Advocate General - Judgment Search Results

Advocate-general of Bihar Vs. High Court Judicature at Patna

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1986(34)BLJR496; 1986(2)LC50(SC)

either affect the dignity of the judicial institution or the position and prestige of the high office of Advocate General. We would like to avoid either consequence because the dignity of the judicial institution which alone can ensure … This Is a rather unusual appeal in two respects. In the first place it is preferred by the Advocate-General of Bihar, the highest Law Officer in the State and leader of the Bar by virtue of his

Advocate-general, State of Bihar Vs. Madhya Pradesh Khair Industries a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC946; 1980CriLJ684; (1980)3SCC311; [1980]2SCR1172; 1980(12)LC474(SC)

question of accepting the apology was not considered as the application was found to be beyond time. The Advocate General of Bihar has filed this appeal against the judgment of the Patna High Court.6. Before we consider the … O. Chinnappa Reddy, J. 1. The Advocate-General of Bihar is the appellant in this appeal under Section 19 of the Contempts of Courts Act, 1971.

Advocate General vs Antony.C.D

Court: Kerala

Matched in: Parties Advocate General vs Antony.C.D

Learned Addl. Advocate General Punjab Submits That on Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Sandhu, Sr.Standing Counsel for UOI with Ms.Puneeta Sethi, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2 and 3. Mr.Alok Jain, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents No.4 and 5. Mr.Amit Singh Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.6. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) … respondents No.4 and 5. Mr.Amit Singh Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.6. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) Learned Addl. Advocate General, Punjab submits that on verification of the records it has been found that the petitioners were not associated

“learned Addl.Advocate General Punjab Submits That there Vs. State o ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

was disposed of on 10.10.2013, by a Division Bench of this Court, with the following observations: “Learned Addl.Advocate General, Punjab submits that there have been some amendments to the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 subsequent to the … of the petition which may have redressed most of the grievances of the petitioneRs.if not all. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioneRs.however, submits that all the grievances have not been redressed but in view of the fresh

Advocate General, High Court of Karnataka Vs. Chidambara and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2004CriLJ493; ILR2003KAR3631

Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.5. Later on C.P. No. 1362/2000 came to be filed by Sri Balakrishna Shastry, Advocate, on behalf of respondent Nos. 1,3, 4. Similarly C.P.No. 1047/2000 also came to be filed on behalf of

Advocate General Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(1)ALD708; 2004(2)ALT460

orders of this Court. The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad published notification in the newspapers dated 7.3.2000 informing the general public and builders of multistoried complexes and apartments/ blocks about the orders of the Court and requested them … Ruilders, Flat owners or Land owners, environmentalists etc., may appear before the Court either in person or through Counsel duly instructed, on that day.5. After receiving notices, the respondents - Government of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Builders Federation,

Advocate General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Ashok Kumar

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(1)ALT52; 1994CriLJ1333

basis of the material on record proposing proceedings against the respondent under the Contempt of Court Act. The Advocate General, to whom the matter was referred, filed this Contempt Case seeking action to punish the respondent for criminal

Advocate-general of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Chennamsetty Chakrapani C.i. of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1997(3)ALD588; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)92; 1997(3)ALT328; 1997(2)APLJ54; 1997CriLJ3333

Judge, Guntur recorded the evidence of PW 1 to 4 produced in support of the petitioner i.e. the Advocate General of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and the evidence of R.W. 1 to 4 produced on behalf of the respondents/contemnors. … available to the respondent/contemnors and thereafter the respective counsel were heard. 6. The learned counsel appearing for the Advocate General submitted that on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence of PWs 1 to 4 it is

The Advocate-general, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. A. Gopal Alias Gop ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1996(1)ALD(Cri)517; 1996(2)ALT70; 1996CriLJ3724

a case of criminal contempt against the respondent, Dr. A. Gopal, on a motion made by the learned Advocate General by way of a petition dated 12-7-1994 supported by an affidavit of a section officer in the office … of a petition dated 12-7-1994 supported by an affidavit of a section officer in the office of the Advocate General. Congizance was taken by a Division Bench of this Court on 21-12-1994 and notice to the respondent for