Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shyamnath Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Shyamnath Rai vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974838

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shyamnath Rai

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.15817 of 2011 ====================================================== shyamnath rai .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”13. 01-2012 the petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a compliant case in which cognizance has been taken under section 498a of the indian penal code and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. with the agreement of both sides, the matter was referred to mediation centre of the patna high court on 26.09.2011. the report of the mediation centre, at flag-a, reflects that no acceptable settlement could be reached between the parties. both sides agree for mutual parting ways on payment of one time alimony. learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to seek instruction with regard to the payment of one time alimony. put up this case on 13th of february, 2012 at 2.10 pm in chambers. let the interim order dated 20.05.2011 be continued. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15817 of 2011 ====================================================== Shyamnath Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

13. 01-2012 The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a compliant case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. With the agreement of both sides, the matter was referred to Mediation Centre of the Patna High Court on 26.09.2011. The report of the Mediation Centre, at Flag-A, reflects that no acceptable settlement could be reached between the parties. Both sides agree for mutual parting ways on payment of one time alimony. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to seek instruction with regard to the payment of one time alimony. Put up this case on 13th of February, 2012 at 2.10 PM in Chambers. Let the interim order dated 20.05.2011 be continued. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial