1975 2 Scc 240 - Judgment Search Results

Chauhan Rajendrasinhji Takhatsinhji Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1978Guj126; (1978)GLR785

..... mr m m shah is in dhararn singh rathi v hari singh m l a 1975 2 scc 240 air 1975 sc 1274 it was also a case under the conduct of elections rules 1961 made ..... filing nomination paper could not be made good or rectified at the time of scrutiny 1975 2 scc 240 air 1975 sc 1274 it was also a case under the conduct of elections rules 1961 made .....

Daya Nand Sahay Vs. Kapil Sibal and ors.

Court : Patna

..... has placed strong reliance on dharam singh rathi v hari singh 1975 2 scc 240 air 1975 sc 1274 in support of his contention that in absence of ..... has distinguished the ratio in dharam singh rathi s case air 1975 sc 1274 supra with the present case he submitted that the ..... hereinabove relied upon by sri sharma and the decision in air 1975 sc 1612 have been considered and distinguished on facts as a .....

Navuba Gokaiji Chavda and ors. Vs. Returning Officer and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1982Guj281; (1982)2GLR397

..... court in dharam singh rathi v hari singh m l a 1975 2 scc 240 air 1975 sc 1274 in the aforesaid decision the supreme court was ..... taluka and district panchayat election rules 1975 rule 15 2 of these rules is pari materia with r 10 2 of the election rules in ..... officer had not discharged his function as contemplated by r 15 2 when the returning officer examined the nomination papers he should have .....

Commr. of Income Tax, Dibrugarh Vs. Doom Dooma India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(SC)105; [2009]310ITR392(SC); 2009(3)SCALE663; (2009)4SCC427; [2009]178TAXMAN261(SC)

..... law laid down in madeva upendra sinai v union of india 1975 3 scc 765 it was held depreciation actually allowed is the depreciation actually ..... illustrations the income taxable by applying rule 8 comes to rs 240 in both the cases the only difference is that in illustration ..... written down value of the building machinery and plant under paragraph 2 of the taxation laws order 1950 only the greater of the .....

Dharti Pakar Madan Lal Agarwal Vs. K.R. Narayanan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC1462; JT1997(9)SC252; (1997)8SCC766; [1997]Supp5SCR335

ac 189 state of bihar v dr asis kumar mukherjee 1975 3 scc 602 1975 scc l amp s 51 1975 694 1984 scc l amp s 173 1984 2 scr 299 relied on syed khalid rizvi v union of india 1993 reclamation corpn ltd v presiding officer labour court 1990 3 scc 682 1991 scc l amp s 71 referred to if

Sri Chand Kasera and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1998)8SCC725

1975 3 scc 602 1975 scc l amp s 51 1975 2 scr 894 state of karnataka v hansa corpn 1980 3 scc 602 1975 scc l amp s 51 1975 2 scr 894 state of karnataka v hansa corpn 1980 4 reclamation corpn ltd v presiding officer labour court 1990 3 scc 682 1991 scc l amp s 71 referred to if

Kumari Sehej Gupta and anr. Vs Shri M.L. Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

delhi it was purchased by the grandfather on 1 01 1975 with his personal funds and is his self acquired property him on 29 06 05 by receipt no 661010 c 215 maker chamber mumbai it was purchased by the grandfather on belongs ref anil kumar roy choudhury v cit 1976 4 scc 776 this was stated in d s lakshmaiah v l

Ahmad Ali Akhtar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Patna

case of har shankar v dy excise and taxation commissioner 1975 3scr254 the supreme court pointed out that the state has the matter in details 7 2 4 under sub section 2 of section 3 such notification under sub section 1 of india citations a i r 1973 sc 1425 1975 3 scc 198 and a i r 1978 sc 597 referrdd g

Jodhpur Chartered Accountants Society and anr. Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2002)176CTR(Raj)177

judgments of the apex court reference may be made to 1975 101itr234 sc it is evident from the speech that tax being entered in the register of architects maintained under section 23 of the architects act 1972 20 of 1972 and also scc 656 ito v n takim roy rymbai 1976 1 scc 916 and mafatlal industries v union of india 1997 5

Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Circle I, Wa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC429; [1977]106ITR1(SC); (1977)1SCC408; [1977]2SCR92

laid down in madeva upendra sinai v union of india 1975 3 scc 765 it was held depreciation actually allowed is his reasons before initiating proceedings as required by section 148 2 another requirement is that before notice is issued after the in madeva upendra sinai v union of india 1975 3 scc 765 it was held depreciation actually allowed is the depreciation