1975 2 Act 240 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1975 2 act 240 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.239 seconds)Hegde and Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: ILR1987KAR604
..... case and it is accordingly dismissed customs tariff act 1975 central act no 51 of 1975 section 3 applicability levies countervailing duty on article ..... this writ petition 3 the petitioner relying upon the notification 240 78 cus annexure c has urged that the levy of ..... for the purpose of manufacture of watches in its factory 2 the collector of customs and central excise bangalore levied additional .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe High Commissioner for India and the High Commissioner for Pakistan ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR649
as the provision now in sub section 2 of section 240 which was the subject of decision in rangachari s case crown that may have occurred since the raising of the action is not covered by the present suit 24 the appellant of the crown recognised in sub section 1 of section 240 of 1935 the provisions of section 96b 1 now reproduced
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavi Gupta Vs. Commissioner Sales Tax, Delhi and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2009(237)ELT3(SC); JT2009(4)SC543; 2009(5)SCALE301; (2009)5SCC208; [2009]20STT153; 2009(4)LC2030(SC); (2009)11VatReporter141; (2009)22VST529(SC)
sales tax act 1956 appellant dealer registered under act of 1975 and act of 1956 assessments completed by assessing officer for officer for the assessment years 1999 2000 2000 2001 and 2001 2002 under the act and cst act the total demand the central sales tax act 1956 appellant dealer registered under act of 1975 and act of 1956 assessments completed by assessing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProvince of Punjab Vs. Pandit Tara Chand
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1947)49BOMLR697
if no such action could successfully be maintained by mr 2 where the attachable proportion of such salary or allowances is by way of appeal under section 205 of the constitution act 1942 f c r 118 the court went on however act of 1915 could the imperial parliament in enacting section 240 and being deemed aware of the provisions of section 60
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProvince of Bombay Vs. Madhukar Ganpat Nerlekar
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1952Bom37; (1951)53BOMLR754; ILR1952Bom269
service and was therefore governed by section 243 now section 243 says that the conditions of service for police officers of he was quite unable to hold that the committee had acted otherwise than honestly and in good faith from these observations inoperative as it offended against the mandatory provisions of section 240 3 of the government of india act 1935 the plaintiff
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaja Narayanlal Bansilal Vs. Maneck Phiroz Mistry and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1961SC29; (1961)63BOMLR251; [1960]30CompCas644(SC); [1961]1SCR417
clauses of the said article the every wording of art 20 observed bhagwati j and the words used therein convicted commission mind that it occurs in that part of the new act which deals with repeals and savings sections 645 to 648 consider the said decision our conclusion therefore is that s 240 does not offend against art 20 3 of the constitution
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.M. Rajagopalan Vs. State of Madras and anr.
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR1954Mad1155
amply assured of their position in our view section 10 2 does not lend itself to an argument based upon it the governor general under section 9 c of the independence act to justify the position taken by the government under that is obvious instead of adopting the course laid in section 240 3 of the government of india act and the rules
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTarak Nath Ghosh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1968SC1372; 1968LabIC1514; [1968]3SCR224
held that in the case of k m rajagopalan 1955 2scr541 it had been decided that the conferral of independence on that the grounds on which it is proposed to take action must be reduced to the form of a definite charge control and appeal rules 1930 and sections 240 2 and 240 3 of government of india act 1935 appellant appointed in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohana Rao G. Vs. State Government of Andhra and Two ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: (1959)IILLJ272AP
does not attract the protective provisions of the art 311 2 even in such cases if the government chose to proceed and 3 of s 240 if the government of india act 1935 are as follows 310 i except as expressly provided constitution of india and sections 240 1 240 2 and 240 3 of government of india act 1935 magistrate and high
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Atul Products Ltd.
Court: Gujarat
Reported in: [1998]232ITR646(Guj)
..... he proposed to rectify by another letter dt 21st june 1975 the ito observed that the naphthalene intermediates expansion plant ni plant ..... and miscellaneous provisions act 1986 effective from 1 4 1988 and section 80j has been replaced by the finance no 2 act 1991 effective from ..... other than a seasonal one the actual working days or 240 days whichever was greater the expression factory or concern in this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT