Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sachidanand Seth and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1032 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sachidanand Seth, S/O Radhey Shyam Seth.2. Permanand Seth, S/O Radhey Shyam Seth.3. Vikash Seth, S/O Satyanand Seth. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.1364 of 2012 ====================================================== Radhey Shyam Seth, S/O Late Gunraj Seth @ Gunram Seth. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.1908 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Krishna Murari Seth, S/O Late Gunram Seth.2. Prem Prakash Seth, S/O Krishna Murari Seth. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-20...
Shyamnath Rai Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15817 of 2011 ====================================================== Shyamnath Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a compliant case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. With the agreement of both sides, the matter was referred to Mediation Centre of the Patna High Court on 26.09.2011. The report of the Mediation Centre, at Flag-A, reflects that no acceptable settlement could be reached between the parties. Both sides agree for mutual parting ways on payment of one time alimony. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to seek instruction with regard to the payment of one time alimony. Put up this case on 13th of February, 2012 at 2.10 PM in Chambers. ...
Ajit Sanghai @ Bhola Sanghai Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.983 of 2012 Ajit Sanghai @ Bhola Sanghai Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 494 of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner is ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesaid stand of the petitioner, let the petitioner namely Ajit Sanghai @ Bhola Sanghai, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with G.R. No. 1008 of 2011 arising out of Haveli Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 136 of 2011. Let learned Court below issue notice to th...
Laxman Pandey @ Deo Kumar Pandey Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1118 of 2012 ====================================================== Laxman Pandey @ Deo Kumar Pandey .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 448 and 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of entering into the house and attempting to establish forceful physical relationship. It is submitted by learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is next door neighbour of the informant and there was some land dispute between the parties and for that the case has been lodged after three days of the alleged occurrence. Considering the delayed lodging of the F.I.R. which clouds the bona fide of the accusation, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail ...
Bashishth Sah Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38108 of 2011 Bashishth Sah, S/O-Late Chaturbhuj Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 12.07.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16824 of 2011 with an observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after four months, if his trial is not concluded within the above stated period. The learned Magistrate has reported that he will conclude the trial of the petitioner within two months. Therefore, it is apparent that up-till-now the trial of the petitioner has not been concluded. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amoun...
Sadanand Ram Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.210 of 2012 Sadanand Ram Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.10.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 406 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that in S.G.R.G.Y., the petitioner was given 878.71 quintals of rice for distribution, out of which 376 quintals of rice were distributed but 502.71 quintals of rice were not distributed nor the petitioner returned Rs. 6,88,712.70/- for the remaining rice. It is submitted that for the scheme of 2006, F.I.R. was lodged in 2011 and calculation has been made without verification and proper enquiry. Considering the period under custody, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Madhepura, in connecti...
Vijay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33939 of 2011 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage was performed in the year 2008 but it appears that the divorce case was filed on 14.06.2011 thereafter the present case has been lodged. From the order dated 12.10.2011 it further appears that reconciliation was going and it is submitted today that the ex-party divorce suit was decreed. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the informant has challenged the ex-parte decree of divorce. Considering the fact that the ex-parte divorce decree has been passed,...
Paramanand Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.990 of 2012 Paramanand Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 342, 353, 504/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that petitioner and his wife being Anganbari Sewika snatched the pen of the informant who is C.D.P.O. and threatened. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there was some dispute with the petitioners wife with the informant for that the present case has been lodged and with similar accusation the wife of the petitioner has been granted bail by learned Sessions Judge. Considering the nature of accusations and the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner namely Parmanand Singh, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand)...
Rameshwar Ram Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37242 of 2011 Rameshwar Ram, S/O-Late Beni Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 20.07.2011 in a case initially, registered under Section 307 and other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code but later on, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was also added. Allegedly, petitioner and other accused assaulted the deceased with different weapons as a result of which deceased sustained injury and she died in course of her treatment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and persons from both the sides have sustained injuries. In support of his contention, he drew my attention towards Annexure-3 to this petition. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the...
Chhabila Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30130 o1. Chhabila Singh, S/o late Mahendra Singh 2. Parmeshwar Singh, s/o late Mahendra singh Both resident of Chanchaura, P.S. Chapra, Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra Versus The State of Bihar ---------------------------------- 03. 13.01.2012 Heard the parties. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case no. 33 of 2011 for offence punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The dead body of the wife of the informant was found in the field with no eyewitness to the occurrence. The petitioners have been involved in the present case by reason of certain altercation that had taken place some days back between the wife of the informant and these petitioners. It is on the basis of the suspected involvement of these petitioners that they were made accused and had been taken into custody. Learned counsel for the petitioners, with reference to an order dated 23.11.2011 pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- Next ›
- Last »