1975 2 Scc 240 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1975 2 scc 240 Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.311 seconds)Indira Sawant and Others Vs. Vijayendra Umakant Sheth and Others
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
applicable to those who were not in government service on 27 10 1997 or in november 1997 obviously if any mistake and ors vs rajbir singh and ors and 2013 11 scc 517 in case of sharanammaand ors vs managing director divisional monthly gross salary of the deceased to be rs 7 240 after deduction of rs 30 towards cghs contribution rs 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMithlesh Bai Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Its Secretary, ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
falls under the definition of forest as given under section 2 of the forest conservation act 1980 she further states that of m c mehta vs union of india 2009 6 scc 142 while stressing the need for regulating the mining activities of section 258 read with sub section 1 of section 240 of the madhya pradesh land revenue code 1959 the state
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHanumappa Vs. Yallakka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-03-2014
taken by the kerala high court in vasu v santha 1975 ker lt 533 as a special protection is given by for more than 280 days before roshan lai defendant no 2 was begotten by the defendant no 1 14 the said court then finally concluded thus goutam kundu case 1993 3 scc 418 428 para 26 1 that courts in india cannot
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and Another Vs. Syed Sahe ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: May-03-2014
of the court in the case of cooper engineering ltd 1975 2 lab lj 379 air 1975 sc 1900 has not at 1984 4 scc 491 has held as under oelig 2 we are therefore clearly of opinion that when a case company limited vs ludh budh singh reported in 1972 1 scc 595 concluded in paragraph nos 19 20 21 22 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Shatrunjaya Shetty and Others Vs. Land Tribunal, Karkala, Udupi Dis ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
arrayed as respondent before the tribunal subsequently on 8 12 1975 the land was partitioned between the members of family of of assistant transport commissioner uttar pradesh v nani singh 1979 2 kar l j sh n 72 db and in the l and s 388 2009 air scw 1644 2009 2 scc 479 it has been held that delay defeats equity and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: The Commissioner and Secretary, Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
interference in these two orders 7 5 2010 27 7 2010 are called for in these proceedings then whether the matter in later years is the one reported in 1997 7 scc 622 mansukhlal vithaldas chauhan vs state of gujarat in this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Others Vs. Bhagga and Others
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
government and government undertaking this court observed as under oelig 29 it needs no restatement at our hands that the object 123 and 10 vedabai v shantaram baburao patil 2001 9 scc 106 19 apex courtin anshulaggarwal vs new okhla industrial development
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConros Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Lu Qin (Hong Kong) Company Ltd. and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
limited vs punjab and haryana papers chemical and another 2008 2 arb lr 365 delhi a division bench of the delhi exims ltd vs sri lakshmi knits and wovens 2007 3 scc 686 the supreme court held as under 22 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Ltd. (Formerly Cholamandalam ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
balwinder singh v asstt commissioner v 2005 slt 195 iii 2005 ccr 8 sc cce 2005 4 scc 146 13 in 2001 slt 26 i 2001 ccr 9 sc 2001 2 scc 17 and balwinder singh v asstt commissioner v 2005 slt
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chief Post Master General, Odisha Circle, at/Po-pmg Square, Bhuban ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Apr-02-2014
agony to the complainant with cost of litigation of rs 2 000 v the loss if any sustained by the govt 123 and 10 vedabai v shantaram baburao patil 2001 9 scc 106 18 apex courtin anshulaggarwal vs new okhla industrial development
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT