1986 2 Scc23723 - Judgment Search Results

B.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(104)DRJ161

period of absence from 16th june 1986 till 16th october 1986 by treating the said period as the extraordinary leave cannot june 1986 made the following observations in his representation dated 28 12 91 he denied the charge and has challenged the

Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3579

date with regard to the competitive examination of the year 1986 the qualification possessed by the petitioner at the time of 81 and the certificate of having passed such examination dated 26 6 81 have been placed on record with the petition

B.S. Mathur and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2009SC137; JT2008(11)SC173; (2008)7MLJ1165(SC); 2008(13)SCALE300; (2008)10SCC271; 2008AIRSCW7042; 2009(1)LHSC399; 2008(6)LHSC3892

down in the o m of dopt dated 3 7 1986 iii principle of continuous length of service i e date recruits rule 8 provides for inter se seniority rule 8 2 provides that inter se seniority of the direct recruits vis

Anil Chemicals and Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)18VST22(MP)

of the madhya pradesh deferment of payment of tax rules 1986 it moved an application before the directorate of industries for commercial tax act 1994 under section 17 3 and 45b 2 of act of 1958 was determined as payable 6 it

Rational Committee of Homeopathies and ors. and Dr. Nitya Kaushal Sinh ...

Court : Patna

84 session or 1981 to 1985 batch or 1982 to 1986 session who were all pursuing the same course and were bench judgment of bombay high court since reported in 1986 2 service law reporter 159 and in the case of mrs

Sukomal Baul and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR622(Jhr)]

by the land acquisition judge by order dated 31 1 1986 2 being aggrieved by the said order the appellants preferred 18 000 per acre in terms of the judgment dated 21 6 1984 and accordingly the said court made an award

Rakesh K. Dhawan and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

statutory bodies are within the purview of consumer protection act 1986 50 thus in our view where the whole locality or drainage has 4 ft depth and 21 mm length if 21 mm is the length knee deep water cannot be logged

Naveen Wadhwa Vs. Anil Kumar Ajmani and Others.

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

show cause notice section 27 of the consumer protection act 1986 prescribes penalties for failure or omission by any trader or appellant and in that too the amount found was rs 2 23 948 56 and on verification the said statement was

Board of Trustees for Port of Calcutta and ors. Vs. Avijit Kumar Ray a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2009(121)FLR399]; (2009)IILLJ535SC; 2008(15)SCALE450; (2009)1SCC743; 2009(3)SLJ132(SC):2009(2)LHSC908:2009AIRSCW687

1985 became enforceable and binding the letter of july 30 1986 referred to by mr krishnamani is as follows dear sir to apprentices completing the training course under that establishment para 2 2 of the circular read as follows 50 of the

Mohd. Aziz Ul Haq Since Deceased Through Lrs., Dr. Mohib S/O Mohammad ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(6)MhLj482

section 106 of transfer of property act on 8 3 1986 and small cause civil suit was filed for recovery of had filed vakalatnama for the respondent has stated that on 24 1 2002 itself he filed pursis vide stamp no 679