Patella

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H429; [1970]77ITR298(P& H)

..... succeeding income-tax officer afford any opportunity of re-hearing to the assessee. the case stood transferred to the succeeding income-tax officer before the income-tax (amendment) act (25 of 1953) which introduced section 5 (7-c) was passed. the division bench of the calcutta high court proceeded to answer the question whether the assessee ..... advantage in making the order of imposition of penalty by the a succeeding income-tax officer. the mandatory requirement of sub-section (3) of s. 28 of the act is in our opinion wholly independent of the enabling provision of section 5 (7-c). an order passed under section 28 (1) (c) without affording adequate ..... case may be, has been heard, or has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.''5 (7-c) whenever in respect of any proceeding under this act. an income-tax authority ceases to exercise jurisdiction and is succeeded by another who has and exercise jurisdiction, the income-tax authority so succeeding may continue be proceeding .....

Raghbir Singh Vs. Tilak Raj and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : I(1999)ACC27; 1999ACJ966; (1998)120PLR570

..... singh and ors., (1995-3)111 p.l.r. 512 and contended that a claimant is entitled to that much amount which is admissible under the provisions of the act in force at the relevant time. in the latter case, the question as raised by learned counsel for the appellant herein did not find favour with the learned single judge.7. smt ..... , a sum of rs. 25,000/- was payable in cases of 'no fault liability' yet having regard to the provisions of section 140(2) of the act which came into force on 14.11.1994 and provides for a payment of rs. 50,000/- on account of no fault liability in death cases, the appellant is also entitled to that much ..... (supra) was a case where a person had died in acci- dent which took place on 16.5.1989 when the motor vehicles act, 1939 was in force and in view of the provisions of section 92-a of that act, a sum of rs. 15,000/- was payable to the claimant on account of no fault liability in death case and thus .....