1986 2 Scc23723 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1986 2 scc23723 Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.173 seconds)Mansoor Ahmad Vs. Industrial Tribunal (i), U.P., Allahabad and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-08-2002
Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1252; [2002(93)FLR699]; (2002)2UPLBEC1522
no question of termination of his services on 8 9 1986 was found to have arisen and the concerned workman was and other benefits admissible under law since 8 9 1986 2 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.K. Oswal and ors. Vs. Mr. Akshay Finance and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-09-2002
Reported in : [2003]115CompCas577(Delhi); [2004]50SCL303(Delhi)
the erstwhile petitions viz c p nos 21 to 26 1986 it is imperative to mention that all the companies in shroff and mr pinaki misra for the respondent cp nos 21 to 26 of 1986 it is indeed gratifying to note
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudhakar Shridhar Shelar Vs. Steelage Industries Ltd. and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-01-2002
Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR266; [2002(95)FLR1124]
no 1 he was transferred to frfcf department in january 1986 a charge sheet was issued to him on 30 9 if the respondent pay him an amount of rs 1 25 000 in lieu of any further demands with respect to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJalani Vs. Gulashunabi
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-15-2002
Reported in : ILR2004KAR3045; 2003(2)KarLJ270
p c in view of the specific provisions under the 1986 act held irrespective of the personal law of the parties is not maintainable to this extent the judgment reported in 2006 4 kccr 2677 do not lay down the correct law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSaman Ismail Vs. Rafiq Ahmad and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : May-24-2002
Reported in : 2002CriLJ3648; II(2002)DMC430
act the muslim women protection of rights on divorce rules 1986 have been made rule 2 b provides that the code under muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986 2 on the application moved by the applicant under section 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSanjiv Mahajan Vs. Union of India
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-25-2002
Reported in : [2002]125TAXMAN606(Delhi)
relevance as per the said office memorandum dated 7 2 1986 10 a seniority list of income tax officers on all at the interview 6 in the meantime on or about 22 9 1988 a seniority list of income tax inspectors based
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Kamalakar Nandram Bhavsar and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-31-2002
Reported in : I(2003)DMC358
the trial court is perverse mina died on 28 4 1986 soon after at 10 o clock after she was admitted dated 19 2 1986 exhibit 22 is letter dated 25 2 1986 exhibit 23 is letter dated 7 3 1986 exhibit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDinesh Pratap Singh Vs. Regional Deputy Labour Commissioner and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Aug-21-2002
Reported in : 2002(4)AWC3236; [2002(95)FLR347]; (2003)1UPLBEC47
work at our agra centre with effect from 1st june 1986 2 you will assist the veterinary officer incharge of agra at our agra centre with effect from 1st june 1986 2 you will assist the veterinary officer incharge of agra centre
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSh. Madan Lamba Vs. Shri Jagdish Lamba and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-03-2002
Reported in : 2002(63)DRJ732
dated january 1982 and made their awards on 25 10 1986 these are non speaking awards it is alleged by the application for extending the time was made on 5 2 2001 the fact that parties to arbitration proceedings have acted upon
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.P. State Electricity Board Vs. the Collector and anr.
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-26-2002
Reported in : 2003ACJ971; AIR2003MP156; 2003(1)MPHT371
of act 1991 read with section 2 e of act 1986 held purpose of act 1991 was to provide immediate relief v city and county of san francisco d c cal 23 f supp 40 52 it cannot be denied that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT