Skip to content


1986 2 Sick - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: 1986 2 sick Page 1 of about 300 results (1.252 seconds)
Dec 05 2000 (SC)

A.J. Fernandis Vs. the Divisional Manager, South Central Railway and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001(49)BLJR1408; [2001(88)FLR435]; 2000(8)SCALE61; (2001)1UPLBEC310

thereafter promoted as a senior ticket collector on 25th september 1986 the appellant was then promoted as a train ticket examiner 3rd respondent appeared but was again not selected 9 on 25th september 1986 the appellant was promoted to the grade of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 1991 (HC)

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Venkateswara Oil Producers

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1992]86STC127(AP)

the penalty was sought to be imposed on march 31 1986 long after the assessment was made and not at the petitioner this court held the language employed in section 14 2 of the act admits of no doubt and empowers the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 1988 (HC)

Laxminarayan Vs. Ramaswamy

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1989KAR1158; 1989(1)KarLJ28

of the supreme court reported in 1986 2 scc 709 1986 criminal law journal 1074 laying down that in the absence applying the decision of the supreme court reported in 1986 2 scc 709 1986 criminal law journal 1074 laying down that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 2012 (TRI)

K. Mani Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Others

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

order as to costs revision petitions dismissed consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 g 21 b cases referred 1 smt 447 sc ii 2001 dmc 139 sc iii 2001 ccr 24 sc air 2001 sc 2383 and shaikh rafiq and another

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 26 2001 (HC)

B. Meenakshi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)ALD96; 2002(2)ALT473

i e newspapers bombay private limited v union of india 1986 159itr856 sc the rule is not challenged on the ground the last date for selections was fixed as 3 10 2001 and the admissions were closed on 15 11 2001 md

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 09 2000 (HC)

National Horticulture Board Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2001]253ITR12(P& H)

by giving erratic irrational or irrelevant reasons consumer protection act 1986 c a no 68 1986 articles 14 300a government contract award of interest is implicit in the scheme of section 244a and interest cannot be claimed by the assessee as of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1994 (SC)

Srinivasa Cooperative House Buildings Society Ltd. Vs. Madam Gurumurth ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994(2)ALT36(SC); JT1994(4)SC197; (1995)109PLR331; 1994(2)SCALE785; (1994)4SCC675; [1994]3SCR848

appeals the division bench in writ appeal no 316 of 1986 etc by judgment dated december 6 1986 quashed the notification to article 31a of the constitution is unwarranted 3 section 2 c of the act defined company under per 1984 amendment

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 1986 (HC)

Digvijay Cement Company Limited Vs. Union of India

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1986(10)ECC359; 1987(10)LC7(Gujarat); 1986(25)ELT879(Guj); (1987)1GLR641

relevant time prior to reshuffling of the tariff items in 1986 the said raw material is imported from canada u s certain marginal changes were made in rule 56a 1 and 2 read with proviso clauses a and b after these changes

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 2014 (HC)

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Mumbai

union carbide india ltd v union of india and ors 1986 2 scc 547 61 triveni engineering and industries ltd and of maharashtra 2007 vol 109 1 bom l r 0585 24 municipal corporation of greater bombay vs indian oil corporation 1991

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 08 2005 (HC)

Kaju Devi and anr. Vs. H.S. Rudrappa Alias Rudy and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2005KAR4370; 2006(2)KarLJ551

..... reliance placed by the defendants counsel upon the decisions reported in 1986 2 scc 709 para 12 1995 4 scc 96 para 8 in ..... in support of their defence as the first defendant became sick and she was bedridden for the aforesaid reason they could not ..... on their behalf for the reason that the first defendant was sick and bedridden and therefore she could not give instructions to her .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //