1986 2 Scc23723 - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner, Customs Central Excise And Service Tax, Patna Vs. M/s. S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... intention of the legislature to others as well as judges 18 1986 2 scc23723 32 keeping the above said ratio in mind an interpretation ..... body established by the government as envisaged under sub clause ii of clause 2 s that has to meet the requirement of governmental ..... the provisions contained in sub clause i and sub clause ii of clause 2 s are independent disjunctive provisions and the expression 90 .....

Laxminarayan Vs. Ramaswamy

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1158; 1989(1)KarLJ28

of the supreme court reported in 1986 2 scc 709 1986 criminal law journal 1074 laying down that in the absence anr criminal appeal no 184 of 1979 decided on april 25 1986 the law laid down by the supreme court is

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

the benefit of exemption under a notification no 217 of 1986 the revenue declined to grant benefit of exemption the tribunal cce new delhi vs hindustan sanitary ware and industries ltd 2002 145 elt sc f orders of the bombay high court

Kaju Devi and anr. Vs. H.S. Rudrappa Alias Rudy and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4370; 2006(2)KarLJ551

s gauraya and anr v s n thakur and anr 1986crilj1074 wherein the apex court has held that the decision of vashdeo bhojwaniand anr v indusind bank limited and ors ilr 2005 kar 729 in support of his legal contention that gp

Sunrise Associates Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2000)10SCC420

in h anraj case reported in 1986 1 scc 414 1986 scc tax 190 doubted the judgment in h anraj1 held ticket to participate in the lottery draw was so liable 2 the judgment in h anraj1 held that only the transfer

Sher Bahadur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC3030; 2002(4)AWC2877(SC); [2002(95)FLR11]; [2002(1)JCR12(SC)]; JT2002(6)SC152; 2002LabIC2974; (2002)IIILLJ848SC; 2002(5)SCALE616; (2002)7SCC142; [2002]SUPP1SCR568;

vii to ix of railway servants discipline amp appeal rules 1986 2 the unsuccessful appellant before the high court of judicature civil misc writ petition no 53498 of 2000 on may16 2001 3 the appellant claims that he had worked as a

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangaba ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1997(92)ELT23(SC); JT1997(10)SC737; (1997)9SCC681

schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 5 of 1986 from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon 1449 p h fb vijay sharma v state of punjab 2002 lab ic 2026 p h fb overruled dhirendra chamoli anr

Shaik Raj Mohammed Vs. Shaik Ameena Bee and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT(Cri)579; 1993CriLJ3690

enactment of muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986 act is only prospective in operation maintenance granted prior to have become final by the time the act is passed 2 in the circumstances this petition is devoid of merits and

Rajiv Kochar Vs. R.S. Sharma and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2000(10)SC449; (2002)9SCC624

that the ratio of the decision in h anraj case 1986 1 scc 414 fully supported the contention of the states by time no costs delhi sales tax act 1975 sections 2 g 1 3 4 b n agrawal g s singhvi

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Harinder Pal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC447; 2006(1)ALT7(SC); 2006(1)AWC26(SC); JT2005(9)SC280; (2005)12SCC564

judge decision in h anraj v government of t n 1986 1 scc 414 holding otherwise had not laid down the alone those were goods thus the decision in sunrise case 2006 5 scc 603 in no way affected the position in