Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ranjit Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and anr

Ranjit Kumar and ors vs The State of Bihar and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974994

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjit Kumar and ors

Respondent

The State of Bihar and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.7951 o”1. ranjit kumar s/o late janardan prasad 2. sanjay kumar s/o late janardan prasad, resident of mohalla linepar mirzapur, in front of surya mandir, nawada, p.o., p.s. & district nawada 3. sanjay pandey s/o late ragho pandey, resident of village kosi, p.o. kosi, p.s. roh, district nawada. ... ... petitioners. versus 1. the state of bihar 2. shiv shankar bhadani s/o late kedar nath bhadoni, r/o mohalla linepar mirzapur, in front of surya mandir, nawada, p.o., p.s. & district nawada. ... ... opposite parties. ---------------------------------- 2. 11.1.2012. heard shri yogesh chandra verma, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and shri pawan kumar chaurasia, learned additional public prosecutor. the petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 7.12.2010 passed in complaint case no.498/10/tr. no.2653/2010 passed by the judicial magistrate, ist class, nawada, whereby the court below has taken cognizance for the offence under sections 406, 420, 323/34 of the indian penal code. issue notice to opposite party no.2 to file show cause as to why this petition be not disposed of at the stage of admission itself. notice to go through ordinary post as well as registered cover with a/d, for which requisites etc. must 2 be filed within ten days, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a bench. in view of the facts and circumstances, the court is of the opinion that there shall be stay of operation of order dated 7.12.2010 so far as petitioners are concerned. list this case either after service of notice or after appearance of opposite party no.2 whichever may be earlier. n.h./ ( rakesh kumar,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7951 o”

1. Ranjit Kumar S/o late Janardan Prasad 2. Sanjay Kumar S/o late Janardan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Linepar Mirzapur, in front of Surya Mandir, Nawada, P.O., P.S. & District Nawada 3. Sanjay Pandey S/o late Ragho Pandey, resident of Village Kosi, P.O. Kosi, P.S. Roh, District Nawada. ... ... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Shiv Shankar Bhadani S/o late Kedar Nath Bhadoni, R/o Mohalla Linepar Mirzapur, in front of Surya Mandir, Nawada, P.O., P.S. & District Nawada. ... ... Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 2. 11.1.2012. Heard Shri Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 7.12.2010 passed in Complaint Case No.498/10/Tr. No.2653/2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Nawada, whereby the court below has taken cognizance for the offence under sections 406, 420, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Issue notice to opposite party no.2 to file show cause as to why this petition be not disposed of at the stage of admission itself. Notice to go through ordinary post as well as registered cover with A/D, for which requisites etc. must 2 be filed within ten days, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. In view of the facts and circumstances, the court is of the opinion that there shall be stay of operation of order dated 7.12.2010 so far as petitioners are concerned. List this case either after service of notice or after appearance of opposite party no.2 whichever may be earlier. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial