Advocate General - Judgment Search Results

Advocate-general of Bihar Vs. High Court Judicature at Patna

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1986(34)BLJR496; 1986(2)LC50(SC)

either affect the dignity of the judicial institution or the position and prestige of the high office of Advocate General. We would like to avoid either consequence because the dignity of the judicial institution which alone can ensure … This Is a rather unusual appeal in two respects. In the first place it is preferred by the Advocate-General of Bihar, the highest Law Officer in the State and leader of the Bar by virtue of his

Advocate-general, State of Bihar Vs. Madhya Pradesh Khair Industries a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC946; 1980CriLJ684; (1980)3SCC311; [1980]2SCR1172; 1980(12)LC474(SC)

question of accepting the apology was not considered as the application was found to be beyond time. The Advocate General of Bihar has filed this appeal against the judgment of the Patna High Court.6. Before we consider the … O. Chinnappa Reddy, J. 1. The Advocate-General of Bihar is the appellant in this appeal under Section 19 of the Contempts of Courts Act, 1971.

Advocate General vs Antony.C.D

Court: Kerala

Matched in: Parties Advocate General vs Antony.C.D

Secretary to Advocate General vs State Information Commission

Court: Kerala

30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 7TH ASWINA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 7240 OF 2013 PETITIONERS: 1 SECRETARY TO ADVOCATE GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KERALA, ERNAKULAM. … / 7TH ASWINA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 7240 OF 2013 PETITIONERS: 1 SECRETARY TO ADVOCATE GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 3 THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY

Secretary to Advocate General vs State Information Commissioner

Court: Kerala

30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 7TH ASWINA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 7240 OF 2013 PETITIONERS: 1 SECRETARY TO ADVOCATE GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KERALA, ERNAKULAM. … / 7TH ASWINA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 7240 OF 2013 PETITIONERS: 1 SECRETARY TO ADVOCATE GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 3 THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY

Learned Addl. Advocate General Punjab Submits That on Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Sandhu, Sr.Standing Counsel for UOI with Ms.Puneeta Sethi, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2 and 3. Mr.Alok Jain, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents No.4 and 5. Mr.Amit Singh Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.6. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) … respondents No.4 and 5. Mr.Amit Singh Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.6. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) Learned Addl. Advocate General, Punjab submits that on verification of the records it has been found that the petitioners were not associated

“learned Addl.Advocate General Punjab Submits That there Vs. State o ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

was disposed of on 10.10.2013, by a Division Bench of this Court, with the following observations: “Learned Addl.Advocate General, Punjab submits that there have been some amendments to the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 subsequent to the … of the petition which may have redressed most of the grievances of the petitioneRs.if not all. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioneRs.however, submits that all the grievances have not been redressed but in view of the fresh

Advocate General, High Court of Karnataka Vs. Chidambara and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2004CriLJ493; ILR2003KAR3631

Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.5. Later on C.P. No. 1362/2000 came to be filed by Sri Balakrishna Shastry, Advocate, on behalf of respondent Nos. 1,3, 4. Similarly C.P.No. 1047/2000 also came to be filed on behalf of

Advocate General Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(1)ALD708; 2004(2)ALT460

orders of this Court. The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad published notification in the newspapers dated 7.3.2000 informing the general public and builders of multistoried complexes and apartments/ blocks about the orders of the Court and requested them … Ruilders, Flat owners or Land owners, environmentalists etc., may appear before the Court either in person or through Counsel duly instructed, on that day.5. After receiving notices, the respondents - Government of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Builders Federation,

Advocate General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Ashok Kumar

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(1)ALT52; 1994CriLJ1333

basis of the material on record proposing proceedings against the respondent under the Contempt of Court Act. The Advocate General, to whom the matter was referred, filed this Contempt Case seeking action to punish the respondent for criminal