Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sadanand Ram Vs. the State of Bihar

Sadanand Ram vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974846

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sadanand Ram

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.210 of 2012 sadanand ram versus the state of bihar 2. 13.01.2012. heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.10.2011 in a case registered for the offence under sections 406 and 409 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that in s.g.r.g.y., the petitioner was given 878.71 quintals of rice for distribution, out of which 376 quintals of rice were distributed but 502.71 quintals of rice were not distributed nor the petitioner returned rs. 6,88,712.70/- for the remaining rice. it is submitted that for the scheme of 2006, f.i.r. was lodged in 2011 and calculation has been made without verification and proper enquiry. considering the period under custody, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned c.j.m. madhepura, in connection with chausa p.s. case no. 70 of 2011. u. k. ( dinesh kumar singh, j)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.210 of 2012 Sadanand Ram Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.10.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 406 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that in S.G.R.G.Y., the petitioner was given 878.71 quintals of rice for distribution, out of which 376 quintals of rice were distributed but 502.71 quintals of rice were not distributed nor the petitioner returned Rs. 6,88,712.70/- for the remaining rice. It is submitted that for the scheme of 2006, F.I.R. was lodged in 2011 and calculation has been made without verification and proper enquiry. Considering the period under custody, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Madhepura, in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 70 of 2011. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial