Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Advocate General vs Antony.C.D

Advocate General vs Antony.C.D

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 20, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1374124

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/289/1999

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Advocate General

Respondent

Antony.C.D

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice mohammed nias c.p. monday, the 20th day of march 2023 / 29th phalguna, 1944 rp no. 289 of 1998 against the order/judgmentop 4680/1996 of high court of kerala review petitioner/s: jancy joseph. by adv sri.c.g.sunil respondent/s: union of india. by advs. smt.chincy gopakumar sri.p.k.raghavan sri.viju thomas by g.p. sri. v.s.sreejith this review petition having come up for admission on 20.03.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: r.p.no.289 of 1998mohammed nias c.p., j.…......................................................................... r.p. no. 289 of 1998 ….......................................................................... dated this the 20th day of march, 2023orderlearned counsel for the parties submit that they do not have any instructions in the matter. at this distance of time, there is no likelihood of the reliefs sought in the above case surviving. accordingly, the r.p. is closed without prejudice to the right of the parties to file an application seeking restoration, if there is anything surviving for consideration on the basis of the cause of action urged in the above case. sd/- mohammed nias c.p., judge al/-/20.3.2023.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1944 RP NO. 289 OF 1998 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTOP 4680/1996 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/S: JANCY JOSEPH. BY ADV SRI.C.G.SUNIL RESPONDENT/S: UNION OF INDIA. BY ADVS. SMT.CHINCY GOPAKUMAR SRI.P.K.RAGHAVAN SRI.VIJU THOMAS BY G.P. SRI. V.S.SREEJITH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.No.289 of 1998

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.

…......................................................................... R.P. No. 289 OF 1998 ….......................................................................... Dated this the 20th day of March, 2023

ORDER

Learned counsel for the parties submit that they do not have any instructions in the matter. At this distance of time, there is no likelihood of the reliefs sought in the above case surviving. Accordingly, the R.P. is closed without prejudice to the right of the parties to file an application seeking restoration, if there is anything surviving for consideration on the basis of the cause of action urged in the above case. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JUDGE al/-/20.3.2023.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial