Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tribhuban Sah Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1543 of 2012 Tribhuban Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 11.01.2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case instituted under Sections 406, 468 and 418 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that save and except the ocular allegation made in the complaint there is no document to support the allegation. The further contention is that on the allegations made in the complaint ingredients of the offence under Sections 406, 468 and 418 of the IPC are not attracted. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Tribhuban Sah in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/-(five thousa...
Okhi Ram @ Aukhi Ram @ Pokhi Ram @ Pankaj Ram Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44615 of 2011 Okhi Ram @ Aukhi Ram @ Pokhi Ram @ Pankaj Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------11. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is in jail custody since 18-08- 2011 in a case registered under Section-302 and other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, petitioner gave single Lathi blow on the head of the deceased and after that, other accused persons assaulted the deceased with Lathi. In postmortem report, altogether 4 injuries were found on the person of the deceased and it is pointed out by learned counsel appearing for the informant that the deceased sustained fatal injury on his head and the petitioner is author of the aforesaid injury. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that even if it assumed that the petitioner is author of the injuries found on the head of the deceased...
Amar Kishore Singh Vs. the Union India and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.533 of 2012 Amar Kishore Singh, son of Late Brahmdeo Narayan Singh, resident of Radhika Niwas, (Top Floor), Dr. Manoj Jha, Residence Street, R.B.B.S. Road, Bhikhanpur, P.S.- Ishakchak, District Bhagalpur------------------------petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways through its Secretary, Transport Bhawan, New Delhi 2. National Highway Authority of India, through its Chairman G-5 and 6, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075 3. The Chairman, National Highway Authority of India, G - 5 & 6, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075 4. General Manager (Administration), National Highways Authority of India, G - 5 and 6, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075 5. Member (Administration), National Highways Authority of India, G - 5 and 6, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075 6. Chief General Manager, Technical NE-NHAI, Regional office - Hengrabari, Barbari Bartila, V.I.P. Road, Near Pa...
Ram Charittar Pd.Sah @ Ram Chalittar Sah Vs. the State of Bihar and or ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1153 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2835 of 2010 ====================================================== Ram Charittar Pd.Sah @ Ram Chalittar Sah .... .... Appellant Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. Maruth Nath Roy, A.C. to S.C.-25 For the Respondent No.5: Mr. Baidya Nath Kahndelwal (in person) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 6. 11-01-2012 Learned advocate Ashok Kumar Gupta appears for the appellant. He states that the learned counsel Mr. Kameshwar Prasad Gupta is not available today. He, therefore, seeks adjournment. The Respondent no.5, who appears in person, has objection against adjour...
Ranjit Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7951 o1. Ranjit Kumar S/o late Janardan Prasad 2. Sanjay Kumar S/o late Janardan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Linepar Mirzapur, in front of Surya Mandir, Nawada, P.O., P.S. & District Nawada 3. Sanjay Pandey S/o late Ragho Pandey, resident of Village Kosi, P.O. Kosi, P.S. Roh, District Nawada. ... ... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Shiv Shankar Bhadani S/o late Kedar Nath Bhadoni, R/o Mohalla Linepar Mirzapur, in front of Surya Mandir, Nawada, P.O., P.S. & District Nawada. ... ... Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 2. 11.1.2012. Heard Shri Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 7.12.2010 passed in Complaint Case No.498/10/Tr. No.2653/2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Nawada, whereby the court below has taken cognizance for th...
Manisha Kumari and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.824 of 2012 Manisha Kumari & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 11.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State. The petitioners being the unmarried sisters of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341,323, 498A, 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code and of the D. P. Act. Though there are accusations of torture, demand of dowry and assault. Learned counsel for the informant submits that 164 Cr. P.C. statement of nephew suggests that these petitioners also participated in disposal of dead body. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that still the case has not been registered under Section 302 of I.P.C. and husband is in custody. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against husband, let the petitioners, Manisha Kumari and Parwati Kumari, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below withi...
Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1429 of 2012 Kundan Singh, Son of Srichand Singh, Resident of Village- Samrigarh, P.S.-Roh, District-Nawada. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Sinha, Advocate. For the State : APP. ---------------------------------- 02/ 11.01.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. In a Complaint Case lodged by wife against the petitioner in which he has been made accused under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 26.08.2011 and he has properly behaved with his wife. He has tried his best to give the complainant full dignity and love but she is denying the company of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the...
Krishna Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44601 of 2011 Krishna Prasad, S/O-Late Bhagwan Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------11. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioner is in jail custody in Complaint Case No. 426 of 2009 in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. According to complaint case itself, the owner of the vehicle was co-accused Yogesh Singh and so far as petitioner is concerned, he played a role of mediator in selling of the vehicle in question. The grievance of the complainant is that although, he had already paid two lacs twenty five thousand to the petitioner and got possession of the vehicle but the petitioner and co-accused Yogesh Singh did not take any step to get the ownership of the vehicle transferred in the name of the complainant. Learned counsel...
Hari Gopal Basak and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2066 of 2011 Hari Gopal Basak & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 3. 11.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the opposite parties. It is submitted that in compliance of the order of the writ Court the respondents passed necessary appropriate orders granting the benefit of A.C.P. to the petitioners along with others on 29.3.2010. When the actual benefits of the same were not made available to the petitioners and directions were given on 12.10.2011 for personal appearance of opposite party nos. 3 and 4, out of spite they have passed fresh orders on 14.12.2011 varying the same to the prejudice of the petitioners contrary to law. The petitioners have been singled out for such treatment out of the several persons mentioned in the order dated 29.3.2010. They have been subjected to hostile discrimination vis--vis one Bipin Bihari Choudhary who is similarly situated...
Sikandar Yadav Vs. the Chancellor,raj Bhawan Patn
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.402 of 2012 Ram Pravesh Yadav Son Of Kailu Yadav Resident Of Village-Sultanpur, Mitti, P.O. & P.S.-Sabour, District-Bhagalpur . Petitioner Versus 1. The Chancellor, Raj Bhawan Patna 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusha, P.O. & P.S. Pusha, District- Samastipur 3. The Registrar, Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusha, P.O. & P.S. Pusha, District-Samastipur 4. The Principal, Bihar Agriculture College, Sabour, P.O. & P.S. Sabour, District-Bhagalpur . Respondents with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.405 of 2012 Rajesh Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Rupan Yadav Resident Of Village Mirzapur, Via-Rajpur, P.O. & P.S.-Sabour, District-Bhagalpur Petitioner Versus 1. The Chancellor, Raj Bhawan, Patna 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusha, P.O. & P.S. Pusha, District- Samastipur 3. The Registrar, Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusha, P.O. & P.S. Pusha, District-Samastipur 4. The Pr...